Isn't this movie a litlle racist ??

Not at all.

I don't think it is. Other than the bizarre title, it is a legit horror movie and doesn't make fun of any race in any way.

Come, fly the teeth of the wind. Share my wings.

The name "Blacula" may be racist, sure. But then again it depends on how you define "racism". Too many people by default assume "racism" to be racial hatred. And IMO this movie simply does not proceed in any such intention.

The actor plays his part with great dignity and at all times I felt during watching the flick that he was greatly respected by the cast and crew, and enjoyed playing the role.

Likewise, the characters are not the stereotypical types seen in so-called black-sploitation movies of this period. And I guarantee, if they had been, I would have stopped watching straight away.

Why is it racist?

Watch the movie, it makes more sense than you would expect. Hundreds of years ago, Prince Mamuwalde traveled to Transylvania to enlist the help of a certain count in stopping the abduction of Africans by slave traders. Things did not go well, and after giving Mamuwalde the curse of vampirism, this certain count dubbed him "Blacula" as an insult.

People werent as sensitive about language issues back then.

Words dont kill people-bullets do.

The only thing that may be remotely racist is the timing of the movie. Totally capitalization of the blaxploitation trend. Otherwise, the styles, the language, fashions, music, etc were totally in step with the times for the audience it was aimed at.
I'm African American (as is the film's director) & I think it's a really original spin on the same old Dracula/ vampire genre. Especially for back then. Maybe it would've been better if it had come out earlier or later than the early 70s. I also agree with what some here have said- that the racism in the title alone fits. What a *great* idea to make Dracula out to be a racist! Why *wouldn't* he be? He's from the 'old world" & very likely would have racist views, thus dubbing Mamuwalde with a racist name- "Blacula".

I'm repeating something I just wrote in another thread, so forgive me for being redundant. "Blacula" and its sequel, "Scream, Blacula Scream" were important films even if their subject matter (vampires) was lightweight and exploitative. Both films presented minority characters in a wide range of social situations and backgrounds. Most of its black characters were presented as cultured, articulate, intelligent, beautiful, and often wealthy. Even the main villain, Mamuwalde, is more like a tragic hero. He's not a bad guy at all, he is a dignified person who was cursed to hurt people against his will. The two gay characters in "Blacula" are successful businessmen, they're an interracial couple, and they're shown having genuine affection for one another in a non-sexualized way; most importantly, the fact that they're gay is treated very matter-of-fact. All of this was extremely groundbreaking for a film of this era. The stereotypical aspects of "Blacula" are all very surface, and none of it seems mean-spirited or intentionally controversial. 1972 was a long time ago, so naturally it looks dated to us in 2013. But I don't think this is a bigoted film at all, I think it's very positive and important.

groovydoom.blogspot.com