MovieChat Forums > Blood on the Sun (1945) Discussion > This is racist garbage. Avoid it.

This is racist garbage. Avoid it.


Anyone reading these words, please avoid this racist garbage. Or, if you had the misfortune to watch it, don't publicize the fact that you did.

reply


Look at the depiction of other races in the films of that time, especially prior to then. Most films were like this. Also at the time, America was at war with Japan, so they're basically sticking it to them so to speak.

I actually quite enjoyed the film as I'm a James Cagney fan.



-------------------
"I've never seen a sight, that didn't look better lookin' back".

reply

Yes it is racist. I particularly object to the main roles of Asian people being played by caucasian actors. But it's oversimplying matters to simple call it 'racist garbage'. Look at the context, this film was obviously supposed to be a war propaganda film.

reply

Exactly. War propaganda. There were many Chinese and Korean Americans who were happy to play Japanese parts. Their ancestors countries has suffered under Japan.

Considering it's pro American anti Japanese bias, it's actually an interesting film. Cagney had a personal stake in this film.

reply

You little uneducated fool...you do realize fascist Japan was bent on conquering and slaughtering as many Chinese and other Asians as they could during that time?

There were a lot of real angry Asian Americans who joined up to fight against Japan and won tons of military decorations. Read a history book for once in your life.

My votes:http://www.imdb.com/mymovies/list?l=9422378

reply

...........I've seen far worse in terms of Asian stereotypes. Ar least this time out the anti militarist movement, in Japan of the nineteen thirties, was discussed, the secret police were very real in Japan, as in other fascist states, as were the atrocities in China. Also James Cagney's character had a lot of respect for Japanese culture. Given the fact the United States was at war with Japan at the time the movie was very restrained.........The movie had Europeans cast as Asians, but during the thirties yellow face casting was common. Even Charlie Chan was played by Warner Oland who was born in Sweden.
TAG LINE: True genius is a beautiful thing, but ignorance is ugly to the bone.

reply

This movie was certainly not "racist." Some of Japs were portrayed as good guys, some bad. Some of the Americans were pretty bad guys, too. The movie portrayed a love relationship between a Caucasian man and an Oriental woman. Why is having Occidental actors play Japanese or Chinese characters racist? American actors commonly play Germans, or Italians, French and otherwise, and nobody complains. Itallians make many movies with their race playing Americans, often in a very sterotyped way, which we just think is funny.

Little prigs who go around always accusing others of racism and other non-pc behavior and attitudes, are usually the most biased and misanthropic people of all. Politically correct is just another form of puritanism designed to tyranize and control others.

Back in the 1970's I had a black (that was the pc term then, not afroamerican) girl friend who would not date back guys. She said they were brutish and boring (even more so than the average man, she said). He favorite actor was Clark Gable, her favorite movie Gone With The Wind. I guess she was a racist.

The Japanese were certainly not discriminatory during WWII. One third of the prisoners of war they brutalized and murdered on the Bataan death march were Filipino. When American troops came back to retake the Phillipines after 3 years of Japanese occupation, the Filipinos cried in effect, "Level our cities with bombs if you have to! Just get rid of the Japs!" The Japanese killed an estimated 20 million Chinese orientals. They used our prisoners for germ warfare experiments. Few Japanese officers and officials were tried for war crimes as compared to those of the caucasian Germans. The victorious Allies did not break their country in the separate pieces as was done to Germany.

We should not buy their cameras and cars. But I have one, a Nissan pickup, and it is the best vehicle I have ever owned in 50 year of driving! Ha so!

He maketh his sun to rise on the evil and on the good... St. Matthew 5:45

reply

there was nothing in this film on the level of Breakfast at Tiffanys for example, now thats real racism

No Justice Just Us

reply

Breakfast at Tiffanys racist? I thought it was just a bad movie, other than the song Moon River. I've seen it long ago and have no desire to see it again.
All I can remember is that Audrey Hepburn was goofer than usual an more irritating than usual, and George Pepard, who is at his best playing brutal cops and such was horribly miscast as a sensitive-like young writer. Is it racist because the caucasion central characters behave like complete morons?

He maketh His sun to rise on the evil and on the good... St. Matthew 5:45

reply

I thought Mickey Rooney was great in "Breakfast at Tiffany's". Its the only good thing about the movie.

"The internet is for lonely people. People should live." Charlton Heston

reply

I didn't remember Mickey Rooney was in it. Maybe it would have been better if he had been the lead. I don't know if he could have handled Holly Golightly without Lewis Stone's advice.

He maketh His sun to rise on the evil and on the good... St. Matthew 5:45

reply

Mickey Rooney played Audrey Hepburn's apartment house neighbor in yellow face, hence he was in it, but his disguise with buck teeth and taped eyelids made that film racist in the opinion of one of the commenters here. When it was made there were many Asian actors available so it was painful to watch him steal his scenes.

reply

When a country is at war, you don't expect the enemy to be portrayed in a good light, do you? Please get real!

reply

I knew there would be someone on here whining about racism.

THE WHINERS ARE THE RACISTS!!

reply

why is all this cry up about this movie? It is obviously a war propoganda movie many of which were ordered into production on US government and a very cooperative Hollywood. I am NOT saying that this is right to portray another person in a bad way just because they are of a different race. But to bash people in our past who did not have the understanding and knowledge that we have today is nievely short thoughtedness. You have to remember the restrictive and narrow view that almost everybody in every country of those times had grown up with. If you look at American isolationism, British territorialism, socialism in Russia, Nazism in Germany, fascism in Italy, Imperialism in Japan... As you can see all the major players of the 1930's preached to their own people of their own superiority over all others in the planet. In modern times we have come to understand that we are part of a global community and while there still exhists in small places parcels of bigotry, fascism and the like as a general rule the world population is now much more mature. But to judge those people of the past by our modern situation and understanding is at least irresponsible theatrics and a form of bigotry and grandiose on behalf of the writer of such drivel.

reply

So, the Japanese raping 80,000 women and young girls in Nanjing in 6 weeks because they were considered "sub-human" isn't racist?

Forcing Korean women (and others) to be "Comfort Women" and service any Japanese soldier at any time because they were considered "sub-human" isn't racist?

Killing 6-8 MILLION Chinese during WWII because they "owned" China isn't racist?

You myopic view of what is "racist" is astounding.

Fucking Millenials.

..Joe

reply