MovieChat Forums > Falcon Crest (1981) Discussion > The first three seasons were great --- a...

The first three seasons were great --- and then they fired the producer


The first three years of FALCON CREST were actually rather good: a gently gothic soap with a sense of humor, a good sense of place -- geographically and psychologically, a good cast, somewhat clever plotting, a terrific theme song by Bill Conti, etc...

The freshman season began as something of a semi-serial, still a bit episodic, and by the end of that introductory year, CREST had really come into its own, becoming an intriguing show which existed within its own alternative-reality kind of zone.

Season 2 and 3 were good "soap" and the show seemed to know pretty much exactly what it was doing. No, it wasn't as character-based and intelligent as KNOTS LANDING, nor as majestically steeped in its own mythology as DALLAS, nor as pretentious and vapid as once-promising DYNASTY had quickly become. But early FALCON CREST had its own, fairly strong identity, and it worked.

And the ratings were good -- a Top 10 show (its American timeslot after DALLAS on Friday nights certainly didn't hurt).

But in 1984, at the close of its third season, something odd happened -- especially for a series doing so well: the show-runner, producer Robert McCullough, was fired (as was his key writing staff, apparently). While it's not unusual for producers and writers to get fired, the circumstances surrounding his firing seemed strange, and seemed even stranger when one listened to the brass's explanation for it... Someone contrived an apparently-untrue gay sex scandal to explain the firings (back when such things were more shocking) and then later amended the explanation to say the rating had dropped and that that had facilitated the firings (except that the ratings were actually at a peak).

McCullough himself would later explain that a Lorimar executive had it out for him, and that the show's executive producer, Earl Hamner, hated to take on studio politics and McCullough's removal was the result. (The top producers, Hmaner and Michael Filerman, liked McCullough's work, but a senior executive at Lorimar didn't or didn't care about that and simply wanted McCullough gone).

Sometimes arrogant executives who have nothing to do but drink their lunches can be amazingly blind about how a hit show happens -- they think as long as you have the brand name title and a key star, the writers and producers don't matter and the show will just make itself.

FALCON CREST proved that just isn't true. The fourth season, with McCullough newly gone, tried to maintain what the show had built up until that point, but it was hit-and-miss at best. Then, two-thirds of the way thru Season 4, a CBS network executive demanded that year's "distasteful" nazi plotline be dropped immediately, leaving the show to paste together a few side stories and ride out the remaining 10 episodes of the season. And you can totally tell this has happened.

To me, FC never recovered from that point forward. (And the move to de-gothicize the series and give it the '80s pastel look of competing, lower-rated shows didn't help).

Season 5 (Hamner's last year) was drab and cluttered, actor Ken Olin removing the show from his resume out of embarrassment.

Season 6 saw Jeff Freilich take over the show, and it briefly looked like it would be a bit of a renaissance for FALCON CREST, but as the season closes, it begins to go too "camp". By Season 7, the show becomes so frenetic and so shlocky and so cheesy and all set to a tacky, synthesized electronic score, it's hard believe this crap was once a good program a few years earlier.

Lorimar-Telepictures' 1986 decision to switch to a new editing-on-video process which made their shows look as if they'd been shot on cellophane only complicated the spiral.

Ratings dropping badly, CBS calls Mr. Filerman and says "fix it!", so they bring in new producers for Season 8, but the series has been so off track for so long, they don't seem to know how to get back into the groove. So it's just boring -- no longer a joke (or too-jokey) but dull. Named "most ruined show" by a popular soap periodical, new producers yet again were brought in for Season 9, and while the writing gets a tad better, it just no longer feels like FALCON CREST anymore.

Did this have to happen? Does this have to happen??

Camille Marchetta, a writer-producer for early DALLAS, mid-DYNASTY, and later FALCON CREST, once observed that, "a hit show can spin around and around a central point, a producer, a star, whatever, only for so long, held together in that force field. But despite hard work and good luck, its elements will always eventually spin apart."

Undoubtedly, that's true -- series television, especially American television, is infamous for eating up talent and spewing it out at an alarming rate, with hit shows allowed to run several years longer than they should despite an abject crash in quality. But the kind of frivolous self-sabotage that FALCON CREST underwent seemed particularly egregious and unwarranted. (And if they hadn't had their cushy post-DALLAS timeslot, they would have been cancelled well-before 1990).

