Who saw this in cinemas back in 89?


Who saw this back in the day? What were your memories - the anticipation of seeing it in the weeks/days before, the actually seeing it and how much a big deal was it where you were back then, the crowds, audience etc and after coming out of the cinema what were your thoughts and in the days/weeks that followed….


i was so hyped for it after IV (still a kid) and remember seeing segments of the trailer on tv and the coming soon quad poster outside the cinema way before it opened and wondering what the story could behttp://www.filmonpaper.com/site/media/2011/03/StarTrekV_quad-1-500x375.jpg

UK didn't get it until the October so just as well there was no internet back then otherwise everyone would've already known the plot inside out! very easy to avoid spoilers back then lol (then again I remember seeing a guy in a clothes store showing a comic off to his mate and I saw it was the DC Star Trek V comic and I went on a hunt around town looking for it (why didnt I just ask the guy where he got it? I was probably too scared lol) eventually found it (either that day or a week later) in a newsagent that sold loads of American comics (this was before the town had its own SF comic store) I cant remember if I was able to resist reading the comic or not..

anyway when I saw it opening night i remember thinking something wasnt quite right. the FX werent as good as the previous ones, plus it was too jokey (ok IV was basically a comedy but it was funny...not desperate like the gags in this). and the end felt very rushed. even as a kid when you think every movie you see at cinema is awesome i could tell it didnt click. but i still bought the starlog movie magazine, DC comic and novel(which both had expanded scenes, rock man ending). as well as Shatners account of making the movie book (also remember seeing these big action figures of Kirk,Spock, Bones and sybok but they were out of my price range)

reply

Yep saw it in 1989 & the VFX were so shocking then more than now it literally takes you out of the movie along with the very weak forced humour & non action story points you could guess even in 89 it was the studio cutting corners to save money.

It felt like half an unfinished ST movie with temporary FX.

reply

I saw it. I want my $4.50 back. In fact, I think they owe me another $15 for the two hours of my life that they wasted.

reply

[deleted]

I saw it. I like it sure its not as good as 2 3 4 or 6 7 and 8 but its better then the boring first one.

reply

I was a little disappointed after the magnificence of IV but I still enjoyed it. I cursed it though for leaving "Row row row your boat" stuck in my head for around 2 weeks.

--------------------
Duty Now For The Future

reply

Not only were the fx bad but so was the print copy.
Back in 1989 there was a story that a lot of the movies were being made with cheap film stock. The Bond movie of that year looked bad and so did GHOST BUSTERS 2.

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

I saw it three times in the theater in 1989. The third time was as a double feature with Indiana Jones & The Last Crusade.

reply

Same here - double feature with Indy and STV. I was 11, and it was my first Indy movie, and the first Trek movie i saw in the theater 1st (i had already watched the first 4 on VHS.)

reply