MovieChat Forums > She (1985) Discussion > Deserves a better reputation and a high...

Deserves a better reputation and a higher rating


SHE needs more good words said about it. I love this film. And not in any ironic, so-bad-it's good way, either.

I think this flick has the following, great qualities:

1. The blonde, Amazonian presences of Sandahl Bergman (always a fan of her's) and the sweet-feisty Quin Kessler. Just seeing them for 90 or so minutes is pleasant enough. Also, although the script doesn't go into much detail about it, their characters of man-shunning members of a society of Spartan-style female warriors are very interesting.

2. The film's all-round esoterism. First there are the locations, ranging from subterranean temples and medieval-looking marketplaces, to disused factories and demolition derby-style arenas. Second there are the different social systems, including militarist, feminist, hedonist and fascist. Third are the highly original combinations of familiar ideas; eg., a colony of Ancient-Greek-style hippies, spouting poetry and listening to the lyre by day, who become Venetian-style masqueraders, lovers of rock-and-roll, and - ultimately - Werewolves, by night.

3. The classic story elements such as rescuing a damsel in distress and an Odyssey-like journey through strange and hostile lands.

4. The film's roughness. This is important as a corrective to turn to after seeing too many slick, machine-tooled modern action movies. With the CGI and the general excess of polish, they lack the flawed, humanising charm that is precisely what SHE has to offer. I for one love this movie's unusual editing and dreamlike ignorance of practical matters such as how the characters get from A to B. It reflects the nature of those great, silly, adventure daydreams we had as boys.

The only flaws in the film are the disappointingly un-epic battle at the end, the bad acting of Godan's red-robed woman, the utter flatness of Davis Goss' performance, and the gratuitous whipping scene of the ladies.

Other than that, or in spite of it, I think the film is a genuine gem.

reply

I just caught this gem on Netflix and all i can say is WOW! I'll disagree and say that the whipping scene was spot on one of the best scenes in the film. I haven't seen Sandahl Bergman since Conan the Barbarian back in the 80's but she's one fine looking lady to this day.

I'm a big fan of Werewolves, Nazi's, and Zombie's as antagonists and this movie delivers all these and more in spades. Awesome movie, underrated for a low budget flick for sure.






reply

By all evidence this would seem to have been a quick CONAN ripoff / cash-in italian style, but it seems to have been made even BEFORE Conan, or immediately after and then released into theaters the same year. Is this possible? Does anyone know the real story?

reply

it was released 2 years after the 1st Conan film

reply

Your observations are spot-on. I have always liked this movie but never could quite put my finger on the reasons for it. Your commentary nails it perfectly!

reply

ONLY if it was spoofed by MST3K. THAT version, would THEN deserve a higher rating. 

reply

i don't believe David Brandon was leading a hedonistic band of werewolves,
they were werecats

reply