i've got to admit, this sequel is just fine, and looking around this board it doesn't seem to get bashed at all, even critics gives it a fair score, and look at this great supporting cast, his (anthony perkins) voice has changed more than his appearance since 1960, and the stuttering had changed, this sure starts off fast with him saying he sees someone in the window and the voice of his mother, the house looks spookier in colour, the weird camera shots adds some turkey vibe though, can you imagine how today's movies would be seen in the future the way they shake the camera and stuff, also there are alot of product placements in this, and language of course not featured in a 1960's flick as well as nudity, uncomfortable violent bits but on the plus side it's really spooky how someone seem to appear in the house while norman isn't there, spoiler follows, once you know the aunt is trying to drive him crazy it kinds of takes the mystery away though and drags on for a while. i was really hooked on these sequels when i was a kid, i might have even preferred them to the original, and i was afraid re visiting them now would ruin them, but this is not a bad movie, it becomes so tangled up and psychological it actually becomes very creepy and scary, i'm not sure the last twist was needed actually. the 1998 remake didn't even work for me as a kid though... all the censoring and subtlety of the classic gone... watching vince (forgot his last name) pleasuring himself in the peeping hole... yeah, that's what the liberation of censorship was made for. i thought the production year here would say 1982, this sure ran longer than i expected this sort of sequel to do.
🚿 👵 🛎 🍞 🚪
with striped outfit,
fake moustache sneaked in,
she removed the moustache n stripes in my cell,
stone walls felt like clouds of boobies all day,
heaven behind the bars,
she charmed blinded the guards,
took the key free as the wind,
on the run were still having a ball.
reply
share