Worst movie ever!


This movie is up there with Beward Children at Play, Daddy Day Camp, The Hottie and the Nottie, Who's Your Caddy?

If anyone tells you this movie is good, they have a bad opinion and they are wrong. The movie has no story and horrible acting.

It is one of the only movies, I have ever been awake staring the movie. and I fell asleep to it.

All they do is go around eating shoes and there is a naked little boy.
It is the biggest peice of garbage I have ever seen.

I could not sit through this crap. But my friend Daron was able to sit through the whole thing and he said it was the worst movie he has ever seen in his life without question and from what I saw I would have to agree.

Please I beg of you, no one see this movie.

reply

All they do is go around eating shoes and there is a naked little boy.
GODS! You are so ignorant! That outlaw wasn't "eating shoes." He was a shoe fetishist. And the "naked little boy" was Jodorowsky's actual son. You may have considered the "acting bad" because there wasn't actually much acting. Jodorowsky picked interesting real people to be in his movie. As for the "movie (having) no story," it most certainly did have a story. It was about a spiritual quest. The "mole" seeking the light goes from gross physicality and naked power to macho contests that, nevertheless, had spiritual meanings, to selfless sacrifice and ego loss. In the end, El Topo has moved to the spirit world. He could no longer abide the cruel world but I think he was shown as having evolved to a higher level. And his son and wife ride off their the baby as life goes on.

Not the "worst movie ever" but the greatest one. It is my favorite. There was a strong Taoist message here. Remember the four Masters? Each one had less than the one before. The one who "beats" El Topo was the one has nothing. The ultimate theme was letting go.

Terry
Your soul and your body are your own, and yours to do with as you wish.

reply

definitely not the worst movie ever, but el topo is overrated, don't get me wrong, i "get it," or as much of "it" that's getable anyway, and i did find value in the picture, there was some instances of great imagery, the jesus-esque character with his bullet-holes is burned in my mind for example, and there was great symbolism as well, such as the two characters who worked in tandem where the one was missing his arms and the other was missing his legs, who actually spent more time fighting each other then anything else, which i believe represents how our biggest struggle's in life are with ourselves; dealing with our own feelings and emotions and our inability to balance them in a healthy way, but there simply werent enough quality moments to fill the 2 hour plus runtime, time and time again i had to fight myself from falling asleep, you can only show weird stuff for so long before weird images become normal and then boring, and that's exactly what happened, i was bored stiff watching this, and boring is the last thing a surrealist movie should be, i believe the only way this movie would have truly worked would have been as a short film, similar to Bunuel's Un Chien Andalou, show a bunch of weird stuff and stop just before the viewer's brain has time to adjust, leaving them stupified, which isnt to say that you cant make a full-length surrealist feature, David Lynch's Eraserhead and Takashi Miike's Gozu are both great examples of full-length surrealist pictures done right, so what worked for those movies that didnt wotk for el topo? the difference was those two movies flowed together much more effectively, but unlike what most detractor's of el topo believe; that el topo doesnt flow well because it had a disjointed story-line, i would disagree, because i felt el topo had a fairly decent story-line, the gunslinger's quest through the desert to find spiritual enlightenment leading to his ultimate demise was a fine story-line, true to life as well, look at what just happened to UFC star Evan Tanner, but it was the disjointed TONE of el topo that was the true problem, the movie kept trying to employ this monty python-esque humor in tandem with these terribly horrific images, it didnt work, the audience doesnt even have a chance to laugh at the supposed funny parts because before the joke is even over somthing horrible is happening, and on the flip side, the audience can never truly be disturbed because before a moment of horror is able to be soaked in, something ridiculously stupid is happening that ruins the effect, so what happened was, in an effort to be both so funny and so disturbing it did neither and accomplished nothing at all, and lastly, as far as the symbolism goes, like i said some of it was good, but so much more of it made no sense whatsoever, and at that point, if nobody understands what you're symbolising, then i believe you're not symbolising correctly, the audience has to understand what you're saying or you're not saying anything at all, it's the same as someone going into a room of people who only speak english and giving a speech completely in japanese, they could have peformed the greatest, most enlightening speech ever, but since nobody in the room understood it, it was a waste of time, and in the end, so was el topo

reply

Jesus jello fighting Christ. My kingdom for a period. Another kingdom for paragraphs. I might even throw in the supposed horse.

reply

my lack of punctuation was symbolic

reply

hahaha - Perfect. I think we have a winner!
Your medium should never get in the way of your message.

