Who would win in either a fistfight or a gunfight. John Rambo from the Rambo films or James Braddock from the Missing in Action films. It is appropriate that I am comparing them. Both men were special forces guys who went back to Vietnam to find their missing comrades. Both men would most likely know the same thing about Martial Arts, weapons, explosives, and tactics. I think Rambo would win because he is bigger and stronger. What do you think?
shareIf you saw the conditions that Rambo was subjected to in Vietnam you'd agree that they weren't any better than Braddock's. Rambo was hung in that disgusting mudpit for god knows how long and covered in leeches. Also, the torture bed/rack that he was put on in First Blood Part II was pretty bad.
Anyways, I think Rambo is a better warrior/war machine but Braddock is a much better fighter. In terms of knowledge/training in the SF, they are on par with eachother.
Just my .02
Rambo back then, and Rambo now would kick his ass, of course this battle will lead to the Big Bang...
shareYOU TELL ME.BRADDOCK KILLED OFF A RAT WITH JUST HIS MOUTH,AND HIS HANDS TIED TOGETHER,HANGING UPSIDE DOWN FROM A TREE.
shareOzzy Osbourne once bit the head off of a bat. Chuck Norris once bit the head off of Batman.
It would be a battle but Norris... I mean Braddock would win in the end.
In a fist fight, Braddock. But throw in edged weapons and the edge definitely goes to Rambo.
When you steal from Peter and give to Paul, you will always have the support of Paul.
I have to go with rambo,chuck norris is a legend,but braddock is not that much of a legend,and we are talking about braddock vs rambo not chuck vs stallone, rambo is a legend,rambo wins, period.
shareAs a huge Norris fan, I would choose Braddock anyday.
shareThey should team up with John Matrix and work together.
sharebraddock would win in hand to hand combat clearly but rambo would win with guns unless of course you give braddock a flamethrower on a rope bridge
share