MovieChat Forums > The Firm (1993) Discussion > Gene Hackman and David Strathairn gave t...

Gene Hackman and David Strathairn gave the best performances in the film


In my personal opinion, I think these two great actors were the stand outs in the movie. Both bring so much depth and humanity to roles that could easily have been phoned in. Hunter was fine but I found her a little actory at times.

David Strathairn is amazing as the older brother, you can see how much he cares for Mitch yet is longing to find his way in the world again. He actually makes you care about him, creating a fully rounded human being who has dreams.

Hackman was brilliant because of how much sadness he brings to Avery, you get a sense that The Firm really took everything out of him. Under the flashy and confident lawyer is someone who is yearning for something and is sad, and he finds it in Mitch's wife. It makes you wonder that Hackman's character is what Tom Cruise's character could have ended up as if he stayed till he was Avery's age. You get a sense that Avery was a lot like Mitch, he joined the fim with so many hopes and dreams and it eventually took away everything from him and destroyed him on the inside. In that sense Hackman wants Mitch to get away, so you get a sense that he also cares about Mitch, so he doesnt make the same mistake he did. Just like Avery replies when Abbey asks what will The Firm do to him he replies "Whatever they did, they did it a long time ago".

reply

I definitely agree. Strathairn's performance is phenomenal for such a small part, yet he commands your attention whenever he's on the screen. It's not a dynamic performance but it's a damn near perfect performance and a perfect balance for Holly Hunter's rich and all too personable character.

hackman, of course, delivers the goods. he's every ounce of confident, but there's that sense of desperation - trying to stay afloat as the sharks swim all around him. I don't know anyone who could have delivered the role as well as Hackman did. No one delivers a defensive and desperate laugh the way he does.



Boy, if this wasn't where I put my signature, I'd really let you have it!

reply

Agree. They both gave potentially flat roles some depth.

http://www.amazon.com/The-Mortal-Creeps-ebook/dp/B006LO3TCA

reply

Hackman played the role well but he was 20 years too old. In the book Avery was supposed to be 44, in good shape and capable of picking up 20 something women.

reply

You think Gene Hackman in his age in this film couldn't pick up?

He oozed a certain confidence, if a bit desperate.

reply

Hackman was crushing pussy all day and night. Respect.

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

Gene definitely brought a lot more to the role of Avery than one might think. In short, the guy was perfect.

But nevertheless, I must say that I was far more impressed with Tom's stupendous performance than anyone else's in the film. I honestly think this is one of his greatest performances.

As for David S, his performance is my favorite after Tom's.



They really are rude to Americans! - Al Bundy on the French

reply

Really? Hrmm. I wanted to punch Gene Hackman in the vagina, and David Strathairn just seemed like...well, David Straitharn.

Now, Diabeetus Brimley, on the other hand. Who knew that guy could be that guy.

reply

"and David Strathairn just seemed like...well, David Straitharn."

He was also miscast, like he usually is.

reply

They were as always. But Cruise was excellent.

reply

I agree. I always love him in films. In this, he had a perfect mixture of cocky bravado hiding a certain level of nervousness, even among his own colleagues, who he knows could bounce him with the blink of an eye. His quiet phone call with his wife --"It used to be worth it" -- subtly indicated why he is a philanderer (at least in part).

reply