MovieChat Forums > Niagara Discussion > the husband/salesman guy was really, rea...

the husband/salesman guy was really, really, really BAD!!!


The guy who played the husband of the lady (not Monroe, the OTHER lady no one pays attention to)... Oh my GOD he was so bad in this... He looked like a permanant clown-joker with that dumb smile, and it was as if he were reading all his lines... He was one of Molly Ringwalds goofy grandpa's in 16CANDLES (he comments on her breats having grown, a funny scene), and was much better in that, a comedy... But in this film, a drama, he was really miscast... he never stopped smiling and laughing...

EMO KIDS WITH GLASSES; LET US KICK THEIR ASSES

reply

A lot of people have problems with him, and I tend to agree with you, and them.

I really want to hit him - hard - when he obnoxiously insists his wife just had a bad dream and shoos the detective away !!

He's just too "on."

But in the long run, he fits the bill. An other actor, playing it straight, might have been a total snooze in what could have been a throwaway role.

reply

He was another clueless husband, sort of a mirror image of Joseph Cotten.

The guy is on his honeymoon with foxy Jean Peters and he brings along books to read. Even I could do better than that...




"Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain."

reply

I noticed that too. He seems distracted by his work and she seems more interested in what's going on with George and Rose.

reply

Well, I thought Casey Adams was just playing the character as it was written. The guy is supposed to be kind of a yakky slightly boorish salesman type, the kind that gets under your skin. Apparently he played it quite successfully considering some people have negative reactions to the character!

reply

[deleted]

ya he didnt do that great... he was smiling like an idiot the whole time.

reply

He not only brings books to read on his honeymoon, he openly checks out Monroe and keeps telling his new wife how hot Monroe is.

reply

"not Monroe, the OTHER lady no one pays attention to)... "
lol

_________________________
Don't you know that a man being rich is like a girl being pretty?

reply

Don't want to put the man down but he also really annoyed me. To my surprise he's been in 82 films though!!

He would make outrageous claims like he invented the question mark.

reply

[deleted]

He was funny sometimes, saying "Mr. Loomis!" in a tone like he was sick of the whole mess.

reply

Heck, people, he had won a contest, he was on a honeymoon he and his wife hadn't gotten to have in the first place, and he was meeting his boss there! For a salesman, especially in the Fifties, of course he was laughing and joking a lot! Remember his boss?! I would expect someone that jovial would want his employees to be somewhat like that. Anyway, most of the salesmen I've met have tended to be like him, smiling, making a joke when necessary, and shaking hands, usually briskly. Casey/Max is PERFECT in that role!

He is NOT saying that his wife should be like Rose, someone he obviously doesn't care for after knowing her and her husband for a while! He obviously thinks she's beautiful as she is, and likely as curvy, even though she denies it. He thinks she would look great in a red dress like Rose's, and he tries to tease her into posing provocatively because he's proud of her! Do you see him trying to sneak a picture of Rose? No! He's a "regular Joe", a guy who was a soldier at one point, returning to civilian life to land a nice job in a "big name" company; we know he is doing well, climbing the ladder of success, as is said. His boss likes him, and they're even introduced to his wife, who also is full of smiles and laughter. Hey! I've worked at places that expected everyone to have that sort of attitude. Today's glum slackers wouldn't have lasted five minutes at these jobs in the Fifties, Sixties and even Seventies.

So, leave the guy alone! He's as all-American as you could get at that time, but he has his moments where he does get a tad irritated, remember? Max/Casey is my favorite character next to Marilyn's Rose. Jean Peters could have been played by anyone to me, and Joseph Cotten is in his troubled mode (I like him in other roles much better).

By the way: Remember the guy in the "Twilight Zone" episode "It's a Good Life"~the one who plays the piano at the birthday party? That's Max/Casey! Another role of his I like is as the man who tries to act happy that his girl has broken off the engagement in "How to Murder Your Wife". If I recall correctly, he plays the piano then, too.

EDIT: I'm nearly to the end of "Elmer Gantry". OMG! I forgot he's in this film, too! He's the deaf man Sister Sharon heals! How could I forget that role?!

~~MystMoonstruck~~

reply

cynsemel you were spot on in your take of Max/Casey this guy and his boss (who was the announcer for Kraft on some 50's show) were perfectly in tune with the post WW2 generation. I remember my dad and mom and their friends sitting outside the house on summer nights (yes people actually sat around outside with their neighbors and guess what, us kids were allowed to stay outside with them....can you imagine no video games or tv or cell phones, just us neighborhood kids chasing fireflies and looking for sputnick! and it was glorious) and talking and laughing just like these guys....they had been through the worst and now were ready to enjoy their lives. Thanks for your insight.

reply

"who was the announcer for Kraft on some 50's show"

I think it's interesting that this commenter remembers who the commercial sponsor of "some '50s show" was, but doesn't remember that it was superstar Jack Benny's show. I guess that's effective advertising.

reply

/Max is PERFECT in that role!


I think so, too.
He was only playing the part as it was written.
(And the part was characterised very early on, and very clearly, by that book he is bringing to read on his honeymoon - remember? ;))

Judging by the reactions, he was very successful.





reply

I agree, in fact I was looking for a thread just like this because I thought the acting and overall performance from this guy just brought the movie down. I could not enjoy it because of this stupid, goofy performance. I hope he got chewed out a lot for that b.s.

reply

Ahem! Actors are doing mainly what the director wants, especially in that period of time under the studio system. He delivers a terrific performance as a "glad-hand" type salesman who could win a top award at a major company. He's living the American Dream at that point, including being married to a sweet, smart, beautiful lady, succeeding at a god job at a successful company, and making an impression on his boss, meaning that he will be rewarded with raises, prestige, etc., perhaps climbing up that company ladder.

