MovieChat Forums > One, Two, Three (1961) Discussion > Capitalism: The Lost Realm of Fun and Pl...

Capitalism: The Lost Realm of Fun and Pleasure


The world has certainly become more political these days, more so than seemingly ever before. During the peak of the Cold War, while the West furtively feared the East and its ideology, there were never any explicit moments of political coercion. Your neighbors weren't partisans who would bang at your door and force you to proclaim your allegiance to the party of capitalism. While the Marxist-Leninist ideology was assumed to be the life-blood of Eastern culture, one could be left to their own apolitical devices in the West—capitalism was "fun and cool." Although the West had its own form of political propaganda, there was no obligation to the message.

"Unlike communist propaganda aimed at shaping one's worldview," capitalist advertising only had one thing in mind: sell items. It was about products and services. Levi's weren't manufactured and sold for ideology. One didn't drink Coca-Cola because it represented Western values. Comic books weren't read for moral guidance. Political involvement was volitional, not mandatory. These products were about money for the corporation, and happiness for the consumer.

The capitalist did not care about your ideology, he only cared about your money. Goods and amenities were sold for pleasure and convenience, not meaning and commitment. Under capitalism, one was seen as relaxed and individualist; under communism, dogmatic and radical. Today, ideology has replaced contentment. Advertising is now used to promote radical dogma; goods and services no longer align with leisure and enjoyment, but are tools to shape political thought.

reply

"During the peak of the Cold War, while the West furtively feared the East and its ideology, there were never any explicit moments of political coercion. Your neighbors weren't partisans who would bang at your door and force you to proclaim your allegiance to the party of capitalism."

Oh dear. You need to look up the history of the 1950s, specifically the "Red Scare", loyalty oaths, and McCarthyism. It involved people going to jail or losing their livelihoods for belonging to the communist party or having belonged to the communist party in the past, or for making left-learning statements or belonging to left-leaning causes. Now much of what pops up on google will be about Hollywood officials or government employees, but ordinary people lost regular jobs for refusing to sign loyalty oaths or for expressing leftist beliefs.

I will allow you a little wiggle room in that the whole mess wasn't done for financial gain and was not strictly a capitalist movement, it was political. But it happened in a capitalist country, and capitalism didn't stop it.

reply

Thank you for your insights. I concede that my opening paragraph could have been worded better to align more with the body of the text.

Oh dear. You need to look up the history of the 1950s, specifically the "Red Scare", loyalty oaths, and McCarthyism. It involved people going to jail or losing their livelihoods for belonging to the communist party or having belonged to the communist party in the past, or for making left-learning statements or belonging to left-leaning causes. Now much of what pops up on google will be about Hollywood officials or government employees, but ordinary people lost regular jobs for refusing to sign loyalty oaths or for expressing leftist beliefs.

Although the West certainly had its own form of propaganda and marketing, Red Scares, McCarthyism, and Truman's loyalty oaths were responses to alleged Soviet subversion and subterfuge. They were temporary events, similar to anti-Catholic propaganda during the Protestant reformation or anti-religious Voltairism during the Enlightenment.

During the Great Depression, some disenfranchised and affected individuals immigrated or attempted to immigrate to the Soviet Union in hopes of a brighter alternative to their impoverished circumstances. The Red Scares, just like McCarthyism, were political movements (admittedly affecting a portion of regular individuals) aimed at addressing communist espionage and increasing influence.

I will allow you a little wiggle room in that the whole mess wasn't done for financial gain and was not strictly a capitalist movement, it was political. But it happened in a capitalist country, and capitalism didn't stop it.

Under Capitalism, selling Coca-Cola globally was done primarily for profit, not influence. The Soviet Union, by contrast, did not create Baikal (Soviet Cola alternative) for money, but for ideology (Baikal and its association with purity).

Good points, and thank you again for the discussion.

reply