But then, the wealth-based nighttime soap genre of the '80s, then the hottest shows on TV, died an unusually and inexplicably grisly death across the board. In the first half of the '80s, these series were essentially semi-legit character dramas (with some splashes of glamour and outrageousness tossed in for fun) and they totally worked. All eyes were on them. But by the last half of the '80s, they slipped into a too-campy, trying-to-top-themselves incompetence where bad kitsch became the rule and they became as disposable as snobbish critics had once-unfairly dismissed them as being.

The shift was a bit of a shock to the viewers who then began tuning out in droves. (Except for KNOTS LANDING which maintained quality until the end of the decade). And the genre was replaced in the '90s by the youth-based nighttime soaps like 90210 and MELROSE PLACE.

But if one reviews S1 thru S3 of FALCON CREST, or S3 & S6 & S7 of DALLAS, or S1 & S2 (or S9) of DYNASTY, it's hard to believe these programs wound up where they did: just awful. And awful with a sense of conviction.

It's almost painful.

One can only wonder what might have happened with FALCON CREST had McCullough not been removed from the show over workplace politics by an aloof and high-handed member of the brass.

But there are many ways to kill a show.


--
LBJ's mistress on JFK:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WcXeutDmuRA


reply

Then, two-thirds of the way thru Season 4, a CBS network executive demanded that year's "distasteful" nazi plotline be dropped immediately, leaving the show to paste together a few side stories and ride out the remaining 10 episodes of the season. And you can totally tell this has happened.


The Nazi story wasn't the only story dropped mid-season. Parker Stevenson was let go as well. Actor Paul Freeman (Riebmann) stated that it was like a mini blood bath, some actors were called into the producers' office and let go (Freeman, Abby Dalton, Stevenson, Ken Letner), while others stayed. FYI: of the new storylines in the second half of season 4 was the story of Cassandra Wilder (Anne Archer), who took over Falcon Crest in the cliffhanger. Per TV Guide, the original storyline was to spin-off Cassandra into her own series about an advertising agency set in San Francisco.

FYI: Creator Earl Hamner (who also created The Waltons) stated that he never wanted Falcon Crest to turn into a Dallas clone with wine instead of oil. But that's pretty much what happened.

reply

But it never really was that similar to DALLAS. Early-FALCON CREST seemed to embody a lot more of early-DYNASTY, if anything.

It's such a shame what was done to FALCON CREST, because during its first three or four seasons, it quickly came to absolutely epitomize the cloak-and-dagger, buried-treasure, lust-and-larceny stereotype of a gothic soap melodrama --- and in the best possible way.

It had all the right elements. It was everything it should have been.

DALLAS was more serious and impressed with its own mythology (at least during the first two-thirds of its run) while DYNASTY started out with perhaps the most potential of the bunch yet was left in the hands of incompetent show-runners by its third season who meticulously ruined it over its run. And KNOTS LANDING, a quality production, was more naturalistic and essentially reality-based and therefore constrained by certain narrative rules of minimal excess.

But FALCON CREST could go further and cross over that line, become darker, and still get away with it. It was the "fun" '80s wealth-based nighttime soap -- at least initally. The soap opera for people who thought they didn't like soap operas but whom enjoyed the outrageous, macabre derring do of the denizens of the Tuscany Valley in their mysterious, shrouded little corner of the world.

Who knows where the show could have eventually gone.

But after McCullough's firing, the show soon morphed into a drab -- and then pastel and campily silly -- mess which didn't really work any more.

What an unfortunate loss. You don't get these things that tap into that cliché in precisely the right way very often. And FALCON CREST was, at first, one of those things.

--
LBJ's mistress on JFK:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WcXeutDmuRA


reply

Seasons 3 and 4 were my favourites. I didn't see any immediate drop in quality after McCullough left. IMO, the show only started to drop mid-way through Season 5 (roughly coinciding with the switch to video, which didn't help). By Season 6, it had lost its identity and become a generic 80s soap, overpopulated with dull and irrelevant characters and situations. But Season 4 had one solid plot after another. True, each season got more "soapier" than the last, but there was never a dull episode in Season 4. Great new characters, great new storylines, great cliffhanger. It was a big, full season that had no padding. I felt that the Nazi treasure storyline was perhaps a little contrived (would Jacqueline really have left it all there all these years?) but it was fun and played itself out before becoming tiresome. They could have done more with Paul Freeman, but the addition of Anne Archer as the next schemer wanting to take over Falcon Crest was a masterstroke. My only real gripe about Season 4 (other than the slightly inferior version of the theme tune) was that they never utilised Pamela Lynch as well as they could. You have this fabulous, imposing British actress with so much presence she could hold her own in scenes with Jane Wyman. She should have become Pamela Channing, marrying Richard and then divorcing him and becoming vengeful when he started whoring around with Francesca Gioberti and (later) Cassandra Wilder. Letting Sarah Douglas go was a mistake because she never got the chance to be a truly wicked "rich bitch" which I thought she could have done brilliantly if given the chance.

