MovieChat Forums > Monsieur Verdoux (1947) Discussion > I DON'T GET IT................... ... CA...

I DON'T GET IT................... ... CAN SOMEONE EXPLAIN ?


What has this movie to do with capitalism ? And why was this unsuccessful in america during the time of the release ?

Yes, I do understand that the ladies he marry in this movie all are either self-centered, rich and spoiled in character. But that has more to do with the culture of america and less to do with capitalism.

reply

[deleted]

Yes steve I know that. I understand thats one of the reason why the movie didn't do that good at the time of the release.

But still people say this movie has something to do with capitalism.

This is what is written in the wikipedia about the plot of the movie. The film's premise is that "murder is the logical extension of capitalism". The lead character kills to make money, hence he is not (in his eyes) a murderer.

I mean seriously do you really think chaplin was thinking that way ? How many people could've seen it that way ?

reply

[deleted]

The criticism of capitalism is very explicit. Ms. Verdoux loses his job in a bank because of "the great crisis" (1920's). He thinks capitalism is brutal and inhuman. Something snaps in his psyche and he begins to perform individually what he believes "the system" is doing mercilessly to the masses of workers and employees.

reply

He justified his methods by saying that the authorities were doing the same thing.

reply

[deleted]

You are right Ulzana. Thanx

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

The fact that you asked the question shows how absurd Chaplin's linkage was. Most normal people don't think killing wives for their money as "Business". Chaplin blah, blahed about "capitalism" to justify a bad movie. It was "unsuccessful" because the comedy really isn't funny - except when Raye is around - and its not a particularly compelling drama or character study.

That lots of lefties SAY its a great movie means nothing.

reply

Did you miss the part at the end when the derelict Verdoux helped explains that she married a munitions maker and that the business "will pay big dividends soon"? Verdoux killed a dozen or so, but her husband's bombs will kill thousands. Both are in it for the money.

reply

"Everyone has a mortgage to pay."



Madi

reply

I'm not sure, but I think Verdoux thinks he is "simply" turning a metaphor about business ("cutthroat competition") into a reality and also perhaps taking back what was illicitly or even murderously acquired in the first place. (Capitalism needs additional markets in order to grow and historically, new markets were often found at the end of a gun).

reply

The fact that you asked the question shows how absurd Chaplin's linkage was. Most normal people don't think killing wives for their money as "Business". Chaplin blah, blahed about "capitalism" to justify a bad movie.


As much as I enjoyed Monsieur Verdoux, it is hard to see how Verdoux can justify his actions by stating that the International community does worse in causing war. Despite Chaplin's intention, it comes across as a weak defense of Verdoux's character. The Great Dictator conveys the anti-war message much better.

I'd rather be hated for who I am, than loved for who I am not.

reply

The dog-eat-dog of the business world is critiqued throughout and it skewers the hypocrisy of becoming wealthy based on mass-murder being tolerated but a small sum gained for several murders is a crime.

reply