El Topo:
Awesome idea, awful execution. Jump cuts require contextual offsetting and symbolic scenes without consistent continuity reveal half-arsed application not visionary film-making; no matter how much gnomic dialogue you employ.

I like puzzles but not one's with badly cut pieces and bits missing.

But hey, it definitely had it's moments.
I'm gonna watch Holy Mountain tomorrow.

P.S. I also love that Daffy Duck cartoon.

reply

HAHA! hell yeah man, i knew i couldnt be the only one that remembered that video, a disney classic, and it wasnt even racist!!

reply

I sigh at people who think a movie is supposed to be done a certain way. Let me say this. Is there meaning to a flower? A Beethoven symphony? A snow-topped mountain? Does one have to find meaning in these things to enjoy them? Mainstream films have really brainwashed almost everyone. It really is sad.

I can shut my eyes and listen to Mozart and have no clue what he was trying to "say" with the music, but it evokes thoughts, feelings, and emotions they don't have names for. That's the power of art, and I think it's ridiculous people try to take this away from film.

There is so much in life that we still don't know. There are things we don't have names for. Nobody can explain dreams: These illogical things that spring from our deepest subconscious and transports us to worlds that feel as completely foreign as they do completely familiar. Dreams that are able to capture you in moods and emotions you've never felt before... But most people don't care about "explaining" dreams, so why must we with film?

"Utiny!"

reply

personally, i don't view dreams and movies as the same type of entertainment, in fact i don't view dreams as entertainment at all, they might be, more coincidentally then anything, entertaining, but they are not true pieces of entertainment such as a book, or movie, or anything purposely made with the intent for public exhibition, and that right there is where any comparison of dreams and movies ceases to make sense, we cant say the maker of a dream didn't make it properly because it didn't make sense, because the maker of the dream didn't even consciously create it, the dream was just a random assortment of images and ideas the person's brain put together while it was in a state of rest, a movie is work of art specifically made by an artist in order to convey a certain mood or express a certain message in order to entertain or educate his/her intended audience, and that is why a movie can most assuredly not make sense

and furthermore, music can make or not make sense as well, the obvious way would be lyrical sense; a singer's lyrics can properly express his ideas and emotions or they can confuse and frustrate his audience, now in the case of classical muscians such as mozart that you brought up, no lyrics are used so no true message can be sent, however the song can still instrumentally make sense, certain instuments can work well together or they can sound terrible when played simultaneously, so i would argue that even without lyrics a song can not make sense

and lastly works of nature, such as a flower, make sense, haven't you ever seen that daffy duck cartoon (what i base most of my math knowledge on :)) about how all works of nature follow rigid mathematcal laws, flowers for example all form perfect mathematcal shapes, now the daffy duck movie didnt touch on moutain tops (however if you want to learn about billiards, i remember quite a bit about that in the movie) but i would imagine they would also follow some mathematical law, so yes all these things make sense in there own way, but unfortunetly el topo does not

reply

RashaTheGreat, instead of dancing around and distancing yourself with “the audience…” comments, why don’t you take ownership of those comments, quit generalising and simply tell us that you did not like the film? The film is what it is and it has achieved an almost sacred level because of that. It is a man’s journey. That man is not El Topo. It is Alejandro Jodorowsky. There are a myriad of philosophies, religions, beliefs etc. that come together here. Free association and symbolism also play a pivotal role. The more you see the film, the more fluent it will be. I can relate to what you are saying about entertainment but this is not entertainment. It is art. Art should be cathartic for the creator. The subconscious is the artist’s studio.

reply

Not the worst movie ever - just a little too over-hyped by armchair art-school 'film buffs' (remember they don't watch movies, only 'films').

