MovieChat Forums > The Sea Hawk (1940) Discussion > Flora Robson, The Best Queen Elizabeth I...

Flora Robson, The Best Queen Elizabeth Interpreter


The role of Queen Elizabeth I of England is very juicy and coveted by many a British stage and film actress, and it's as true now as it was then. Recently, British actress Helen Mirren portrayed the Queen on cable television. Other great and memorable Queen Elizabeths include the great Sarah Bernhardt on stage and in early silent film, Bette Davis (twice, The Private Lives of Elizabeth and Essex (1939) and The Virgin Queen (1955), Glenda Jackson in the BBC series Elizabeth R (1971) and most recently Cate Blanchett in Elizabeth (1998) not to mention Dame Judi Dench for Shakespeare In Love (1998).

While Bette Davis and Glenda Jackson are powerful in their performances as the Queen, Flora Robson is possibly the best interpreter of the role because she seems to be drawing her dramatic energy straight from the universal image of the Queen as imperious, cold and a bit manly. Because she moved and talked the way that people imagined the Queen would, she is the best to my eyes. Flora Robson, too, lost to the competition that was Bette Davis and so she is number one in my book. She seems to have fun doing the part too, more so than the other actresses who seem too involved with the psychological and complex aspects of the Queen.

If you like Flora Robson as the Queen, look for her in Fire Over England (1937).

reply

I've only seen Judi Dench and Robson in their QE1 portrayals, they were different but very well done. Obviously Academy Award voters liked Dench very much as well since she won Best Supporting Actress in a very limited role. I thought she was amazing. So was Robson, and in a bit more serious role.

reply

yes

reply

Flora Robson resembles Helen Mirren and that they both resemble the portraits of Elizabeth I much more than the others?

reply

Now that you mention it yes that's true- though Mirren is a little better-looking than Robson IMO. But she can homely-down as it were! (<: Of course the real QE1 wasn't exactly Princess Di either. I thought Robson was commanding as the queen and absolutely stole every scene she was in- even with the monkey (who was a kick).

reply

bump

reply

I noticed that too, don't be surprised if it turns out that Mirren went back in time to make this film! :p


I agree with the OP about this being my favorite Queen Elizabeth I. Not that I have seen all the other portrayals (so far only Cate Blanchett and part of Glenda Jackson's) but this one went far above and beyond those two. Not only because it was a great portrayal but because it was so unlike the usual acting of that era (which was very theatrical). This one seemed natural, a character with a real personality and not someone pretending to be someone else. It completely stands above the rest of the cast, and I was surprised when I checked and saw that Robson wasn't even nominated for an Oscar for this.

reply

[deleted]

Flora Robson was undoubtedly the best Queen Elizabeth I ever played in the movies...and there have been a few! But Miss Robson was magnificent, and I love the Entrance March, played as she and her lords and ladies paraded into the Throne Room. Wasn't it grand?

reply

I, too, was duly impressed by Flora Robson's portrayal as QE I. In every scene in the film she was assertive and commanding, showing the leadership required of a monarch during a sensitive time of impending war, doing her earnest in trying to avoid same by using diplomacy rather than capitulate to the Sea Hawks to build England's fleet to offset Spain's rumored armada. Watched this swashbuckler as a kid growing up and naturally was caught up in the bravado, leadership, the action and sword play characteristic of Errol in his swashbuckling films with little interest in the role of QE. However, as I watched same after all these years Flora's portrayal as the Queen was the best role in the film. She was magnificent and, surprised, as another poster here in this thread noted, that she was not nominated for an academy award as Best Supporting Actress. Yet, not looking up the history of such for the films nominated that year, likely I won't be surprised at the omission for the Golden Age of Hollywood, imo, was the late 30's and 40's. So many o/s films and portrayals that in some cases one can understand why an actress or an actor wasn't nominated or lost to another. The competition was fierce. Nevertheless, I intend to see her in the same role in a film I've never seen (Fire Over England), just to see her in the same role. What a portrayal and role she had in this movie......O/S.

reply

Robson was radiant, the best Elizabeth ever.

reply

Flora was the best, BY FAR, than any other actress portraying Queen Elizabeth. I'm absolutely stunned she didn't even get nominated for this role. No actress, and there are some very good "queen" role portrayals by Helen Mirren and Cate Blanchett, whom I love dearly, but don't hold a candle to Flora's...

reply