MovieChat Forums > Il buono, il brutto, il cattivo (1967) Discussion > Was there a deep symbolic reason for Blo...

Was there a deep symbolic reason for Blondie not having his trademark attire and scruffy beard?

posted 2 years ago by PopMusicFan1927 (114)
2 replies | jump to latest

As we all know, Blondie does not acquire his iconic poncho until the end of the film - this along with the fact that when we first encounter Blondie, he is pretty much clean shaven and he wears a hat and jacket that has a very fresh look to it and we even see him crack a full smile here - things that we rarely see him associated with in the other Dollars films.

Was there a deeper significance to this? Was there more to his character that was written yet did not make it into the finished film?

[–] wearsalan (5554) 2 years ago

The reason is the actual timeline of the movies is: The Good, The Bad and the Ugly. Followed by For a Few Dollars More and finally A Fistful of Dollars. So the two sequels to A Fistful of Dollars are in fact prequels. So TGTBATG shows Eastwoods eventual evolution to being a lone wolf so to speak.

[–] PopMusicFan1927 (114) 2 years ago

Gotcha. If there was ever a story that would turn a person into a complete lone wolf, it is this one.