The Thing has no plot? It's a sci-fi monster film, about alien beings that want to destroy/replicate/replace all human life on earth?
On the surface they're not that different, although Invasion has a few more interesting twists and turns right up until the ending. You even learn a bit about the psychology of the alien spores, and it has a definite 70s paranoia vibe going on. By comparison, The Thing does attempt to have a bit of a whodunnit plot progression going on, but with so many of the characters running around behaving stupidly, and a non-ending, then I wonder why I should even remain invested in what happens.
The characters in The Thing were pretty much entirely defined by their actions,
My problem was that all the characters were simplistic, such as the pothead, the military guy, the fat guy, the black guys, the sled dog guy, the nerdy guys. None of the characters extended beyond any surface level descriptions, and were largely interchangeable. The only ones that held my interest were Macready and Blair, and that's because their characters were explored a little bit more.
Whereas Invasion has more unique characters, even if they are somewhat stereotypical liberal San Fran bohemians who enjoy Asian stir fry and mud baths. But they seem like real people, and not just faceless fodder for the monster.
To be honest, I don't think either of these films are that great. They're not bad movies, but I wouldn't call them classics of their genres. I find Invasion to be a tiny bit better because of the above points, but overall I'd only give it a B, whereas The Thing would get a B-.
~ I'm a 21st century man and I don't wanna be here.
reply
share