MovieChat Forums > After Hours (1985) Discussion > But What is After Hours Actually About?

But What is After Hours Actually About?


After Hours is a contemporary, urban "Wizard of Oz,”. This is the story of what happens when you don’t surrender to the art and chaos of Love in downtown NY.

Its about a man, Paul, who dares to venture from the daily routine security of work and into the chaotic world of love that leads to lust, art, confusion, fear and hurt.

Paul meets the beautiful Marcy who invites him to Soho. He starts a journey that is the fast and crazy ride we call falling in love. But there’s an emotional cost to this journey as $20 dollars slips from the taxi.

Kiki is the sexy, artistic, hard edged and cynical girl, this is her social guard. She has obvious emotional baggage displayed in a paper Mache shell, it is her “scream”, it is the shell she hides her pain behind, it is her art.

Paul helps Kiki with her scream, she relaxes and he starts telling her about his own scars, the burns unit when he was a kid, its his trauma. She doesn’t listen and falls asleep.

From KiKi emerges Marcy, he has made his way through her social gaurd, to find a confident, trusting and beautiful women underneath. Marcy invites him into her inner sanctum. Its not where she lives but is where her memories lay. A room where she was raped, a room of her past love, a room of her inner most secrets and fears, her heart.

They emotionally dual, he learns about Marcy’s past rapture and how he screamed out “Surrender Dorothy” when he came. She found this imperfection ugly and it destroyed the relationship.

Paul himself searches Marcy for imperfections, he finds the burn cream. Is Marcy scarred so much that she is ugly, has she got burn scars hidden? He studies and toys at her emotional scream on the way out, the relationship has a cost attached to it, its $20.

Marcy holds a torch for him, a big candle, she is in love, she has let him in and is exposed. He finds a book on burns, he’s convinced she’s hiding deep scarring. This scares him, he can’t surrender to her love, they break up and he runs.

Paul gets to the subway, to leave but cant escape, the emotional cost of the relationship is now higher. The Policeman won’t let him leave. He’s blocked.

He finds himself at the Terminal Bar and searching for answers.
Tom the barman is Paul with out a social guard. He can tap his inner feelings to understand the emotional cost that the relationship has had on him. Tom gives Paul the keys to his inner sanctum. The gays at the bar show how Paul is in touch with inner feminine self. This helps, as there’s an emotionally sane way out. He needs to surrender heart to Marcy.

Paul finds KiKi emotionally tied up. She introduces him to Horst, her masculine strength. Horst tells him he was rude to Marcy. He apologises, he’s let back into her inner sanctum. He explains to Marcy why he was so mean and why he has pain, he opens up but it’s too late, Marcy is emotionally dead.

The relationship is now passed, away.

He takes the last opportunity to see if Marcy was hiding burn scars, but underneath she is perfect, she is beautiful. He’s screwed up. There is too much pain, he breaks out and leaves.

Marcy has put on her emotional guard again, she is Kiki again, back in her paper Mache shell, she is tough, cynical and ready for the NY singles circuit, she has gone clubbing.

Single and on the rebound, he meets the bar lady, she invites him up, shes not smart but is pretty, and offers him the plaster of Paris bagel paper weight. The same thing Kiki offered but he never received. Paul doesn’t want her bagel though. He wants Marcy’s

Back to Marcy’s, he steals from her paper Mache scream, but the cab driver takes off with his money. This journey into love has truly cost him, there is no going back.

Paul’s hurt and falls into the third relationship; still on the rebound he is taken by another woman who just wants to mother him. This emasculates him, she works for Mr Softy, she demeans him with the phone number joke. She finds his emerging shell, his scream has started to appear on his body, the newspaper clipping stuck to his arm, he is forming a mental shell to hide behind.

His demons from his broken relationships are chasing him. There is no escape. “What do you want from what have I done!” He screams into the Soho darkness.

Emasculated, Paul’s desperate, he seeks male companionship to work out his demons. "this is my first time doing this with a man." The man wants companionship, Paul just wants a social prop, he off loads his problems and then runs.

Paul finally meets a fourth woman, June. She isn’t much, and likes the attention; he hides behind her from his emotional turmoil. She see’s his pain and helps to build his emotion shell.

Shell built and safely encased, Pauls has protection from his personal scream, he can now escape the traumas of his relationship, the pain of Marcy. His skin is thick, this is time to heal, as a broken leg would in a cast.

The cast breaks. He’s now out, no longer overwhelmed by the chaos and disorder bought about by the crazy ride that is love. The torments of love are healed and back to his personal refuge in mind.

