A 8.2 rating really


How is it possible that this movie could only pull a 8.2 rating, its only one of the greatest movies ever made. Why even bother to rate a movie if you haven't seen it, and nobody who ever saw it would give it less then a 10.
Its about as well done as a movie could be done-tackling very deep issue in a way that still makes the movie entertaining, glossing over deep psychological issues with a sheen of romance.
Not one turn of this movie is out of place everything is played out with a certain dignity and respect , nothing is made too melodramatic, Wilder directs with a firm and compassionate hand, a veteran himself he knows the exact tone to set.

reply

[deleted]

possibly because of the age of the viewers:

- most of those who voted are likely younger, post-Gen Xers who only know WWII as having something to do with Pearl Harbor and DDay, not much else.

- filmed in black and white

- no action/special effects to induce video-game like ADHD nirvana

- no over-the-top music score to put on ipods/mp3 players

- too long and in-depth to retain attention

- no TMZ-covered stars in it

Not all, of course, but today's generation doesn't look at history the same since it's not reported on, facebooked or twittered about like current events ... it's out-of-sight/out-of-mind. Still 8.2 is nothing to gripe about considering.

Overall, one of my favorite "classic" movies. It really hits a nerve as it straight-up portrays what the WWII vets dealt with coming home ... kind of rare in those days. I love this film.

reply

@DACHokie--

Your post is almost poetry; I agree with every word. Adult issues, even young adult issues, don't appeal even to young adults in 2014. TBYOOL hits a new nerve every minute of its 2+ hours.

reply

My film professor showed us this film as an example of deep-focus and the entire classed loved it. The most popular film he showed, laughed at all the jokes and got into the story. The professor himself was probably early to mid 30s.

I think it's a case where it's just not shown anymore so younger audiences don't get a chance to see it unless they're like me and a TCM junkie. And a bit of prejudice against black-and-white films,

Still, some people are giving it a low score and it baffles me. Cinematography from Gregg Toland alone means this film deserves a 10. Absolutely a beautifully shot film. Then a wonderful story to boot.

reply

8.2 actually is quite a good rating here at IMDb. "Gone with the Wind" currently has the identical rating, for example.

Considering TBYOOL is an older drama, not a more recent action/fantasy/spectacle film (the kind that are more likely to garner high ratings here), 8.2 is very respectable indeed.

reply

No exploding robots and an audience that finds films like this, Casablanca, Close Encounters of the Third Kind and the original Star Wars to be boring.

reply

[deleted]

I just saw it for the first time at the Revival at the Charles Theater here in Baltimore MD USA. I've heard of it forever, but this was my first time seeing the whole thing. When I got home I gave it a 9. I don't think it's a 10. 1946 was three years before my birth - I have some consciousness of the zeitgeist at that time -- and some of the movie doesn't ring true for me.

From the time Peggy says, "I'm going to break up that marriage" through the ensuing conversation in the bedroom and the confrontation at Butch's between Al and the Dana Andrews character, that just felt "Hollywood" to me -- not the way people would act. Much of the movie had a contrived quality, it seems to me. Touching all the right bases instead of the great writing and flawless acting that comes with a 10.

After sleeping on it, I changed my 9 to an 8. I really really liked the movie. But it was no "It's a Wonderful Life," nor is it as good as "Casablanca" or "The Third Man," to name three that come to mind. To me, 8 is an excellent grade. Four out of 5 stars.

The strong scenes are really strong. People on this board have mentioned Mr Parrish putting Homer to bed -- that is screen magic, and you could have heard a pin drop last night during that scene, not to mention showing his arms to Wilma, which was transformative. This is a great film, a hugely important film, and I expect it will continue to be viewed that way for a very long time to come. Although I think IaWL is a better film, I agree that this deserved Best Picture.



--
GEORGE
And all's fair in love and war?
MRS. BAILEY
[primly] I don't know about war.

reply

From the time Peggy says, "I'm going to break up that marriage" through the ensuing conversation in the bedroom and the confrontation at Butch's between Al and the Dana Andrews character, that just felt "Hollywood" to me -- not the way people would act. Much of the movie had a contrived quality, it seems to me. Touching all the right bases instead of the great writing and flawless acting that comes with a 10.


Lol yeah, some of did feel melodramatic in a funny way. I did like the scene between Fred and Al though. Unlike that ridiculous scene where Fred and Homer threaten that man in the sodashop (God I hate that scene!), it showed that the men (Al anyway) could be sensible. I just wish the silly scenes at the bank and banquet where Al delivers that cringeworthy, drunk speech would've been cut out. -_-"

As for that scene with Homer and his dad, I much, much prefer the scene with March and Loy. She brings him breakfast on his first morning back, it feels anything but "contrived" or "Hollywood." It flowed very naturally, showed they were a little out of step with each other's movements, but that the love for each other was still very much there.

reply

I gave it a 10.

reply

[deleted]