MovieChat Forums > The Witches of Eastwick (1987) Discussion > Cher vs Susan vs Michelle : which one do...

Cher vs Susan vs Michelle : which one do you prefer ?


They're all fantastic and beautiful actresses but I've always had a soft spot(and i'm a girl) for Michelle.Anyway,they're all breathtakingly stunning : the wise brunette,the shy red-haired and the dreamy blonde.







OSCARS 2010 : COLIN FIRTH/MELANIE LAURENT/ CHRISTOPH WALTZ/MO'NIQUE

reply

Susan. still hot! I love Michelle as well but Cher? No, I can't stand her!

reply

I like Cher.She's one of the rarest women in the industry who can sing & act(suck on this,Madonna!!!!).Michelle is one of my favourite actresses and so is Susan.







OSCARS 2010 : COLIN FIRTH/MELANIE LAURENT/ CHRISTOPH WALTZ/MO'NIQUE

reply

I tried to like Cher but she's hugely overrated in my opinion. When it comes to Madonna, I'm mostly into rock music (Bryan Adams, David Bowie, Queen etc. etc.) but she is one of the two my favorite pop artists (along with George Michael). As an actress, I only saw "Shanghai Suprise", "Shadows and Fog", "Body of Evidence", "A League of their Own", "Dick Tracy" and "Evita", and none of those roles (except "Evita") needed that kinda great acting ability and her performances were enoughly good for me.

reply

Madonna is a lousy actress(yes even in EVITA) and she can't sing either.I guess her success is based on her cameleon style.Some of her songs are great,though.








OSCARS 2010 : COLIN FIRTH/MELANIE LAURENT/ CHRISTOPH WALTZ/MO'NIQUE

reply

Madonna's sucess? Great PR.

I don't think Cher can act. Though I quite like her music.

As for the thread topic itself: Michelle is without a doubt more beautiful, but Susan somehow has great sex-appeal. Susan's also undoubtedly the best actress of the three.



Liz Lemon: Chocolate chocolate chocolate! AAACK!

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

Michelle, definately. I mean, Michelle has always been stunning and she still is, especially for her age. In this movie, I actually 'wow'ed at how youthful she is in this movie, and she's an amazing actress. So it was her, followed very closely by Susan (who I kept wanting to shout, "Damn it, Janet!" everytime she came on sceen...followed closely by "slut!!" (I've seen Rocky Horror waaaay too many times). I resisted.

And Cher is...I was mildly suprised actually. She wasn't amazing, but she wasn't exactly...bad either. But out of the three, she wasn't the prettiest. Michelle was.

'What I calls, enterprise. Popping pussies into pies!'

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

Michelle easily. She's actually pretty adorable in this film.

reply

At their prime It'd be a tossup between Susan Sarandon and Michelle. Probably I'd choose Susan. I still remember how sexy she looked wearing underwear in TRHPS!
Today: Michelle, she's the younger of them all and the one that still looks shagable.
I've never found Cher attractive. Granted she "had" a hot body plus an exotic beauty but she ain't my cup of tea.

reply

I was surprised at how beautiful Cher looked in the film and Susan Sarandon also looked splendid.

Michelle Pfieffer is obviously the most classically beautiful of the 3 however I am not into women that are too conventionally pretty... I prefer beauty with an edge and for that reason I would chose Susan.

With that said and I will say this again, I was surprised at how beautiful Cher looked here. She definitely held her own in the looks department next to Sarandon and Pfieffer so she would be my second pick.

Today, it is a different story. I still find Sarandon terribly attractive and Pfieffer has mantained her beauty while Cher, looks like a plastic surgery nightmare.

reply

anyday!

reply

In the movie, strictly going based on sex appeal:

Susan Sarandon. God damn, was she hot! Her attitude, how she carried herself, etc. She was unforgettable in the movie as the horny witch.

I masturbate a lot

reply

[deleted]