You're just used to all of the Slackers in the workplace~on-screen and off, people who couldn't show enthusiasm if their lives depended on it. Once upon a time, it was so different.

Again: This fine character actor delivers the performance required in exactly the way he was supposed to do it. He would not have been "chewed out a lot for that", not for doing what the script and the director demanded! Maybe people have to know something about that time period to understand the movie as we who lived through it do. *SIGH* Some people will never understand, but I'll keep defending this performance, being a fan of the actor, whichever name he uses: Casey Adams or Max Showalter.

~~MystMoonstruck~~

reply



Well... yes, of course.
I don't know about others, but I was agreeing with you.



reply

Check out what dkm0015 wrote. That's what had me up in arms, defending Max/Casey. I'm happy to see that others are supportive of this actor and his spot-on performances, especially in "Niagara".

~~MystMoonstruck~~

reply


Oh - sorry!
My reply being the last one, I thought... well, you get the picture. ;)





reply

Check him out as Tuesday Weld's father in "Lord Love a Duck", especially in the "cashmere sweater" scene--a bizarre, twisted, and extremely funny performance.

reply

I wanted to hit him with that wrench...

Quit calling everybody "slacker."

The amount of creative emotion showed by your so-called "slacker" generation blows this tepid performance out of the water. And just try to find a movie where a little dink like him strong-arms/pulls around his WAY ABOVE HIS LEAGUE wife, like she's a sack. She could have found MUCH better.

Try to push around a detective assigned to a crime like he was, today. You'll find yourself in cuffs.



this postage has been deleted by the messer

reply

A regular guy - who is probably going to grow up to be just like his boss some day. His lack of neurosis is a nice contrast to the tortured soul of Loomis. He just wouldn't have a clue about what goes on in those crazy peoples' heads, unlike his more imaginative wife. His fear and concern at the end was touching. Good job.





"Fortunately, I keep my feathers numbered for just such an emergency."

reply

I've probably seen most of Max Showalter's/Casey Adams's films, and he's terrible in just about every one of them. That froggy grin that never goes away, the over-enthusiastic line readings, that's part and parcel of every performance of his I ever saw, save for the one in Elmer Gantry, where he's terribly miscast but comes the closest he ever came to giving a true performance. I was around when this movie came out, and if you think his performance is simply "typical" of that era, I suggest you take a look at the work Spencer Tracy and Marlon Brando and Walter Brennan and Ernest Borgnine and Kirk Douglas were doing at the same time. Everyone I've talked to who knew Showalter had good things to say about him, but I cringe every time I see him in a film, because he seems incapable of doing much besides Mr. Too-Happy. His performance in Niagara is probably the worst of the lot, and it's hard to imagine a sensible and spectacular-looking woman such as Jean Peters played ever tolerating this guy for more than a minute. The only one worse than him in the film is Don Wilson, but Wilson's playing a moron. He's bad, but he's supposed to be innervating. Showalter/Adams isn't supposed to be, but he is. He wrecked the movie for me. As he often does.

reply

I so agree with JimB-4. This was an awful performance in an otherwise riveting film. I agree that the character was supposed to be conventional and shallow, but he didn't HAVE to have a big, meaningless, goofy grin on his face the whole time. And it's NOT the way all "regular guys" were portrayed in films from the 50's, as you point out. He was funny as Grandpa Fred, though.

reply

I've probably seen most of Max Showalter's/Casey Adams's films, and he's terrible in just about every one of them. That froggy grin that never goes away, the over-enthusiastic line readings, that's part and parcel of every performance of his I ever saw, save for the one in Elmer Gantry, where he's terribly miscast but comes the closest he ever came to giving a true performance. I was around when this movie came out, and if you think his performance is simply "typical" of that era, I suggest you take a look at the work Spencer Tracy and Marlon Brando and Walter Brennan and Ernest Borgnine and Kirk Douglas were doing at the same time. Everyone I've talked to who knew Showalter had good things to say about him, but I cringe every time I see him in a film, because he seems incapable of doing much besides Mr. Too-Happy. His performance in Niagara is probably the worst of the lot, and it's hard to imagine a sensible and spectacular-looking woman such as Jean Peters played ever tolerating this guy for more than a minute. The only one worse than him in the film is Don Wilson, but Wilson's playing a moron. He's bad, but he's supposed to be innervating. Showalter/Adams isn't supposed to be, but he is. He wrecked the movie for me. As he often does.


He ruined the film.
It had so many things going for it - that made it really good. If he wasn't in it, it would have been MUCH better. I try to avoid watching it because I'll end up wanting to punch the screen. Again.

reply

Haha... I agree! As soon as I saw him I knew I'd seen him somewhere before. Then, like 5 minutes later I realized that he was Grandpa Fred from "Sixteen Candles"! His stupid smile was so irritating! He smiled in about 98% of his scenes.

It also bothered me how he refused to listen to Polly when she told him that she had seen George. As if a murder couldn't be nearly as important as his stupid fishing trip with his numbskull boss, who was equally irritating.





























5

reply

You've only pointed out that he was a good character actor, how many supporting players of the 1950's were still working in 1980's movies?

reply

[deleted]