1991 the year punk died


that would be a much more adequte name for this movie

reply

[deleted]

You are missing the irony and the context of the title. The title was an inside joke on this tour, a sarcastic response to Motley Crue's covering the Pistols' "Anarchy In The UK". The individuals on this tour were less than enthusiastic about such a concept. Thus, an "In-Joke" was born and it stuck as a title. This film was shot prior to Nirvana's massive "Nevermind" a turning point in music history, whether you like it or not. Nirvana were opening for Sonic Youth, who were responsible for their signing with Geffen. While many small minded (not unlike yourself) cried SELL OUT, both bands retained their unique visions and produced amazing works. Nirvana of course imploded too soon while Sonic Youth continues over a quarter of a century later. "Bleach" was recorded for $600., and this film was made for just a few thousand more. I defy you to come up with something, ANYTHING this accomplished (for literally no money). Good luck!

reply

p-u-n-k spells 'punk'!

that's all.

reply

For god's sake Nirvana, Sonic Youth and their contemporaries didn't kill punk, nor is punk 'dead'.
Nirvana were not a punk band, but they were heavily influenced by the first wave of punk bands. They were alternative rock, and helped launch the grunge scene.I'm no fan, but I'm willing to acknowledge their impact on rock music.

Some people seem to think "OMG SELL OUTS!" the moment a band signs to major label. What a load of crap. If you're in a band, you want your music to be heard. And being signed to some *beep* half broke independant label isnt going to make that happen. Theres a big difference between complying to your record companies every whim just so you can earns mountains of cash and trying to get exposure for your music and band.

Punk still remains alive today. Ever since its beginnings its been more about just music. I know it sounds cliched, but punk is also about a way of thinking , acting and expression. People see wanker bands like 'My Chemical Romance' , 'Fall out boy' and 'Blink 182' on MTV or whatever and wail and moan , saying "This is the end of punk, oh woe is me".
But really, these groups , with their thin veneer of a watered down version of what they like to think is punk are always going to get more exposure because record companies are going to be able to market them easily , make music videos and get 9 year old boys who like skateboarding and angsty teenage girls to buy their albums.

If you look a little a little harder, you'll find there are still many bands that remain faithful to the punk spirit. Are they going to get the same exposure? No. Ever since the end of the first wave of punk, which many see as the be all and end all of punk, many new punk bands would never reach the same level of awareness as its originators.

Like I said before, only the watered down wanker groups like 'MCR' and 'Fall out boy' will get that exposure, and will achieve commercial sucess.
Johnny Rotten once said "Only the fakes survive". And he's absolutley right.

Thats what made the 1991 alternative/grunge scene so significant. While these weren't necessarily punk bands, these were grounps in the same vein of first wave punk that managed to break free from the obscurity of underground scenes to reach some sort of awareness.

reply

if punk is dead at all, it killed itself. it's a music form that's too simple to allow for much creativity.

reply

That last comment is so puzzling... Anyone with the slightest bit of knowledge about the genre could easily pick ten bands off the top of their hands that are all considered punk and all sound very different. Heck, punk has so many different subgenres and subdivisions, and incorporates such varied influences (from classic rock n' roll to reggae, from ska to metal, etc.) that it's nearly impossible to keep up. There's PLENTY of room for creativity.

reply

THE YEAR PUNK BROKE. WHAT ELSE BREAKS. WAVES. THE PUNK WAVE BROKE. WAVES COME AND GO. THE YEAR PUNK BROKE. ROLL OVER LONDON, ROCK ON CHICAGO.

reply

A more authentic punk rock inspired sound broke into the mainstream in North America in the early ninties. The title stands true.

reply

For the record, punk didn't die, and Kurt Cobain and grunge sure as hell didn't kill it. That said, Nirvana never were really "punk". I mean, hell, Courtney Love was 100 times more 'punk' than Kurt ever was (case in point: Hole's first album and singles, TOTAL punk/noise rock). Anyhow, like others have said here, punk "broke" into the mainstream circa 1991. That's very true. But, people who think that Kurt killed punk or who think Nirvana was punk— you're both wrong.

reply

Nirvana was a hybrid band--but they did have many songs, especially earlier on, that were straight forward punk.

And yeah Courtney Love was 100 time more punk--i mean she killed a person, can't get much more punk than that!

reply

I agree, What made Nirvana big was Kurt's merging of his favorite genres and doing it with amazing talent. Nirvana was way more than some punk band.

His love of John Lennon and metal bands like slayer mixed with punk and noise rock was a winning formula. He didn't limit himself,so by abiding to songs he wanted to make, the range of Nirvana songs are vast.

Despite how Kurt felt after he got famous, It's exactly what he wanted the whole time before he did.
He is a perfect example of the saying-"be careful what you wish for, you just might get it"

reply

*beep* that, dude.
Punk died with Johnny Thunders. The Dolls were the original punks.

reply

Should've had BOREDOMS footage.

-
pre·ten·tious: characterized by assumption of dignity or importance.

reply

[deleted]

I bought the DVD last week in a huge department store chain, beat Punk to death once and for all, beat it violently, killed it, killed it dead, killed it with fire.



What a bunch of smelly, rancid, putrid, vile and boiling pile of monkeydung. Punk's doing fine, Rock is doing fine, music is doing just nicely, the diy spirit of punk is more alive than ever, big marketing behemoths are crumbling and withering and everybody, no matter how unique and bizarre can have his records released somewhere, somehow, go on tour across the basements of his friends and only 20 people will ever notice it happened, but those 20 people are having a blast.
I don't know what people are constantly bitching about.


And in case you are really deeply disturbed by the lack of good bands nowadays go pick up a guitar from a flea market or a second hand shop and annoy your neighbors, that's "punk" my friend, or are you all just too afraid you couldn't handle the rawness after you've grown old and comfortable? ;)


Signed
A pissed off 23-year young, hoping to be more pissed-off when reaching 24

reply

The exact date punk died was: June 28, 1993.

IMBD Fail #2: "I didn't see this movie but..."

reply

for those of you wondering what the guy above me is talking about, it's the date of GG Allin's death. GG Allin was definitely punk rock--the biggest and most unflinching degenerate in rock history, to be precise.

reply

Ian Watkins kinda beat him to that title now I'm afraid :(

Kudos for the swans avatar btw

reply

Wow, I looked up Ian Watkins...."who?" "Oh, that's right, the lostprophets guy"....

....I'd never read what he actually DID though.

UGH!!!!!!!!! Oh God, that is so sickening! I can't even LAUGH at that crap! What a sickening perv! You're right, that is definitely nastier than anything GG Allin ever did!

reply

26 now and I look like a homeless person with a joyfully clingy fungal infection who mistook a guitar for food and tried to eat it on stage. Art students clap but they won't give me any medicine.

reply