MovieChat Forums > High Society (1956) Discussion > Grace Kelly imitating Katherine Hepburn

Grace Kelly imitating Katherine Hepburn


Don't get me wrong, in general, I'm a fan of Grace Kelly. But am I the only one who noticed that she really seemed to be imitating Katherine Hepburn's manner of speaking for this movie?

KH has a very distinct speaking pattern that worked very well as Tracy Lords. And the whole time I watched High Society (which I enjoyed), I felt like I wasn't watching Grace Kelly as Tracy Lords, but, rather, Grace Kelly as Katherine Hepburn as Tracy Lords.

Am I the only one who noticed that?

reply

I don't hear or see an imitation.

One could make this comparison for almost every character in "High Society". Much of the first script is copied in the second. They have a lot of similar lines in similar situations. Since the plot is generally the same, having the actors interpret the characters the same way isn't really all that unusual. It's not as if they hired Marlon Brando to remake a role like he did with Fletcher Christian in "Mutiny on the Bounty".

Although Grace Kelly didn't make the hundreds of miles of film that Katherine Hepburn did, there is enough footage to say that it's her accent and delivery in "High Society". Catch "Rear Window", or "To Catch a Thief". She sounds like Grace Kelly there too.

Hepburn's pauses and her nasal tones, especially with the more "goddess-like" lines in "The Philadelphia Story" were more in line with that film's sharper script. Grace's affectations come nowhere near Kate's. Appropriately so, because the "High Society" script doesn't jab like the original. Quite frankly, sometimes it just lays there. The musical interludes, as fun as they are in themselves, loosen the plot strings even further.

None-the-less, I like "High Society", just not as much as I like "The Philadelphia Story". I feel both Tracy Lords are genuine to the actress playing the role.

In a slightly related matter, It does seem ironic that Katherine Hepburn, a New Englander, plays the Philadelphia Tracy Lord and Grace Kelly, a Philadelphia socialite, plays the Newport, Rhode Island Tracy Lord.

reply

It's curious to me that you don't hear or see an imitation when you also state much of the first script [Philadelphia Story] is copied in the second [High Society].

In a nutshell you've described why I do not like - and can't even watch - High Society with Grace Kelly's impersonation of Hepburn. It's dreadful...and I love Grace in both the Hitchcock films that you mention.

The little that I've viewed of this movie shows Crosby owning his performance of Dex, and I also think Sinatra brought more life to George than Jimmy Stewart. Why Grace Kelly imitated Hepburn word for word and gesture for gesture is a mystery and a complete FAIL to me, and the only reason I find this film unwatchable.

I'm truly not trying to offend or even argue with you here, in fact I owe you a 'thanks' for succinctly phrasing my exact problem with this film.


reply

Your response got me thinking. Seasoned performers do things that are seamless in the final product. A good example is Jimmy Stewart in "Anatomy of a Murder".

I read the shooting script while watching "Anatomy of a Murder" last year--interesting variations. In particular, Jimmy Stewart changed almost all of his lines to fit the "Jimmy Stewart Persona". Not just the pauses and the stuttering, but the actual words. AND he changed them in a good way, making the story stronger with "himself" as the main character. It was a wonderful experience to see/read this film.

Extrapolating that idea across performances in "High Society"--Bing's screen personality was a long and winding, but well defined, road. Sinatra played his radio personality. Celeste Holm, well she's Celeste Holm, a complete and utter pro capable of any interpretation required. Other roles I'll ignore for the sake of brevity, a battle I seem to be losing.

So the lack of polish in Grace Kelly's final film performance, which incidentally may have bearing on the matter, becomes interesting in this light. Under Hitch in "To Catch a Thief" and "Rear Window" and Zinnemann in "High Noon" she had very strong direction. The "High Society" director, Charles Walters, started as a dancer and mostly directed musicals, sometimes with temperamental stars. It's possible that was not what she needed.

It's also possible that she couldn't change the script to her version of a "Jimmy Stewart Persona" because her acting experience, mostly TV and a few films, was not that of more experienced actors of similar fame. In this regard, she does seem to read the lines and not make them her own in "High Society".

So your critique is well received, albeit with two exceptions.

First, the script is not the acting. They speak the same words because it's the same story. They sound so similar because in real life they were both privileged, rich, east coast debutantes whose accents happened be geographically separated by New York City. Still, Grace looks and sounds like Grace, and Katherine looks and sounds like Katherine. Leon Redbone sounds like Bing Crosby singing "White Christmas" because "White Chritmas" is a Bing Crosby song. But when you listen closely the interpretations are quite different and unique to their performers even with the same "script".

Second, "High Society" is not unwatchable. Any movie that begins and ends Louis Armstrong just can not possibly be unwatchable! This, of course, should have nothing to do with critiquing a film, but the film starts with Louis Armstrong and ends with Louis Armstrong, and has a Louis Armstrong number in the middle, and there is nothing I can do to change that, which is a good thing.

reply

but the film starts with Louis Armstrong and ends with Louis Armstrong, and has a Louis Armstrong number in the middle


Now You Has Jazz is an unbelievably satisfying number for me; almost breaks "the 4th wall" but is really a wonderful tribute to Louie and the band within the context of the movie.
Under Hitch in "Vertigo" and "Rear Window" and Zinnemann in "High Noon" she had very strong direction. The "High Society" director, Charles Walters, started as a dancer and mostly directed musicals, sometimes with temperamental stars.


Kim Novak starred in Vertigo so I'm fairly certain you meant "Catch a Thief" with Cary Grant. (Odd to note but Vertigo is one of my least favorite Hitchcock films so I know it wasn't Grace Kelly, lol.) It is very possible that Kelly needed stronger direction than a director who does musicals.

I think I understand your point that both actresses sound like themselves, but if I wasn't looking at the TV and seeing the picture I would wonder why Katherine Hepburn didn't sound right. Oh wait - she's singing - and then belatedly I would know it wasn't Philadelphia Story I was hearing.

Of course you're right, the movie isn't 'unwatchable'. It's just unwatchable for me when Kelly is speaking onscreen.

reply

For all the complaints about Grace Kelly imitating Katharine Hepburn -- and I thought Grace Kelly was delightful, by the way -- you'd think that those posting the complaints could spell Katharine Hepburn's first name correctly.

reply

Good point!

reply

I think it's time to come to grips with the pathetic fact that accurate spelling is a lost art.

reply

Its one of the first things I noticed, too. She appeared to be trying to mimic Hepburn and I think that ruined the movie for me. The Philadelphia Story is one of my all-time favorite films, so I was kind of interested to see a different take on it. I think it missed the mark.


My memory foam pillow says it can't remember my face. I can tell its lying.

reply