MovieChat Forums > Pather Panchali (1955) Discussion > Bad luck or punishment? Spoilers!!!

Bad luck or punishment? Spoilers!!!


Was all this a punishment for bad behaviour? Because the mother had treated the aunt so badly and because the sister was stealing all the time? It is hinted upon in the end when Apu finds the beads and the spider runs away from the hiding place. Remember that the film starts with the sister stealing. It is amazing how scary Ray manages to make this scene. It is like looking at a cancer which has been festering all this time an causing all this mishaps, like a symbol of sin. Is this the reason they had a run of bad luck? Ray does how ever never say if it is a punishment or not. He leaves it open for the viewer. And never again in this trilogy will we see such moralisation. The closest we come to it in another of his films is in The Music Room.

Another interesting point. The woman who owns the garden that the sister was always stealing from comes with a basket of fruits to them when they are leaving. Why not give them fruits when they needed help instead of complaining about them and giving them a bad name. So this opens up the question of who committed a bigger sin. :)


- No animal was hurt during the making of this burger -

reply

"Was this all punishment...?"

No. She needs to steal because they are so poor. The woman who owns the garden has committed the bigger "sin" (not that the concept makes much sense given the cultural context), since she cheated the garden out of the father, causing them to go hungry.

reply

Also, Durga death was a direct result of their poverty (notice the wind coming in during the storm, and the house falling apart, unable to protect her and exposing her to the cruel elements. Her death causes the family's neighbours realise how badly behaved they have been, and they become good (perhaps).

reply

[deleted]

I think the whole purpose of apu discovering the beads at the end was to show how he has grown up post his sister's death. He throws the beads away into a slimy pond thereby eradicating the only minor blemish in his beloved sisters life. Ray here shows us how preservation of human dignity is a priority even among people living in abject poverty. To think that durga's death was a punishment for her petty crimes is being rather heavy handed. Children tend to have a propensity to steal things which they find attractive.Ray here does not moralise, he observes. The misfortune which struck the family is quite likely for people living in such poverty.

reply

I had a similar reaction as you did, but I don't think that the fate of the mother or the sister is meant as punishment for their bad behavior. Rather, I think this film is very sensitive and subtle in its portrayal of its characters as deeply flawed, yet characters that we can identify with and love. Durga is a thief, and the mother is unnecessarily cruel to Auntie. But yet both are characters with really strong and kind qualities. It is emblematic of the richness of this film, and I don't think it's appropriate to boil it down to their fate being a "punishment" for their flaws.

reply

It was the father's casual absenteeism from his family's needs that led to both the stealing and the house's ineffectiveness as shelter: in his easygoing way he failed to provide either adequate sustenance or protection (or discipline). If anyone is to blame, it's him through direct cause and effect rather than some karmic curse on the daughter.

reply

The father ended all his letters with a phrase such as, "Whatever God ordains for us is right."

reply