Gothic drama/romance marked by villages, castles, maidens and vampirism

The story in “Lust for a Vampire” takes place in 1830, forty years after the events of the previous film, “The Vampire Lovers" (1970). These movies were loosely based on Irish novelist Sheridan Le Fanu's "Carmilla," which was published in 1872, predating Bram Stoker's "Dracula" by 25 years. Hammer’s ‘Karnstein trilogy’ is completed by the prequel “Twins of Evil” (1971).

Blonde Dane Yutte Stensgaard is noticeably younger than Ingrid Pitt, who played Mircalla in the previous movie (and was offered the role here). Yette was 24 during shooting while Ingrid was 32. There are, unsurprisingly, several fetching females due to the milieu of the female school, not to mention some tame nudity.

While Ralph Bates called it "one of the worst films ever made," all three in the trilogy are of about the same quality, although “The Vampire Lovers” is the most popular for obvious reasons (Ingrid, Madeline Smith and the overt sapphism, which is toned down here and in “Twins”). I think Bates didn’t like it because of his sniveling character, Giles Barton, who plays second fiddle to the dashing protagonist (Michael Johnson).

Producers insisted on including the pop song “Strange Love,” performed by Tracy, after the success of “Rain Drops Keep Fallin’ on My Head” in “Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid” (1969). As far as I’m concerned, it fits the scene of the movie and isn’t jolting like “Rain Drops” in “Butch Cassidy.”

In some ways, “Lust for a Vampire” is reminiscent of later movies “The Wicker Man” (1973) and “Picnic at Hanging Rock” (1975) due to the progressive girl’s school, just with the addition of Gothic vampirism.

The film was shot at Elstree Studios outside London to the north. The finishing school is located a little further northwest at Hunton Park.