MovieChat Forums > Shadowlands (1994) Discussion > A terrible film that bored me to tears

A terrible film that bored me to tears


Shadowlands has got to be one of the worst films to have ever come out of Hollywood. Anthony Hopkins is totally unconvincing as C.S. Lewis, and the equally unrealistic and tedious but ensuing "love affair" just made me wince with embarrassment. Hopkins is totally out of his depth. I kept thinking he was either gonna eat someone, or turn on his dire Nixon impression!
The film as a whole was overlong, and I just couldn't wait until it was over with. A sentimental piece of Hollywood candyfloss that is enough to make anyone other than its ardent fans wanna vomit. Terrible. Only 0.5 out of 10 scored.

reply

Critic girl, i am normally the first to say each to their own and do not criticise personal taste, but you have no taste at all lol
Seriously this film did have some minor things that made it less than perfect, and in my opinion its no where the film of Remains of the day, which is as near to perfect as you get, but the way you slate this film meakes me wonder if your top ten films are not all action movies and all made in hollywood? I almost bet thats the case...take a step outside Critical lass
gareth

reply

You're a *beep*

The Dude Abides...

reply

When people say a movie was "overlong" and they couldn't "wait until it was over," I always wonder what kind of restraints they were in that they couldn't break and go screaming down the street. I am amused by people who think that calling a movie "boring" makes it boring for EVERYONE. Same goes for movies one person finds funny but the next one might not and so on.

Another poster (I have lost the post, sorry) made the flat statement that movie critics are paid to be objective, not subjective. Actually, it's the other way around. They're paid to be opinionated. Now, Rotten Tomatoes can come in handy. Say there are 114 total reviews for a movie, and 111 are "fresh" and 3 are "rotten." Well, you're going to avoid that movie like the plague, aren't you? I mean, 98% of professional moviegoers who are paid for what they think can easily have failed to "see the same movie" that you did. Works the other way, too. I always have at least $11 burning a hole in my pocket, so when I see a movie with a 6% fresh rating, I know that's the flick to see! Critics schmiticks.

You want only objective info about a movie? Keep your eyes strictly on everything above the first user review on a movie's IMDb page.

As for Shadowlands, it is my cup of tea, but it really is designed to appeal to a niche audience. Not a rarefied group of snobs, but people who enjoy quiet little based on a true story dramas from time to time. Not a big thing.

reply

With all due respect, it is obvious at the time of your review you knew little about cinema. Hopefully in the eleven years since, you have seen enough similarly fine works as Shadowlands, and lived enough in the world, to give a much more accurate review. Perhaps you will also have learned that Hollywood isn't in England, where the film was made. I love the fact that Attenborough makes films about real heroes of the real world, such as Gandhi, Grey Owl and C. S. Lewis, people who decided that doing the right thing could make the world a better place, with small victories, an inch at a time--not losers like Eminem, Tupac, Bonnie and Clyde, that didn't deserve a biopic. Kudos to fine filmmakers like Attenborough who know true heroism when they see it.

reply

This film is terrible, but for a different reason. Unlike the original British TV production with Joss Ackland (who is much closer in resemblance to Lewis) and Claire Bloom, this movie manages to totally eliminate the one thing that brought Jack and Joy together which is *Christianity*. Only in this PC secular day and age with its perpetual contempt for traditional Christianity could we see a movie about the 20th Century's greatest Christian apologist where his faith is treated as an afterthought. This was emphatically *not* the case in the British TV production where the matter of Lewis grieving and then regaining his faith is treated directly but with great and brilliant subtlety (particularly with its effective use of first person narration quotes from his great work "A Grief Observed").

reply