MovieChat Forums > The Executioner's Song (1982) Discussion > Gratuitous Nudity

Gratuitous Nudity

posted 13 years ago by WhiteHeron
13 replies | jump to latest

I felt so bad for poor Rosanna Arquette. She spent so much of the movie naked when there really wasn't any need for her to be. She could have just as easily been covered up in those scenes and it wouldn't have hurt the story a bit. Guess the director just liked seeing her naked.

[–] donaldrack 13 years ago

Whatever, I enjoyed it. That's good enough for me.

[–] stentor7 13 years ago

As do we all, especially those of us with penises. She is sweet, sweet, eye candy! Damn!

[–] osopestoso 12 years ago

I'm grateful for it.

"They sucked his brains out!"

[–] latherzap 11 years ago

Yup. It wasn't really needed, but was certainly a nice bonus. Damn fine nudity.

[–] WhoisThePrisoner1 11 years ago

Rosanna feels bad for people like you.

[–] runemesa 11 years ago

I guess only the regular cut of the movie has nudity from Rosanna. I rented the movie and it was the Director's Cut version, and there was no nudity in it from her. There was a lot of skin shown, but no visible nudity of her breasts, etc.

[–] ebabie 10 years ago

I feel bad my my penis, I beat the tar out of it watching those nude scenes

[–] runemesa 10 years ago

Your penis shouldn't be filled with tar. You'd better see a doctor about that.

Get well soon :)

[–] jellyree 10 years ago

I want the scenes in question back!

Some PLEASE restore this film.