MovieChat Forums > American History X (1998) Discussion > This film perfectly justifies white raci...

This film perfectly justifies white racism


but then ends it with the message "don't waste your time hatin".

reply

Point out the justifications in this film.

reply

I had the same impression dtafightclub.

The movie made some strong arguments for white supremacy/white racism...but didn't seem to have very strong arguments against.

The moral of the story, both in prison and out, seems to be=
stick with your gang even if you don't agree with everything, because there is safety in numbers.

reply

Not countering the arguments was a bold move, I think. Bringing them up is necessary to show why they're so appealing, but there's really no good way to counter them without it coming off as extremely heavy-handed.

Don't listen to the negative ones; their arguments are irrational.

reply

Tribalism is tribalism. The basketball court thing for example, is not new. If you got to "war", you better win. There are even white vs. white, black vs. black when it comes to that.

Just recently they kicked some black kids off a court in my city, hogging it up until people finally said, get back to your effing neighborhood. They did.

reply

Is your neighborhood some sort of throwback from the 1950's? I thought this was Anerikkka. Most likely the court wasn't being utilized in that neighborhood. Or, there was a group of white girls watching those kids play which caused the whites to react in such a Klans person way.

reply

So can I just ask what would happen if me and some white friends decided to play on a court in a black neighbourhood while being cheered on by black girls? The local gang would come down and shake our hands? Make us feel right at home??

I've had a lot of sobering thoughts in my time Del Boy, it's them that started me drinking!

reply

I live in the city. White ppl play ball here and it's a predominantly black area...nobody give a sh!t

reply

I live in the city. White ppl play ball here and it's a predominantly black area...nobody give a sh!t


Black people don't fear white people the way white people fear black people.

reply

I just watched this film. I only saw the average rating and thought maybe it would be good, obviously. I am DELIGHTED to see the metascore, once I finished watching it to know that critics did not claim this movie was good. It was laughable.

SPOILERS, in case anyone is reading this who, for some reason, doesn't expect them in this.

First off, the acting was ok at best.

Second, the ironic ending where the black guy shot him, unprovoked.

Third, it's so realistic that everyone would change their outlook in one day. lol Taking down the stuff off the wall, the girlfriend so quickly going form loving him to telling someone to shoot her bf, the younger brother just changing his entire outlook due to a 5 minute story told to him. Just so much realism.

If they wanted to give this message that hating for no reason is wrong, they shouldn't have had the black characters doing bad things and they should have made everything believable instead of going so far left, such as implying that most criminals are there due to racism. lol

I liked it well enough to give it a 6, still, and was glad to see critics agreed. I was all ready to come on here and say critics' high score shows how they bias everything on their political views.

It was ok, but I was getting movies sent to me from Netflix, and this wasted one of my discs where I am getting one less great movie, thinking this one would be great.

reply

I love the movie but you do have some great points.

reply

"the acting was ok at best."


I think the acting was more than ok, Norton, Furlong and Torry with really good and believable performance.

the ironic ending where the black guy shot him, unprovoked.


Don't forget we talking about honor culture in these neighborhoods, blowing smoke on another person may be considered as a insult that the other person feel he need avenged.

it's so realistic that everyone would change their outlook in one day. lol Taking down the stuff off the wall, the girlfriend so quickly going form loving him to telling someone to shoot her bf, the younger brother just changing his entire outlook due to a 5 minute story told to him. Just so much realism.


Maybe your best point. Things change too fast, finding out that your whole life's a lie, and the whole ideology you grew up on is a false doctrine is not something that can be overcome in one day, most people tend to object, deny reality, repress, and in most cases: defend and justify their ideology in other ways. It's the same with secular and religious groups alike. I am actually thing that's much more non-believable the change in the girlfriend. In Danny at least you can say that his big brother have great influence at him and his story impact him (especially the rape story) but end his history work with MLK quote - doesn't make a lot of sense. It's feel like Danny didn't believe in these things in the first place and only wanted to feel part of a group or be cool. Not one he confront his brothers about the Nazi ideology itself, didn't even ask one question. In the director defense, we can ask ourselves if we believe in "life-changing event" and if the answer is "yes" the transformation can be believable. After all it's was a intense day, full of emotion, with many shock moments.




reply

This film unapologetically outlined point for point everything that is wrong with our country.

The most ignorant post's on this message board are the ones that claims "See white people are racist..."

What they won't hear is the arguments in the film that drive the point that WE ARE HELPING YOU, AND YOU ARE SPITTING IN OUR PEOPLES FACE.

It's politically incorrect for white people to stand together, and look out for their own... but look at everyone else!

We are being torn apart, and fed to fat single mothers on welfare who raise criminals.... It's time people started looking at the statistics, the facts.... THE TRUTH

reply

I don't think the OP and I saw the same movie.

The movie is clear that whatever white, black, yellow, blue, purple, or whatever other color a human might have, being human comes first, and there's decent people everywhere, and there's also scum everywhere.

reply

The movie is clear that whatever white, black, yellow, blue, purple, or whatever other color a human might have, being human comes first, and there's decent people everywhere, and there's also scum everywhere.


Name two black people in the movie that weren't criminals.

reply

The purpose of the movie was to show the perspective of Derek and Danny. What sparked their descent into the hate movement, what kept them there, and what led them out of it.

For most people who watched the movie, it was something of a mind-bender. Most, I suspect, started watching it expecting to hate the main characters all the way through. But even in their darkest, most twisted moments, there's something about Derek and Danny that resonates. So much so that, by the end, I suspect quite a few viewers were actually ashamed that they'd empathized with Derek and Danny, even in their lowest points.

