MovieChat Forums > Castle Freak (1995) Discussion > SPOILER: Plot based on horrendous child...

SPOILER: Plot based on horrendous child abuse


SPOILER:


What makes CASTLE FREAK so terrible is that the plot is based on horrendous child abuse. The duchess had a child out of wedlock by a common American soldier during the ending days of World War II. In that European culture, so many cultural and social taboos were broken. A young woman of aristocratic heritage has illicit sex with an American soldier. Not only was the man a foreigner-American-he was a common enlisted soldier, not even a commissioned officer. And then after the war the soldier returned to the U.S.

The movie is not clear whether the duchess was enraged at the American soldier leaving her or not, but it is clear that whatever the cause, the duchess was unbalanced. The duchess essentially CREATED the monster. She deprived her son of a normal, human upbringing so that his mind was little better than that of an animal. She also disfigured her son. It was never shown or explained but there is a quick frontal scene of the always-nude monster son where it shows his penis was severed a lot time ago, cut by a sharp instrument and not torn off. I don't know for sure if the abused son was missing his tongue but I think the mother may have removed it, too.

The real monster was the evil duchess. The monster, the abused, disfigured son, was as much a victim as he was the killer.

reply

Nice review, but you fail to address your central conceit. Why is the film so terrible BECAUSE it's based on horrendous child abuse? Does that make Spotlight a bad film? Or Sleepers? Or The Exorcist?

Clearly you understood the 'monster' was created by his mother, no problems there.

Or do you mean 'terrible' to be synonymous with 'terrifying'?

Surely no film has ever been good or bad purely because of the subject matter is contains. It's all in the handling.




Never defend crap with 'It's just a movie'
http://www.youtube.com/user/BigGreenProds

reply

Or do you mean 'terrible' to be synonymous with 'terrifying'?

Surely no film has ever been good or bad purely because of the subject matter is contains.


Well said. He no doubt meant that the film is effective as a tragedy, which means it's quite good for what it is, despite the small budget ($500,000).

reply

I'm having a movie marathon and just finished Demonic Toys and noticed that the same painting from that movie in this one when they first enter the castle.The one of the possessed countess from Demonic Toys. Are the stories connected ? Is it a copy of a all known painting ?

reply

Well, Charles Band, the producer, was involved in the making of both movies. Maybe they reused some props on an earlier movie for this one.

reply

I always felt sorry for Giorgio.
He was a victim plain and simple.
As horrifying as his actions were (killing the cat, the hooker, the maid) , he was made that way by his psychotic mother.
If he wasn't chained up in the basement all those years, he wouldn't have become a monster.

reply