Any good?


It's just came on the tube and I'm about to watch it. I'll BE BACK! to post how it was. Cool Babs.

_______________________________________
Nick "A hell of a great guy! NOT!"

reply

I happened to rent this from NETFLIX because it looked like a good film-noir crime drama. It turned out to be one of the most BIZARRE films that I have ever seen. Considering the outstanding cast, this botch job makes "Ed Wood" look like David Lean. Still, there is something quite interesting about the effort being made here to break new ground about the reality of the "Ozzie and Harriet" fantasy world of the 50's, when I was a teen-ager. For a car buff my age, the cars alone are worth the DVD rental. There are a lot of good reader reviews on the IMDB if you want to get more information.

reply


It's pretty bad, but a Stanwyck flick is like pizza - even when it's bad,
it's good. She's worth viewing in anything, good or bad.

reply

Barbara Stanwyck was, at times, kind of interesting in this film, but it's still a B-movie and her conflicts are characteristically overwrought and over-acted. I think her work from the 50s on was mostly pretty bad. Including performances like this one and ESPECIALLY her part in what could have or should have been a great film with a dream cast and crew, "Clash By Night". When I think of her best work, I like to think of movies, like, "Baby Face", "Strange Love of Martha Ivers" or, of course, "Double Indemnity".

Surprisingly, Sterling Hayden was actually quite good. I don't think of him as an actor of incredible range but he was perfectly suited to this part.

All these Raymond Burr as bad guy movies from the 50s all seem to have the same, pseudo-cheesy, TV-like, B-movie quality to them, I think especially because of his contribution. I see him in a film like this and I instantly think, "okay, this must not have been an A-picture".

reply


I completely disagree, particularly regarding "Clash By Night", which I
feel is not only an underrated film but one of Stanwyck's best
performances. She is letter-perfect in that film and brings so much to
a complex and, frankly, unlikable character. Everyone is superb in
that boozy, moody film.

I also agree with the higly respected British critic and author David
Shipman who wrote, "In fact, she (Stanwyck) never gave a bad performance."
And, while acknoledging that many of her '50s programmers were pretty
bad, he praised her performances, noting she was "often the only
professional thing in them." I agree. She was the best.

reply

'It's pretty bad, but a Stanwyck flick is like pizza - even when it's bad,
it's good. She's worth viewing in anything, good or bad.'

couldn't agree more -- both on Stanwyck, and the pizza......


Nothing like cold pizza for breakfast!! - with coffee or coke..

reply

If you want something odd, slow moving and unsatisfying, here's your film.

reply

It was bizarre but I liked it. LOVED the cars, 56 Merc Conv, 51 Ford Conv that gets wrecked at the beginning.

reply

I thoroughly enjoyed every aspect of it. Not that she's bad at all...quite the contrary, but yes, even theoretically BAD Babs is better than no Babs at all.

reply

I thoroughly enjoyed every aspect of it. Not that she's bad at all...quite the contrary, but yes, even theoretically BAD Babs is better than no Babs at all.

reply

Crime of Passion delivers itself to the viewer with the ease of a steadily poured glass of milk. Both the story and performances maintain an even keel from start to finish.

If placed on a scale ranged from 0 to 100 with other films of similar quality it will likely always place somewhere between 75 - 100. In some ways weak, but by far not the worst. In many ways strong but, perhaps arguably, not the best.

Perhaps the weakest element is that one has to accept a sort of fish out of water subtext. Where a career woman, who gives up her smart-alecky newspaper position to become an unsatisfied suburban housewife, rather than use the cunning and intelligence that had brought her success as a single woman, instead doggedly devotes herself to elevating the status of her husband. Seized by petty jealousies and desire to do better than the Joneses she commits sly and, eventually, heinous acts.

However, the film was made at a time when most people might’ve more readily bought into this scenario as a generally accepted (though largely false) view of American women. A world where ‘good’ women readily yield to their husbands, are overly class conscious and, when it comes to other women, catty to boot.

Accept this and the film holds together pretty well. Don’t accept it and, though the character flaw mentioned above will ring a false note, the performances and story still move along to a smooth, rational conclusion.

If you need a big shock of an ending to feel satisfaction this film won’t give it to you. If you can be pleased with a basic good story delivered with basic good acting you’ll find it a comfortable experience.

Only the a viewer of limited exposure can be entirely thrilled by this film but, conversely, only an obstinate perfectionist can be entirely displeased with it.


"Your thinking is untidy, like most so-called thinking today." (Murder, My Sweet)

reply

Basically, no. It's no Double Indemnity or Strange Love of Martha Ivers. Stanwyck is a bit past her prime here. I found it to be a dull domestic drama but maybe you like these sort of movies, I don't know. If you like movies like Leave Her To Heaven you might like this one. I like film noir with some grit.

reply

Well? we're waiting!! you've had nearly 12 years to bang out a review, lol.
It's now on youtube if you need a recap :)

reply

Stanwyck, Hayden, and Burr were very good, but it's just not plausible that this woman went from being a rational, normal person to being a scheming, hysterical mental case who plugged a guy in the head. It just isn't believable.

reply