reply

The drop was gradual during Season 4. But Season 5 was cluttered and crappy.

The video editing hurt all the Lorimar shows beginning with 1986, yes, but S6 was no worse (in fact, slightly not-as-bad) as Season 5 which is where the mess really began.

But you could feel the enforced sudden dropping of the nazi plot shortly before S4 ended, and it felt contrived as if the show suddenly lacked a rudder.

--
LBJ's mistress on JFK:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WcXeutDmuRA


reply

well they started video editing Knots Landing at the start of 85-86 (then FC midway through the 85-86 season, then Dallas from the start of 86-87). Truth be told though, all these shows were starting to die from 85-86 onwards regardless of switching to video editing (even Dynasty which is a non-Lorimar show) though Knots did have a bit of a recovery later in the 80s.

S5 was great for the first six episodes (as it played out the Anna Rossini storyline), but then it became patchy. The good things were the Peter Stavros storyline (at least until they started bringing in his dreary children), and the Jordan Roberts stuff (though they overplayed the multiple personality stuff a little). I liked Emma's romance with Dwayne, and this was probably my favourite Emma season. One of the truly great things about S5 though is that for the first half of the season (where it was still edited on film), the show had never looked better. They were still doing a lot of great location shooting then, but even the sets and costumes looked more vibrant and terrific.

On the downside, the Melissa and Father Chris storyline might have been better if it wasn't such a desperate attempt to restage The Thorn Birds, and the Apollonia storyline was a bit desperate too (trying to make FC hip and failing). Terry seemed like she was merely comic relief throughout S5, so it's probably just as well they killed her off. The Jeff Wainwright stuff quickly became tiresome too (an over-the-top retread of the Darryl Clayton storyline from S2). I do so wish they would have done more with Cassandra Wilder after she became pregant with Richard's child though. The character was truly dynamic (she successfully outmanoeuvred both Richard and Angela in S4) but then seemed to get reduced to breeding stock just so the producers could give Richard a baby (without her in the picture). I suppose they only had Anne Archer on a year's contract though and that was that.

reply

Season 5 featured a major cast revolt regarding Apollonia. She was a recurring guest star who ended up getting the majority of the screen time. The producers of Falcon Crest hired Apollonia (fresh off her co-starring role in Prince's Purple Rain movie) to counter the ratings decline due to FC's main competitor, Miami Vice. Miami Vice was new and hip and openly courted the young MTV crowd. FC producers banked on Apollonia on taking away some of that crowd (she didn't). TV Guide wrote an article about it at the time. I believe Jane Wyman was the most vocal, but new castmember Morgan Fairchild also complained about her initial minimal screentime. She stated she was hired to do a major role but originally was given one to two scenes per episode. Later in the season, after Apollonia left, Morgan's character started to develop.

I do so wish they would have done more with Cassandra Wilder after she became pregant with Richard's child though. The character was truly dynamic (she successfully outmanoeuvred both Richard and Angela in S4) but then seemed to get reduced to breeding stock just so the producers could give Richard a baby (without her in the picture). I suppose they only had Anne Archer on a year's contract though and that was that.


No, quite the contrary. Anne Archer quit the show abruptly, asking out of her contract. She didn't like the direction in which her character headed. Originally, TV Guide reported that her character was developed for a potential spin-off revolving around Cassandra and her ad agency. When the spin-off didn't happen, Archer didn't like Cassandra's turn around very quickly at the beginning of season 5. Cassandra was originally scheming and out for revenge but then became a soft character. She wanted to leave. Producers stated that they would leave the door open for her, but eventually killed her character off (off-screen). I liked Archer and wanted to see more of her, but the cast was already bloated at the time. But don't feel too sorry for Archer, a few years after leaving Falcon Crest, she got an Academy Award nomination for Fatal Attraction. So maybe she made the right decision in bailing.

reply

Yeah, I found Anne Archer as Cassandra Wilder to be a fascinating addition to the show... she came across as very genuine,torn in her love for Richard and quest for revenge on her mother's behalf. One of my very favorite scenes ever on FC was when Cassandra told Richard she was pregnant, and he assumed she was lying (because he had had a vasectomy, not knowing it never 'took') and then told her he had never loved her and to get out of his life. She told him he would never see their child and threw his keys at him and left. It doesn't sound all that exciting or dramatic, but it was intense.

