was Richard insane?


The thought was running through my mind the entire film. If he's not medically or technically insane, I'm sure he would be deemed so if tested. He has almost schizophrenic qualities. The way he talks to himself is so annoying, and is reminiscent of Hamlet, who actually was insane (well, some would argue he's not but let's not get into that). And the fantasies, the paranoia, it all points to insanity. Anyway, insane or not, I hated his character. He was so annoying. I don't know if Wilder was going for "cute" or "funny" with this character, but I felt he was more annoying than anything. I read that, in the play, Richard had an inner voice that was almost like a character on it's own, and I think that if they would have included that in the film, it would've been miles better.

reply

It was his imagination. No he wasn't insane.
Read the play on which the movie was based.

reply

Yes. He was completely insane. He constantly talks to himself throughout the movie.

reply

He was BORED and LONELY. Not INSANE.

"In Vino Veritas"

reply

Not to mention, how are we supposed to know what the guy is thinking when nobody's around unless he talks to himself?

---
"24 hours a day, 7 days a week. No job is too big. No fee is too big!"---Ghostbusters

reply

Very good point.

"In Vino Veritas"

reply

[deleted]

Ewell was perfect in this role.

reply