MovieChat Forums > Pushing Tin (1999) Discussion > Air traffic control student's perspectiv...

Air traffic control student's perspective


The producers really did their homework here. I found very few ATC innacuaries about this movie (generally speaking). There was one scene where John Cusak said "nine" instead of "niner". Big deal. There was another scene where all the targets on one of the scopes had the same data block. Oops! :) And the only other inaccuracy I found was when Russell was working approach. He had the Jetlink increase speed to 230. If the aircraft were above 10,000 feet (which judging from the position on the scope seemed unlikely), it would have been ok. Altough, chances are that aircraft was below 10,000, in which case maximum speed for a jet aircraft is 210 (170 if within 20 miles of the airport... again a more likely scenerio). But other than those three errors, a lot of the ATC references were accurate, generally speaking. Phraseology used by the controllers was also dead on.

reply

whoa thats wicked...so...assuming that being an ATC guy is what you do...have you ever mest up and almost made them collide or wutever? and are the stress levels that extreme? just curious becuz i obviously have no idea.
thanx for the info.

im totally bad

reply

Besides maybe the fact that the movie was highly innacurate when it comes to speech rate of a controller. As an ex-controller, the thought of a controller talking that fast makes me cringe. If your truly a student, then you should have reached a point inwhich you learn that pilots rely of your voice, therefore you must speak in a smooth and normal rate for them. If the pilot were to hear you speaking that fast, they would quickly lose confidence in you...because what they are hearing is someone who is not in total control.

reply

Another phraseology error I noticed is the first time we see the Thornton character controlling traffic he says something like "reduce speed to two thirty" instead of "two three zero" as it's supposed to be. He does this a couple of times with different speeds and different jets. But it did seem pretty accurate in general.

reply

I'm an ATC and that's usually a common mistake. Proper phraseology is "two three zero", but sometimes we say "two thirty"... just my two cents.

I work, in case you were wondering, in an en-route facility.

reply

Have you ever spent time in LaGuardia's tower cab? They DO speak that fast! Ground control had my head spinning! I guess it depends on the complexity of the facility. If you've got a dozen aircraft on one frequency, you can't afford to take your time.

reply

In my 11 years in ATC, I heard plenty of controllers speak that fast in the higher density TRACONs. The key is clarity -- if what you say is clearly anunciated, pilots don't need you to repeat it. Having to ask for a repeat in the middle of ORD approach airspace is fatal. All in all, I thought it was above average for movies getting an accurate read on something that is rather esoteric and clannish. For the person asking the student if he'd seen anything close to a collision - I can remember being told by a supervisor in a tower cab that if you didn't have at least one go-around per hour during rush hour, you weren't moving traffic fast enough. I've never seen a collision but I've seen a couple of near misses. I've seen minor crashes - collapsed landing gear, running off runways, etc. I had friends working in SUX the afternoon the UAL232 DC-10 crash-landed and I've heard the tapes of the tower chief talking to the Central Region command center and it's pretty traumatic listening to him describe the crash - partly because I had worked with the guy. For me what made the film accurate wasn't the technical crap - it was the competitive personalities and the psychological stress of recovering from a deal. Now THAT stuff was pretty realistic!

reply

[deleted]

after the orignal poster made his post, he should've yelled out loud, THANK YOU GOOGLE SEARCH ENGINE!!!

no im kidding, I think he knows his stuff, and it's sorta interesting.

"Not only is life a bitch but it also has puppies."

reply

Congrats to you on your job. I wouldn't do that for anything!

reply

I hate to be a stickler but your wrong about the speed limits. According to FAR part 91.117 "No person may operate and aircraft below 10,000 feet MSL at an indicated airspeed of more that 250 knots". So giving the aircraft a speed of 230 is a perfectly legal comand. I know this make no diffrence to most people but I hate seeing wrong info spread.


FAR 91.117 can be found here:
http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/14mar20010800/edocket.access.gpo.gov/cfr_2003/14cfr91.117.htm

reply

I was gonna say 250, but i thought it might be different here in NZ :)

carry on...

reply

250 KIAS is what the FAR 91.117 says but as a Marine ATC, ill have to tell you that F18s and other fighters come into the break at 400 to 500 KIAS on a regular basis. As far as the ATC goes in this movie, 7110.65R phraseology is what should be said. But also in that same pub it says "Easy to understand terms" so if you go a little outside the lines its no wrong or illegal. The primary purpose of the ATC system is to organize and expidite the flow of traffic and prevent a collison between a/c opperating in the system. Get your point across, niner....nine whatever is clever. clarity.

Marine Air Traffic Controller
Lcpl DeCesare

reply

My dad is a pilot and he told me that the general atmosphere inside the room where they work isn't really like the movie at all. He says it's really dark and no one is talking back and forth like that. Instead everyone is really quiet and they are all hunched over their screens completely focused on what they are doing. Otherwise he said everything else was pretty accurate.

reply

I visted Fremont Center on a few occasions with a an ATC buddy and it was exactly that: very dark and quiet, with very few people walking around and no one at all talking to each other (except over headsets, maybe.)

And this is a very busy ATC center that controls everything coming into the SFO Bay Area. And he was about 24 with absolutely none of the tics that are manifested in this film. Except for possibly, his muscle convertible.

reply

It depends on the time, I guess. He would definitely be correct during rush hour, but when traffic density is low, you tend to stretch, maybe get up, and walk around the work station a while without, obviously, losing your situational awareness regarding the traffic on your screen.

reply

[deleted]

not true...lol...my wife is a fox ;)...but hey, seriously, this movie really is more about humans and relationships than about air traffic...and thats good for me..

TWR/APP ATC 5 yrs now ;)

reply

[deleted]

my geuss is to check with EUROCONTROL. www.eurocontrol.int/

reply