definition of classism:
"prejudice or discrimination based on class"
By constantly ridiculing the rich and portraying all rich people as absurd and ridiculous, isn't Bunuel guilty of harboring the same "prejudice or discrimination based on class" that he so violently ridicules?
Exterminating Angel is brutal in its attacks against the rich, yet it offers no reason for its criticism. Are we just supposed to hate all people who wear tuxedos? Despise people who play classical music and enjoy fine art?
I think Bunuel is just the 20th century equivalent of a "hater".
Though I find it hard to believe anyone would look in a work of surrealist art for a justification for the hatred of the bourgeoisie, I am going to take your ludicrous post seriously merely for the sake of urinating on it.
1.) It does offer a reason for its criticism of the rich: it depicts the bourgeois party guests as cruel, shallow and reactionary. They are thus to be belittled and placed in an absurdist situation in which their more violent, crude and animalistic natures come out even more.
2.) Thus, Bunuel's distaste and mockery of these cruel bourgeois idiots is not merely a "prejudice"-- Mind you, Bunuel had been in similar circles before, and knew well enough how absurd human behavior can get.
3.) He never simply makes fun of people for wearing tuxedos, enjoying classical music, liking art, etc. Bunuel himself enjoyed such things (though I'm not entirely sure about the tuxedo part, but I don't doubt it). His is a mockery of class, rather than of culture. You're acting like The Exterminating Angel is merely some piece of vulgar Socialist Realism. If that's what you're looking for, I can't help you-- Though you might get some enjoyment from some of Brecht's plays or Pasolini's Salo. Or you could just go down to a tennis or golf club and lurk in the parking lot until you find someone driving a BMW or what have you and mow them down with an M2 Browning machine gun.
4.) *beep* you.
reply
share