As a parallel, there have been several attempts to dramatize some portion of Adolf Hitler's life. The two more recent ones have tried to avoid simply painting him as a cartoon, and instead tried to portray him as a person. A horrendously flawed, hate-filled person, but nonetheless a person. One of them (Hitler: The Rise of Evil) tried so hard to avoid treating Hitler sympathetically that it ended up verging on cartoon-dom. The other (Der Untergang) succeeded because it humanized him without making him much of a caricature. It generated a form of sympathy for the subject that seems strange until the viewer realizes what it really was: the same kind of sympathy a person feels for a rabid dog, while also acknowledging that it must be destroyed.

It's basically impossible to effectively deal with hate and evil without first trying to understand it. Yes, the movie ended with "don't waste your time hating", but that theme is expressed elsewhere in the movie too. Most eloquently by Dr. Sweeney when he visits Derek in prison after his rape:

"There was a moment when I used to blame everything and everyone for all the pain and suffering and vile things that happened to me, that I saw happen to my people. Used to blame everybody. Blamed white people, blamed society, blamed God. I didn't get no answers, 'cause I was asking the wrong questions. You have to ask the right question: Has anything you've done made your life better?"

reply

I think most reasonable people would have seen that Derrick's arguments, like Hitler's in Mein Kampf, were just an angry man pissing in the wind. Anger at the death of his father, who we are also shown indoctrinated him with racist ideas, was his issue, and he'd used non whites as a conductor for this anger. Ultimately every white supremacist he listened to was full of crap, and we are clearly shown this. The only person who was straight with him and could actually offer him some peace in his mind was Sweeney, who happened to be a black man. Notice in the jail, he talks to him about his father, about his anger, not about how noble blacks are? Sweeney offers him a potential end to the anger that drove him, not a piece of black brotherhood.

The big argument against each and every one of his rants is reality, which is also the argument from Sweeney's words. Not a single opinion Derrick had held had stopped his pain or improved his life.

reply

Is it your contention that this movie attempts to dispel the stereotype that blacks are more violent?

reply

For the period 2008–12:


Poor urban blacks (51.3 per 1,000) had rates of violence similar to poor urban whites (56.4 per 1,000).


Poor Hispanics (25.3 per 1,000) had lower rates of violence compared to poor whites (46.4 per 1,000) and poor blacks (43.4 per 1,000).

Poor persons living in urban areas (43.9 per 1,000) had violent victimization rates similar to poor persons living in rural areas (38.8 per 1,000).


Persons in poor households at or below the Federal Poverty Level (FPL) (39.8 per 1,000) had more than double the rate of violent victimization as persons in high-income households (16.9 per 1,000).

Persons in poor households had a higher rate of violence involving a firearm (3.5 per 1,000) compared to persons above the FPL (0.8–2.5 per 1,000).

The overall pattern of poor persons having the highest rates of violent victimization was consistent for both whites and blacks. However, the rate of violent victimization for Hispanics did not vary across poverty levels.

reply

Black males make up around 7% of the US and commit around half the murder.

Like most wannabes, he starts fu­­c­k­in' up fast and pickin' up speed.

reply

Wow what kind of an idiot watches the entire movie and thinks it justifies white supremacy. How about you open your ears when you watch a movie you *beep* *beep*

The dinner scene with Derek's mom's Jewish boyfriend actually provides arguments for both sides of the Rodney King debate. Also, Derek's father's argument about affirmative action can easily be counter-argued. The movie is about racial tension as a whole in this country, favoring neither whites nor blacks. The only way anyone could see this as justifying white racism is because it follows a white supremacist. I suppose by that logic, Malcolm X also justifies Islamic extremism?

reply

The dinner scene with Derek's mom's Jewish boyfriend actually provides arguments for both sides of the Rodney King debate


It really doesn't though. Schlomo Shekelberg made the same tired excuses for them while Derek pointed out facts.

The only way anyone could see this as justifying white racism is because it follows a white supremacist


The blacks response to everything, and I mean EVERYTHING in the movie, was violence.

reply

You forgot about Dr. Sweeney. And Lamont, Derek's friend in prison. In other words, the two most important black characters in the movie don't fit your description.

Revenge is a dish best served cold.
-- Klingon proverb

reply

A Jewish friend of mine admitted that Derek made some compelling arguments, as they relate to illegal immigrants. Just sayin'







"My girlfriend sucked 37 d*cks!"
"In a row?"

reply

Technically Lamont was a criminal, just completely nonviolent. He was just a stupid kid who really wasn't thinking, but he broke into a closed store and did not hurt anyone. Lamont saw the same thing in Derek that Sweeney did... an opportunity for real change. Derek's rape was a big contributing factor, but the real turning point came before then with the 'angry sex' talk from Lamont. Derek wasn't stupid; he knew the whole time after his rape Lamont was the one who really protected him. Sweeney was using Derek in a way, but he had to because Derek may have been able to wake up some of his old crew. More than that, he knew that Derek was the only one who could ever have the influence to get Danny out. Sweeney wanted to bring Cameron down as much as anyone, but his primary concern was always for Derek and Danny.

I tend to be a bit sympathetic when it comes to nonviolent petty criminals like Lamont. He didn't hurt anyone and wouldn't. I suppose some might put me in the petty criminal category but I really don't care. If I help a starving, abused animal run away from home the cops don't give a *beep* and neither does the public. If I got caught the owner would have a lot more to answer for than I would. It's a morality vs legality situation.

reply