He is in the sanctuary of order and process that is his office. He is safe within defined boundaries where there are no dreams, no chaos, no self expression, just process.

A symphony of functional order, daily routine, rules, paper files, and staplers and to where the computer says, “Good Morning Paul”

reply

This is actually really good, most people tend to look too far into movies or just pull at straws but I'd say you are pretty spot on with this.

Also who is Lauren?

"The thief is sorry he is to be hanged, not that he is a thief."

reply

Thanks BlindedInChains, Lauren was an error and has been rectified to the more suitable Marcy.

What I have brushed on is painfully thin. I think AH's is an extremely complex movie. It strikes a blazing pace as it squeezes an entire relationship into just one night and is then again squashed into 120 minutes for our celluloid viewing pleasure. Its like we just observed the double compression of a complete romance lifecycle on fast forward. Some sort of fast food chick flick, a filet of relationship, served for your easy consumption.

So what I have brushed on is painfully thin. As you say, its easy to look at an artistic master piece and miss the wood for the leaves, its just a simple love story, the trick is that its all in its delivery.

reply

One thing that kind of bothers me though is, that it actually took them (Scorcese and the producers) a long time to decide on the ending, they went through many many different ideas, if you want to read more about it just check out IMDB's trivia section on it. But the part that bothers me is that that means they never really had the whole movie in mind when making it so it holds a little less value for me. Not sure if I'm being very clear on this.

Also, what other movies have you analyzed, I'd really like to read more by you.

"The thief is sorry he is to be hanged, not that he is a thief."

reply

Yea, it detracts from it for me to, but at least the premise is there. I especially love the ending in the office and the way that the camera pans around with the symphony in the background. Brilliant.

If you like these arty movies then check out my analysis of Jim Jarmusch's, Broken Flowers. This is a lot more cryptic than After Hours, but I think the premise is a bit more brilliant. If you haven’t seen it then make sure you watch it before you read my spoiler observations. I love the process of trying to work it out!

reply

But how does one explain Dunne's disappearance from his desk during that final gliding camera shot. It's obviously intentional, and seeing as your analysis of the film seems on-the-mark in so many ways, I'm curious if there's any way — or many ways? — to read the character's disappearance from (or into) his own boring world. Or have I just read it correctly myself? :)

reply

Coolistmovies, Its a bit like staring at a Warhol or Pollock, Im sure theres lots of ways to read the empty chair....

This story is not about a man and a women, but an allegory to the timeless summation of the many human collisions, all those neurotic fumblings, neatly folding them into one perfect symphony, an onging harmony, by day, by night, that which is New York city.

......and cut!

reply

thank you Coffee_Monster.

I like your insights.
it makes me feel there are many movies that I did not really appreciate because I did not 'get' the deeper meaning.

This was a wild ride... like a roller coaster.

reply

Coffee_monster...that's so weird...it's 5 yrs later. The two movies I picked up from the Library this week was Broken Flowers and After Hours and watched the past two nights. What are the odds. I had seen Broken Flowers last year, but wanted to watch it again.

reply

Did you notice that June had burns on her back. She's the one that Marcy was picking up the burn cream for. It's easier to see this on the big screen, and the burns are clearly visible in Club Berlin just before they go to June's apartment.

reply

Nobody noticed that it is all a dream?
Good morning paul..it's what his computer says in the end.

reply

Just watched it and I disagree with a lot of your reading. I don't think this was about love at all, Paul just wanted to get laid and was a prick when he thought Marcy was burned. He could have redeemed himself by admitting to Tom that he had a part in Marcy's suicide, he didn't, he let Tom live with blaming himself.

He was just an unhappy office worker who tried to say yes to life but couldn't actually hang with it. In the end his boring office life is heavenly.


EDIT: And now I'm realizing your post is 4 years old and I feel like an idiot. Oh well, someone else will come along and read this.

---
You'll never get what you want if you don't know what it is.

reply

I did, and i agree more with your simpler analogy, he had several interactions with people reaching out and to him and he is totally ignorant to them only interested in getting home and going back to 'sleep'

He wants to live and get some excitement but he isnt interested in anyone else, he gets bored of them talking and then in turn bores them back with his own tales,

Also the artwork for the film, the clock with his head being wound up suggest he was just being played an given the run around on purpose, i was certain the film would end with all the characters back in one place and he had taken part in an elaborate piece of concept art
'Do you think the bass is taking away from the vocal?'

reply

From the first time I saw it (Jesus, 35 years ago!!!) I thought of it in terms of The Wizard of Oz.

reply