The symbolism is not beyond the reaches of most average minds. If you've ever read a book, then you'll have no difficulty reading the 'far-out' metaphors the film presents.

I found it to be very mundane, primarily because the symbolism was blatant to the point of boring. My best guess is that the hip factor only goes as far as your aesthetic sensibilities - i.e. - if Jodorowsky is the farthest 'out-there' you've been then this film is that much better but, say you're familiar with Maya Deren or Matthew Barney or Adolfas Mekas, etc. etc. then this film will be just another better then average film.

Is it worth all of this praise and fighting? Not in my opinion but, that's what opinions are for.

Art is subjective, just go out and get some for yourself.

reply

hey, there's no dancing coming from this guy, in fact my very first comment on my very first post was that i thought this movie was overrated, el topo's journey can be an analogy for jodorowsky's journey, that's fine and very common, many writers haved used characters they made as vessels to tell their own story, to repeat myself, i have no problem with the general storyline of the "journey," the problem is jodorowsky does not express his ideas effectively, i previously used the example of someone giving a speech in japanese to an audience who only speaks english, the ideas expressed could have been brillant, but since the audience did not understand them, then it's just a waste of time, now further viewings of the movie may help, but do i really want to waste my time? no, and it shouldn't be necessary to watch a movie multiple times to enjoy it once

now this other idea of art and entertainment being different, i would fundamentally agree with it, if you want to make movies in your basement and enjoy them in the comfort of your own home, i say go for it, you can make them however you want with whatever you want, have them make as little sense as you choose, however as soon as jodorowsky put his film on the big screen and let those dolla-dolla bills roll in from the profits, he allowed his piece of art to become a product for public consumption, and therefore vulnerable to public scrutiny, if this movie wasn't intended for the public, don't show it to the public, it's as simple as that, or face the consequences, the subconscious may be the artist's studio, but if you're making art for profit, the consumer is your judge

reply

I agree with most of what you said but I do not believe that Jodorowsky is bothered by the external criticism of his films. He has even said that he probably would not make them as they were made then. That was a capsule, a microcosm of the life, the thinking of Jodorowsky at the time. It is natural to seek patterns, connections, fluidity in life (and art). Having said that, this film is far from being arcane. It can easily be understood by any person that has a general understanding of Jungian theory (and Freud to a lesser extent), and any person that has a general interest in all things spiritual. Even if you come into the film without any understanding of these, you will learn something new. Art (and entertainment) should bring out feelings but it is a bonus when you learn something too.

reply

no, i would agree with that, i don't think Jodorowsky is bothered either, i'm not sure anything could bother that guy, the point that i was trying to make was that a director cannot tell his audience whether his movie is good or not, it's the audience who tells the director

reply

I had only learned of this recently while discussing film noir with my old English Teacher, but apparently reputable directors, film theorists, and psychologists have for a long time drawn comparisons between film and dreams. These theorists point out the passive spectatorship involved in both film-watching and dream-experience. Some have even argued that film can be psychoanalyzed for semiotic symbolism in the same way that Freud interpreted dreams. Sometimes the connection between film and dreams is more deliberate, as in the film noir and surrealist genres:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oneiric_%28film_theory%29

While I was watching this film, I found myself baffled and behorror'd as each new scene unfolded. And when I think back over the crude symbolism, lush costumes, surreal music, quick cuts, sparse dialogue, strangely artificial/echoing soundscapes (e.g. woman's voice dubbed with man's voice, or with owl calls), and disjointed scenes of bizarre imagery, I'm reminded unequivocally of a dream.

