Why the title?


[Spoilery, I guess, for those odd folks who think you should be able to read the message boards for a film without encountering discussions of the plot.]


I anticipated (at first) that the characters were conspiring to frighten the fragile and just-out-of-the-mental-hospital Jessica, perhaps for financial gain... maybe hoping she would kill herself, as per her internal monologue. But nothing like that turned out to be the case.

The title isn't 'Jessica in Fear' or the like. Instead, the phrase is 'Let's Scare Jessica to Death' - something a person would say to other people; the expression of an idea or a suggestion.

So who is the 'speaker' of the title, and to whom are they 'speaking' - and how did it relate to the film, especially the fact that Jessica didn't die, of fright or of anything else?

Is the title meant to reflect the malevolence of her inner voices and perhaps indicate that all the events are imagined?


________________________________________

I don't come from hell. I came from the forest.

reply

relating to her paranoia?

also, those voices other than jessica thinking to herself were from the other chickie.

Swing away, Merrill....Merrill, swing away...

reply

It's a great title, unforgettable.

reply

The title led me to think that this movie was about some teens/kids that try to frighten Jessica as a hoax since she had already been in the mental hospital, but after watching the film maybe it was Emily/Abigail that could have said that to the rest of her male crew.

reply

[deleted]

I've always found the title somewhat curious because no one is scaring Jessica to death, and no one is even plotting to do so. (Or are they?) It's really just Jessica's paranoia, as others have said.

Regardless, I think it's an excellent title, if a bit misleading. I can't think of a better title for this film, and I wouldn't bother trying.

reply

It IS quite a misleading title, but it is also very memorable, which is probably why they picked it. Let's not forget this was the 70s, and exploitation marketing tactics were all the rage.

____________________________
http://thrill-me.blogspot.com

reply

I think it is quite an imaginative and apt title. Its the demons(the conflicting elements) in Jessica's head saying "let's mess her up".

reply

i love this title has the 70s written all over it

Woodrow...You came here with teeth...Do you wanna leave here with teeth!-Aunt Esther

reply

[deleted]

It is a gem. I was very young the first time I saw it, but I knew it was a great atmospheric classic and would still be unsettling to me as an adult, which it is. I think the vampire, and perhaps the town vampires, had a great time scaring her to death, like a cat with a mouse, they (or her mental illness) toy with her.
also it is a 70's time capsule of a movie.

reply

As for the title I also just liked it even when I was a kid as saw this movie on TV back when it was still somewhat new. Even now years later thinking about it I just feel the title works so well for this cool, creepy little horror film. Such a great film and always in the top of my horror lists.

reply

Very poor choice of title - sounds like some trashy exploitation flick which this film really isnĀ“t.



"facts are stupid things" - Ronald Reagan

reply

The movie is aptly named. It's an excellent title for this movie. Solving the mystery of "who" is scaring Jessica means you understood the movie. She's mentally ill & still unstable. For example, schizophrenics perceive their own thoughts (and often when they are conflicting thoughts) in their heads as "other voices" they are hearing. Normal people can discern their inner thoughts and voices as their own and not other beings telling them stuff. Treatments (that actually helped the real organic illness) for mental illness in 1971 were dismal, if not altogether non-existent. Verbal psychotherapy and sedation was the norm. Doctors didn't even know that some mental illness was actually caused by real, organic imbalances in the brain. It's not like today, and certainly no one, the patient nor the supporting family, was commonly, routinely, nor matter-of-fact told that those voices were really their own disassociated thoughts. Mental illness and talk about it was shunned. The family and friends portrayed in this movie appear to be quite supportive for the most part. This movie is not a horror movie. It's a psychological thriller. And people today need to stop taking everything they see in the arts so literally. The character of Jessica is mentally ill and the story is presented through her point of view. Hence her voice over. She's telling you what she's thinking, seeing, feeling. And she's crazy! Her husband tries to shut down anyone who might upset her. He's also human and worn down. He's given up everything for the health of his wife. Jessica lets us know early on that she's not going to share some of her perceptions because it'll clue him in that she hallucinating again. He calms her when he, too, sees someone upstairs and doesn't want it to set her off when it's real. Jessica is scaring herself into a frenzy, to a possible death all alone on the lake. There's only so much the people around her (the ones who even legitimately care about her) can do to dance around her insanity and keep her comfortable. They thought the country would be quieter and less trouble for her, but she can't run away or hide from her own head. The last shot and voice over serve to explain her desperation, loneliness and isolation from the world and everyone, her broken spirit because of the anguish caused by her mental status.
Very little you see in the movie can be taken literally.

reply

Great explanation, iluvnyc. I shared your explanation with a friend who recently watched the movie (on loan and at the behest of me and my wife) and came away with a big "WTF did I just watch?"

reply

This is an absolutely great explanation.

reply