Americans...


I was just wondering if it was mainly Americans (or Aussies/Chinese/whatever)who were posting and voting, or whether it was more of a cult thing over there and it is mainly seen by the British.

reply

I'm an American and saw this years ago when it was first broadcast on PBS here in San Francisco. I rented it from Netflix recently and was blown away again by it. I wanted to rewatch some of it before I saw the American version. Somehow I knew I'd be disappointed in the recent film, and I was. Downey's performance doesn't even come close to Michael Gambon's. The story also had to be cut down so much for the recent film most of the good bits are gone.

I've read that Potter himself did the adaptation for the film version shortly before he died in 1994. I don't know if that's true or not. I'm eagerly waiting for the last three episodes of the original from Netflix to help me forget how awful the American version was.

reply

So, not a good idea to rent the film version, then? I didn't think it would be, because I don't think this story can be compressed into 2 hours (even if the great man himself did it, which I think he did, though who knows how much editing there was) but it's good to see some confirmation.

reply

Sadly, yes Potter did adapt his own work. Hate to admit that. But in all fairness, it is the money/the studio and the production heads that really control the development of a script. I am sure he had many notes on changes, etc. It was not a good script, maybe if one didn't know the original at all...?

But the updates that they tried were not good. The music didn't need to be changed and the setting...they just made a mess of it. Personally I don't think that the material can be edited as severly as it needs to be to fit a 2 hr film format and still tell te story effectively.

reply

I saw it first time around when i was 13 on BBC TV. I remember some of the morality discussions around it in the newspapers, and on TV. Despite that it was regarded as an instant classic as i remember.

I am still in awe of it... it is to the moving image what Ulysses is to the printed word,

reply

If I remember correctly, Potter wrote the screenplay for the American remake, in order that it wouldn't get butchered in the same way that 'Pennies from Heaven' was. Sadly, without his presence during its production, it fell very much the sae way.

reply

I am an American who was living in Finland when I saw this series.YLE also showed Blackeyes,Pennies from Heaven and "Gasp" the glorious G.B.H.I had a lousy time in Finland but some parts were o.k.

Selah.

reply

I am an American who was living in Finland when I saw this series.YLE also showed Blackeyes,Pennies from Heaven and "Gasp" the glorious G.B.H.I had a lousy time in Finland but some parts were o.k.

Selah.

reply

I'm an american and I had heard the title of the singing detective when I was a child. It must've been from the TV but I remembered that I liked the sound of it even at such an young age. As a young adult, I had completely forgotten about it until I saw that a film remake of it had been done. So I set myself to watch the film.....and I could not believe it was so horrible. It was one of the worst things I've ever seen. It actually made me feel embarrassed that it was an american reproduction of a series that i'm sure deserved much better.

Afterwards, I dedicated myself to watching the original, once and for all. I ordered the DVD set and I have just finished watching the last episode.....and yes it's a masterpiece beyond anything I expected it to be. Absolutely brilliant. I can't wait to watch it again and again. Great writing, Gambon is amazing, directing is superb, just perfect drama.

A timeless work of art.

reply

i had a conversation on imdb a few years ago with the director of the remake of TSD, a nice guy who had high hopes for the film (he was in pre- production)and said that Potter himself did indeed do the screenplay.I did still have doubts it must be said.Potter was quite ill at the time and i do wonder how much it impaired his judgement.I guess the studio, as always, probably took over and thus there ended any hope of integrity.the result was indeed a disappointment.But frankly it was always on a hiding to nothing; how could a two hour film ever capture the original feel of the mini series?
While we criticise the studio, maybe we should be grateful someone had the audacity even to think of funding such a complex project...just maybe there a re a few dreamers in hollywood who are still in love with good drama and artistic talent..just a shame they make a hash of it most of the time!




i would never join any club that would have me as a member - Groucho Marx

reply

Having finished part 2, and sticking with it ONLY because so many say it is good, I am amazed it was remade, too. The actors involved, especially Gambon, Malahide and Staunton - are the reason I got it - but am finding it plodding and dull. I'm not an American snob, American stuff is awful in its own way but - greatest thing on television? Hardly. Maybe it improves; there are 4 more episodes but if this was shown in parts on PBS as it was on BBC, I'd never have made it past part 1. Will go back to watching North and South (BBC) monthly. I'm trusting those who say it ends well. So far it's on a depression par with Our Friends in the North. (Which I enjoyed but it WAS depressing.)

reply

Wait with the impressions until after you see the whole thing. All of the episodes (and the content of the episodes) are interconnected.

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]