Sexism


I realise that in 1951 people's ideas of sexism was completely different to ours today. However I couldn't get over James Mason's character's overt misogyny. To me it felt like this trait of his was meant to be portrayed as an endearing little quirk of his. Carla only seemed a little put off by this and that irritated me too, that and the fact she proved herself to be the classic "damsel in distress" far too often for my liking. This never usually bothers me in films, and I completely get that "that's the way it was" then, but nevertheless it still annoyed me, probably heightened by the fact I didn't really enjoy the film. Did anyone else feel the same? I was surprised there wasn't already a thread about this:L

reply

Prof. Lindenbrook's attitude toward having a woman on a geological expedition was completely normal for a 19th-century scientist, which is the role he is playing. Whether we agree with that attitude today is neither here nor there. To enjoy films (or novels, or any form of art) depicting earlier historical periods (or cultures other than our own) one has to have the ability to think and feel inside (if only tentatively) that period or culture.

In any case, as others have pointed out, the film shows how baseless the prejudices of Lindenbrook are, as Carla proves to be a valuable member of the expedition, and often shrewder than Lindenbrook. And finally, this film was not meant as serious adult drama, but as light family entertainment, with a strong appeal to kids (dinosaurs and exploration) and to teenagers (Pat Boone and his romancing). The male-female dynamics were not meant to teach anything about the proper place of women; they were meant to be funny. We are meant to take delight in seeing Lindenbrook forced to allow Carla on the mission against his own inclination. It creates a comic situation much like that of the old 30s movies (e.g. Astaire/Rogers) where a male and female lead can't stand each other but fall in love by the end. The film struck me as funny in this respect even when I was a little kid, watching this movie on television, and it still strikes me that way now.

reply

I took a family - law course in college. The instructor--a family law attorney, naturally, was something of a feminist; she spoke in something of an insulting manner of men (long story).
At one point she said it's quite possible--and common--for a man and a woman to engage in a sexual encounter, both willingly, even though they do not like each other. I quipped, "That's their tough luck."

reply

These days, when people see an older movie or TV shows portraying sexism or racism, they say, "Gee, that movie is sexist/racist!"

Who's fault is this?

--
LBJ's mistress on JFK:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WcXeutDmuRA


reply

Very much in agreement with you OldFilmLover.
I first saw this movie in my early teens and still recall being upset over the demise of Gertrude. I also loved the sound track as well as the production values - this remains the film I have watched (entirely) more times than any other!

reply

Yawn. People like you should just avoid any movie made before 1970 since they are all full of racism, sexism, homophobia, xenophobia, and lots of other phobias.

I think people like you just watch old movies so they complain about how scandalized and upset they are.

Did the sexism make you cry?

reply

I hope I end up living long enough to see the day when there will be warning labels and disclaimers put on films of the last twenty years to take note of the PC obsessiveness of those responsible for them.

Those who want to get upset over a film like this, which holds up better than anything of the last two decades IMO as good cinematic entertainment, simply because it doesn't follow modern PC dictates need to get a life.

reply

Amen to that. And I am a card-carrying feminist.

reply