When people say a movie was "overlong" and they couldn't "wait until it was over," I always wonder what kind of restraints they were in that they couldn't break and go screaming down the street. I am amused by people who think that calling a movie "boring" makes it boring for EVERYONE. Same goes for movies one person finds funny but the next one might not and so on.
Another poster (I have lost the post, sorry) made the flat statement that movie critics are paid to be objective, not subjective. Actually, it's the other way around. They're paid to be opinionated. Now, Rotten Tomatoes can come in handy. Say there are 114 total reviews for a movie, and 111 are "fresh" and 3 are "rotten." Well, you're going to avoid that movie like the plague, aren't you? I mean, 98% of professional moviegoers who are paid for what they think can easily have failed to "see the same movie" that you did. Works the other way, too. I always have at least $11 burning a hole in my pocket, so when I see a movie with a 6% fresh rating, I know that's the flick to see! Critics schmiticks.
You want only objective info about a movie? Keep your eyes strictly on everything above the first user review on a movie's IMDb page.
As for Shadowlands, it is my cup of tea, but it really is designed to appeal to a niche audience. Not a rarefied group of snobs, but people who enjoy quiet little based on a true story dramas from time to time. Not a big thing.
reply
share