Speaking of guilty pleasures? This ain't no Showgirls!!

Well if i want to watch a movie called Showgirls or Striptease. I want to see some T-n-A

so Definately Showgirls!

I hate to be nitpicky, but it's T&A. It stands for t*ts and a*s. Sorry to be such a spelling/grammar jerk, but I couldn't help myself.

i agree =) Burt and the vaseline is worth the price of admission =)

unlike a lot of the reviewers here, i liked both Ving's and Burt's performances =) i thought they were the only reason this movie was worth watching

and has anybody here mentioned the fact that Demi Moore never smiles while she's dancing? she has this dour look, i know she's a mother in pain, but geez... usually most dancers put a smile on it as they're parading around in their bare ta-ta's and hoo-ha =\

as for Striptease vs. Showgirls, i'd say it's a wash... the main star in both is not the main attraction... in Showgirls, Gina Gershon is both delightful to watch and beautiful eye candy... i just happen to think Striptease has a nice storyline and Showgirls sucks

I was hoping this movie would be fun, but it's a mess, with painfully unfunny comic scenes. Showgirls really moves and is a nonstop laff riot!

Showgirls much better as an entertaining guilty pleasure, this was just boring.

Brand new store-bought boobs. The movie must have been an excuse to show them off.

Striptease is a half-hearted exploitation flick, they give you a flesh show and try to make up for it by Demi saying the napkins are demeaning to women (And having guys stuff singles in her drawers isn't?). Then there's where she tries telling her daughter there's nothing wrong with her dancing, but the way the men look at her is wrong. It's the PC hypocrisy that sinks it. I'll take the Andy Sidaris or Russ Myers movies any day, no phony pretexts.

Anyone else notice the board games kept changing from the close-ups to the long shots?

Maybe I prefer that though - the unintentional humour is funnier to me.