MovieChat Forums > The Bachelor and the Bobby-Soxer (1947) Discussion > First impression: Shirley Temple is...

First impression: Shirley Temple is...


Shirley Temple is an awful actress!

reply

It wasn't just that she was a terrible actress, it was that she was doing her schtick from her children's movies. It was cute when she was little. It was getting less cute as she became older and retirement loomed in.
As a teen, it was ridiculous and annoying. Some women must have evidently used that type of simpering little girl act in real life and some men fell for it, but no way could it have been normal teen behavior in that time of the late 40s.
I am surprised that there weren't more comments on this. I think her role was the one really false note in this fun comedy. She was like finger nails on a blackboard to me!

reply

Yeah, it was a bit of a distraction. It always is when you notice someone trying to fill a role, and only semi-successfully.

Obviously, they were playing off her enormous popularity. But as you note, the cutesy little girl act didn't quite come off as genuine. Shirley was in over her head among some very heavy weight actors of the day.



Democracy is the pathetic belief in the collective wisdom of individual ignorance. H.L. Mencken

reply

I am hardly a Shirley Temple fan. The great great western Fort Apache, with John Wayne, Henry Fonda, a great supporting cast, and directed by John Ford - all the makings of a ten for ten in my book - got taken down to a nine solely due to her (in that film) odious presence. For example.

But... here I did not find her the negative presence she was in at least some of her other films. I think that is surprising, since an obvious explanation might have been that she was older in The Bachelor. Age taking off her rough edges maybe? But no, in fact Fort Apache was hte more recently made film. She in fact was younger here than in FA.

I think you have to give her some credit for making her character less obnoxious than she could have quite easily been. As written the character would have most easily been made plausible if played as a spoiled brat. Instead Ms. Temple mixed in some niceness, some thoughtfulness, in with the immaturity, and somehow it came off as no less plausible than a purely obnoxious portrayal might have been.

In fact my main problem with the film was how the characters were written. The performances were all quite good to excellent.

reply

bctelecom says > Shirley Temple is an awful actress!
How ridiculous! Shirley did a great job in this movie as she had in others. She played the role perfectly; just as it was supposed to be played. Perhaps you are confusing her behavior with the teen roles of today.

Also, Shirley was still, for the most part, being typecast. By the time this movie was made she was a married woman but she was still seen as a little girl. She never got a chance to do anything with more depth. People blame her for still being cutesy and acting as she had when she was a child yet that's exactly what everyone expected of her. How despicable! I see a lot of fairly famous actors who couldn't hold a candle to Shirley; they couldn't act their way out of a paper bag yet they're given credit for their 'talent'; mostly because they show a lot of flesh.

Don't mess with Shirley!


Woman, man! That's the way it should be Tarzan. [Tarzan and his mate]

reply

I'm not a young Shirley Temple fan, but I think she was awesome in this movie. She was over the to because teenagers are ALWAYS OVER THE TOP. This is one of my top ten Cary Grant films just because if Myrna Loy and Shirley Temple.

reply

Yes, she was perfect in this role. The relentlessly miserable and obnoxious teenage girl paradigm that dominates movies today hadn't been invented yet.

reply