Could've been better


Now I'm not trying to start a big argument considering this is just my opinion but I think this movie was rather lame. The first movie was great. The second well it got really stupid and had a moral of "stay in school" the whole way through. Don't get me wrong, staying in school is great but didn't belong in this film.

The plot made me really disappointed. They could've made it better. I understand their powers would've grown but I didn't like how they were used. It's hard to explain but as an ending note I was really disappointed by this.

Granted, most sequels aren't usually as good as the first ones but this one had potential to be good but just wasn't. It's almost as bad as the remake of the movie in 1995.

reply

i wasn't aware of any remake in 1995, but personally I liked the Return From Witch Mountain better than the Escape To Witch Mountain.

I think having a morale of staying in school is actually pretty good though, especially since a lot of kids at that age like to skip school. That could very well have been the moral of the story.

I was curious as to how they did the special effects for the repair of the minivan though. That was pretty good. I am guessing they had a smashed up one and then they had a brand new one and found a way to combine them to make it look like it was repairing itself.

I saw a documentary once where they showed how they did all of that stuff, and I must say, it was pretty interesting

reply

They destroyed the minivan and then ran the film in reverse.

reply

IMO, the showdown with Tia and Tony at the end of the film alone was well worth the time.

reply

theres so many better directions this sequel could have taken. i personally would have loved to see tony and tia try and locate more of the children like them. a plot like that of 1982's beyond witch mountain would have been a much better plot for the sequel. who agrees?

reply

My idea for a plot would have the Witch Mountain people being hunted by aliens. It would turn out they were NOT leaving a doomed world, but forced to flee. Their powers would have been the result of genetic manipulation, and when whoever was in charge of their world found out about it they decided to kill the Witch Mountain people. Their spaceship would have been damaged by some sort of space battle forcing them to take refuge on the nearest habitable world (ours).

reply

Agreed, it's a disappointing sequel. I loved seeing the kids as older and more in control of their powers (especially loved in the novelization how Alexander Key mentions that Tia talks to the boys in the voice she'd worked so hard to achieve--it's a nod to continuity with his original novel where she cannot speak out loud, only Tony can). And frankly, it's great seeing Tia large and in charge throughout the movie; she has to rescue Tony, instead of the other way around as it's usually done. (And of course as always, Kim and Ike are great.) But I thought the whole "mad scientist" thing was lame--I mean, a mind control device to use him to "take over the world"? Gee, that's never been done before :) As though Tony couldn't fight back somehow! Hasn't it been established how much stronger Tony and Tia's minds are, in every way? What might've been more interesting is if somehow Victor and Letha used Tony as leverage and forced Tia to do what they wanted, by threatening him (they could've kept him sedated or something). In other words, if they pressured T&T through psychology and the strength of their relationship, instead of a external "mind control" device. Conflict based on relationships instead of external stuff is always better writing.

I also disliked the painfully unfunny "comic relief" (the Earthquake gang). I absolutely shuddered when Tia is having her vision of the bank, she says "I see gold!" and all the kids drop to the ground and start scrabbling around. It's not the kids' fault, it's the writing--this was '70s Disney at its cheesy worst, and instead of moderately believable Los Angeles gang wannabes, we have these hokey, cutesy moppets whom the story uses to hit us with the moral of "stay in school." No, there's nothing wrong with that message, but it doesn't belong in a thriller! One starring the venerable Bette David and Christopher (Count Dooku!) much less--how did they ever agree to be in this? Drug debts must have been involved :)

Ultimately though, as disappointing as it is, it's still better than nothing. It would be great to see them do another one!

reply

[deleted]

Don't forget, the movie was made during the post-Walt Disney pre-Michael Eisner time period in Disney history. ALL Disney movies made during that period, for lack of a better term, STUNK!!!

reply

The original was made in 1974, during the post-Disney, pre-Eisner period, and it didn't stink. Neither did "Freaky Friday".

I agree with the previous poster about the lame "gang", the mad scientist plot, and the heavy-handed "Stay in school!" message. Would have been much better for Tony and Tina to help track down a new pair of Witch Mountain kids, or something like that.

reply

The fact that the professor kept drugging Tony seemed very un-Disney to me.

reply

True, but I suppose it's better than threatening him with horrific consequences, which would be the only alternative the professor would have until the device was implanted. So it may have been simply a non-violent plot expediency.

reply

As a native of L.A., it was depressing to see so much of this shot in the ugliest, industrial areas of downtown. The first film had some lovely locations, but this one stuck pretty much to downtown when it was at its most rundown. And that Starsky and Hutch music! I liked Alfred the goat the best.

reply

Agreed this was not an awful film and had many good points but disappointing compared to the original.

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

I agree, also I think that they could have done more with Jack Soo. He was brilliant and he is just wasted here, not sure why.

reply

It was a poor follow up.

reply