I finally saw this film from Texas Curly coming out of the tavern on to the end. And I don't understand the disgust or objections.
The film did not celebrate pedophilia. It subtlely placed obstacles in front of those who overtly fancied the precocious young teen character.
Beaudray did not have and was not suffering from pedophilia. He hated her company. But, after Bitterstix, he knew he was the young ward's best guardian.
Many seem to forget the story is about the orphan, and not the gambler. She was the one who was commoditized by others. With Beau, she found someone sympathetic. So she worked her charms, and never the sexual kind.
Although the ending is somewhat vague, Beau has already demonstrated to her and to the viewers that he grew to love her, with agape rather than lust.
Brooke Shields' precociousness leapt off the screen. Her manager mom struck while Brooke was a hot commodity. While Brooke's character, Wanda, had the hots for Beau, we have to understand she was talking the talk and not walking the walk. At some point, Beaudray saw through her talk for what it was, a defense mechanism. Like any child, she wanted to be taken care of and to be loved. The ending showed that!
__________
Est modus in rebus sunt certi denique fines quos ultra citraque nequit consistere rectum Goldilocks
reply
share