MovieChat Forums > The Savage Is Loose (1974) Discussion > Controversial, uncomfortable, but not ex...

Controversial, uncomfortable, but not exploitive


The Savage Is Loose in my opinion, even though very uncomfortable and squeamish with the subject matter, was not exploitive. It felt like a sexual psychologist was behind the making of the movie.

The premise is that we humans need sexual companionship from the opposite sex as a matter of biology. Deprived of sexual fulfillment with the oppositie sex can lead to emotional and psychological instability and neuroses, at least that's the idea I perceived.

The husband and wife had each other. But the son, reaching maturity and beginning to feel the powerful physical urges of sexual longing, had no one of the opposite gender. There was only his mother, who per chance in the movie still looks rather attractive for her age. Everyone knows just how powerful sexual urges are in young men to the point of craving. In the normal world, the son would quickly hook up with some pretty girl in his high school. But here he was thrust into an artificial situation.

I think the movie ended on a good, if not happy note. Tragedy is narrowly averted, but there is no solution specified for the son. Really, the only true solution would be for all three to be rescued as quickly as possible.

Other posters have been instrospective about the subject matter as well. The mother was faced with an agonizing dilemna or imbroglio, for which there was no happy choice of outcome. A mother normally would do anything, sacrifice anything, to ensure the health, the well-being, the very life of her child. What about this situation? She understands the sexual torment torturing her son. Does she do the unthinkable to quench his need? Will that even help him at all or harm him permanently. The movie could have dealt further with subject.

If I had to do a remake, one possible different path - you might call it a cop-out or equally squeamish - would be to make the mother NOT the son's biological mother. In other words the story could have been that the biological mother died while the son was in infancy. The father quickly remarried and the new wife adoringly raised the baby boy as if he were hers. So the story line would still be on the squeamish side, but at least avoiding the really truly cringing, appalling issue of biological incest. In other words, my change of storyline would have more possibilities left open to pursue. The second wife could also be significantly younger than the first wife, maybe five to eight years or so which allows the explanation why she is still so attractive. Now, as the director of a remake I could really lead the audience into the edge of gross-out-ness at the scene where the mother and son confront each other physically. Just as the audience is starting to squirm, the mother tells the son, 'I've loved you all your life as much as if I had given birth to you myself'. Then the audience would gasp and realize she is not his biological mother. The son already knew that, but we, the audience didn't know that until that moment.

reply

Being a huge fan of George C. Scott I made sure to catch this film since it's the only one he ever directed. I was very impressed with the claustrophic, island atmopshere that he evoked through his camera work and nervous editing as well his own typically excellent performance. It really is a fascinating, curious work, and I agree with the OP that there's nothing exploitative about it at all. However, I don't think there's any need to analyze, justify or change it's subject matter. It's simply a very original, simple, powerful and dark 'what if' scenario along the lines of Greek Tragedy.

reply

The thing about having the mother not being the biological mother for the son in a remake is that it takes away one of the very important themes in the movie. But I don't think they'll be a remake anyway. The movie is too taboo and people are too damn sensitive. On the off chance that a remake does occur, I can only see it ending one of two ways; either the father lives and kills the son at the very end when they're all on the cliff together, or the son does kill the father and the mother then kills herself, leaving the all alone on the island.

reply

The point is that she IS the biological mother. That is the whole reason this works. Making her his stepmom just eases people's minds. It would make the whole story generic, non-important.

Don't lighten the grip on the audience by revealing that she is not his real mother. Ponder on the fact she did give birth to him and has to make a decision that either gets her husband killed or allows her own flesh and blood to have sex with her or leads into her own death.



I am a signature. Call me George.

reply

It seemed more like a psychological study in a 'what if' situation. It was unsettling, but even as a young man I just thought it was interesting. For some it might be a fantasy. The mother being so attractive sort of twisted my thinking like, "Hell yeah I'd bang her."

reply

Well, you write another story about a boy having his stepmother as his only sexual outlet. This movie probed much deeper than that. It wouldn't be nearly as controversial to bang your stepmother vs your biological mother.

reply

I really have to disagree that this film highlights that a lack of sexual fulfillment leads to psychological and emotional neurosis or instability. That's a modern western pov where sex in primary and above all. The west has become so sexually obsessed that kissing a child in the cheek or sleeping in the same bed is akin to lust and sex. There is no room for other forms of love and affection, lust pervades all aspect of the western modern mindset.

But if you look at other cultures, even to your past, you will see that man is capable to having a strong will, strong enough to overcome these urges.

I think what the film highlights is the importance of nurture and the environment. Sure the parents try to continue to impart their old world (world outside of their island) sensibilities to their son but he sees a different reality in nature, in animals. He sees no affirmation of his parent's teachings or qualms. He does not see the difference between man and animal until the end when he sees his mother reject him for the knife.

reply