I think, if we think of El Topo as the telling of a dream, then Jodorowsky is spot-on in his depiction.

And what a helluva ride it was! For me (and I suspect many others who made it through) this was not an easy watch. With a loose plot line with logical jumps and discontinuity (and an editing style to match), poor character development, haphazard emotional arc, minimal dialogue, cheap special effects, tacky symbolism, inexplicable soundscape (am I the only one who noticed this?), and overall gauge-bursting WTF?!-ness, this film without a doubt has very little to offer most people. It reminded me vaguely of Uncle Boonmee. However, I've always prided myself in my ability to stomach just about anything film-related. I love weird films; I even love bad films. Maybe that makes me a masochist... I dunno. But I will remember El Topo fondly for its sheer strangeness, mind-blowing hilarity, dead bunnies, and nothing else.

reply

I'm gonna pull out the big one lol:

You didn't get it! :D

Did you ever notice that people who believe in creationism look really un-evolved? - Bill Hicks

reply

I got it :D

reply

the movie is metaphorical and not for narrow minded people like you.

..dont try to get tough with a keyboard

reply

Alex Trebek: "This is someone who would tell you not to do something, while they are doing that very same thing."

Contestant #1: "What is a hypocrite?"

Alex Trebek: "Yeppers"

reply

are you actually calling me a hypocrite, i havent said this is the worst movie ever.?????

..dont try to get tough with a keyboard

reply

it's in reference to your signature

reply

yeh, i dint think about it . lol

..dont try to get tough with a keyboard

reply

Have you ever watched Comanche Blanco?

reply

Honestly, folks, please just read my tag line:

If we all liked the same movie, there'd only be one movie!

reply

I love it how there's always some witless rube on these boards who starts a thread with the title "Worst Movie Ever!"

There are different kinds of movies. Some films are just mindless entertainment where you can just switch your brain off and absorb storyline and visuals that are undemanding, unambiguous, have only one interpretation and are basically chewed up and spit up for breakfast.

Other movies are experiences in the fullest sense of the word, and cannot really be called entertainment, since they are more demanding. Some movies require an active imagination to appreciate. EL TOPO is one of those movies.

No wonder that some people only seem to "get" this film after watching it under the influence of cannabis or psychotropic substances. Once you alter your consciousness, either through the discipline of meditation or the shortcut of psychadelic drugs, the movie makes a lot more "sense."

Jodorowsky himself summed it up best:

"I ask of film what most North Americans ask of psychedelic drugs."

"If you're great, El Topo is a great picture; if you're limited, El Topo is limited."

reply

"some movies cannot really be called entertainment," lol, i'll say that again, but all you need to do is get smashed out of your gourd with some drugs and you will love this movie, actually that doesnt sound so bad, i might have to try that

but seriously people need to stop using the "If you're great, El Topo is a great picture; if you're limited, El Topo is limited." You might as well just say "I know you are, but what am I?"

reply

Look, Jodorowsky is great, you are not. End of story.

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

THANK YOU itpdude, a rational mind at last, that's all i was asking for

Look, monty, if you insist to put your butt-plug in your butt and your mouth, please, your mouth FIRST, better luck next time champ


reply

I think threads like this are getting so *beep* pointless. The focus of these threads is to provoke and spread debate about a certain film. All I see when I read these is a couple people's opinions and then it slowly transcends to people telling each other to do obscene things to themselves. This is not what these boards are about. No one on this site has seen or met each other before and yet there is all this *beep* about how everyone is a "ballstamper" or should shove buttplugs in their mouths. Honestly, what the *beep*. Talk about the film itself and what you think of it, or go say stupid *beep* to someone else that you have a problem with, in person.

I was going to write something about El Topo because it is so controversial, which makes it interesting, along with The Holy Mountain and Fando y Lis, but all I see is this nonsense.

reply

do you hear that people? he's NOT going to write something about El Topo, how will we recover? all is lost

reply