Poor Appolonia... she was so out of her league on FC, even Lorenzo Lamas acted circles around her without even trying to. Who can forget her first scene with Jane Wyman, when Appolonia was in the pool and Lance introduced her to Angela and Angela said "Lance..." Too funny!

I agree, the show really stumbled with the Melissa/Chris story, Appolonia, and even Lorraine. Sarah Douglas as Pamela Lynch was excellent, but shamefully wasn't utilized as much as she could have been. I loved her interactions with Angela and Maggie, but they were few and far between.

reply

I very much remember Jane Wyman's (alleged) dislike of Apollonia and her giving the producers an ultimatum ("It's her or me!"). But then Wyman had allegedly said that about Lana Turner and half a dozen other guest stars, so how much of it is true is anybody's guess.

I also remember reading about the rumour of the Cassandra Wilder spin-off, and often wondered what kind of tone it would have taken. Rather than self-contained dramas like Hotel or Glitter, my guess is that it might have been along the lines of Paper Dolls, with Cassandra running her ad agency like Racine/Morgan Fairchild ran her modelling agency, and doing business with rich and powerful families. It might have been interesting, though if it was successful we never would have had the same Commander Riker in Star Trek: The Next Generation (presuming Jonathan Frakes stayed on as Damon Rossini). However, Dynasty's Bill Campbell was a runner up for the Riker role in Star Trek, which might also have been interesting.

reply

I just started watching FC on DVD - just got through the first few episodes of Season 1. For some reason back then, I never got into it (I was 18 when it started) - I was watching DYNASTY and KNOTS LANDING, but never got into FC (or DALLAS). From what I recall, none of my friends or family members watched these 2 either - we were all fans of DYNASTY and KL.

The first few episodes are enjoyable, though a bit slow for my liking. I shall continue with it, and see how it plays out.

I prefer fantasy over reality TV - like Fox News. - B.Streisand







reply

The first half of Season 1 isn't fully serialized and therefore indeed feels kind of slow. But by the last half of the first season, the show gets into its zone.

--



reply

All of that is irrelevant. Because Apollonia is hot. Even now she is quite tasty looking. :P

In all seriousness though, Jane Wyman hated any female that came in and got more than her share of attention.

reply

I very much remember Jane Wyman's (alleged) dislike of Apollonia and her giving the producers an ultimatum ("It's her or me!").


What always cracked up me up was when Angela always referred to Apollonia as a Babylonia. I don't know if that was scripted or Wyman was just venting her frustrations. LOL

reply

"That Babylonia person" as I recall. I howled at that. And what she called her friends when Lance had them over for a pool party. "I want these aliens out of here!" 

Gotta love the Ange.

reply

Every scene between Angela and Apollonia was gold because you knew damn well that Jane Wyman didn't have to reach down all that deep to come up with her disdainful attitude.

Season 6 was the end for me. All the awful new synthesized background music and weird guest stars and little continuity with the previous season (new producer Jeff Frielilch bragged about not having watched earlier seasons).

reply

I totally agree that the synthesized music that began in Season 6 was a mistake -- especially to use it wall-to-wall in every episode. But otherwise I felt Season 6 was much easier to watch than Season 5 which seemed incredibly muddled and cluttered.

And the scenes between Angela and Apollonia "were gold"?? Really?

--
LBJ's mistress on JFK:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WcXeutDmuRA


reply

I am watching Season 5 now.

The Father Chris storyline is not very good but it’s not awful.

The Maggie amnesia storyline is bad.

But Cole-Melissa-Robin is one of the worst in tv history. Crap, Robin walks in literally every single time they get intimate. Cole won’t let Melissa launch Robin from her own flipping house. Then the little tramp falls down the stairs. All cringeworthy.

reply

I am currently finishing rewatching season three and working my way towards season four.

Why did the network demand the Reibmann storyline get canned? This had a lot of intrigue.

reply