MovieChat Forums > Radio Days (1987) Discussion > This movie is actually greater than it a...

This movie is actually greater than it appears on the surface



First off I am a Woody Allen fan, through thick and thin.

I remember the first time I saw Radio Days in 1987. I was amazed by it, and now upon viewing it again 20 years later I think i know why. Woody manipulates the viewer weaving stories of fiction centered on the family that connect to a few realistic moments such as Orson Welles War of the Worlds broadcast and the Pearl Harbor announcement. This movie is a fun ride.

Santo Loquasto's production design is historically appropriate.

The cast is bulletproof, a great ensemble.

When I first saw this movie in 1987 as soon as it ended, I felt like standing up in the movie theater and applaud. I will still applaud it to this day.

Thank You Woody

reply

Well thereĀ“s nothing wrong with the "surface", either. A perfect mix of humor and nostalgia, highly entertaining & actually better than Amarcord. My second favourite Stiffy.



"facts are stupid things" - Ronald Reagan

reply

I'm pleased to see so many people touched by this film. I too find it to be one of Woody Allen's best. It's a warm, loving film and it leaves you with a warm glow, even if, like me you missed the actual radio days. Told so anecdotally, it could have fallen apart under less skilled hands, but he knows just how to pull it all together. It's one of those films without grand pretensions in which everything is sheer perfection.

reply

Well I have to agree, it was great to see the cast, great cast. It was real fun to be reminded of the old radio shows (not old enough to heard the originals, but been a fan since first hearing the Shadow and then CBS Radio Mystery Theater (Tony Roberts stared in many of them). Other than that, sorry but can't help but feel it was dull. I'm sorry I spent the time watching it the first time, won't give it a second chance. I mean it's fine, and anyone saying things like "it's crap" are just stupid, it's just that it didn't grab me.

reply

I also rank this as my favorite Woody Allen film, though it's in an exact tie with "Hannah and Her Sisters" (released the previous year) depending on which one I have more recently seen.

One of life's greatest pleasures for me is watching a new Woody Allen film in a theater, all by myself (preferably at a matinee where the theatre is almost empty). Somehow the first viewing of an Allen picture, especially the more gentle ones such as Hannah... and Radio Days. I still remember seeing this in such a circumstance in 1987, when I was only 23. I have always been the "nostalgic type" and at that time I had not quite found my way into the adult world, so I was looking for an escape to a different world and this turned out to be the perfect thing.

At the time, my parents still lived in the same town I did, and when I next spoke to them, I asked if they had seen it and told them they had to, as they are the EXACT age to most appreciate this movie, the music, and the times it recreates. They did love it, and my dad couldn't fathom how I could have liked it since I wasn't born until 20 years after it takes place, but I found that silly, as it's such a wonderful, perfect example of a "time capsule" that part of the point is that it shows those of us who were NOT there, what those days were like.

I just finished watching it on DVD for the umpteenth time, though it had been awhile, Now I'm not far from the age my parents were then, and try to imagine a movie about MY childhood years (late 60s/70s) coming out now and whether it would be just as strikingly nostalgic, but it is impossible to compare, because there have been so many TV shows and other movies since then about those decades, while there had been very little, and certainly not in such a blatantly nostalgic manner, done about the living on the home front during WWII; just actual War movies. I once again say, Thank you, Woody.

reply

I love Radio Days. It was a personal and heart-felt movie from a director at the top of his game.

There's so many things to enjoy about this one. I like the attention to detail, the family dynamic, the music, 40's era NYC, Woody-as-narrator, all the little stories and characters interwoven throughout. It's all very funny, moving, and watchable (I've seen it many, many times and never get tired of it). It's a meditation on nostalgia that doesn't get overly sweet.

reply

Every word you wrote is exactly how I feel, and I just watched it once again. I agree that Allen was at the top of his game in the mid 1980s.

reply

I walked out of theater then and turned it off today.I do not get it?

reply