MovieChat Forums > Wuthering Heights (1939) Discussion > Laurence Olivier was sexy as hell

Laurence Olivier was sexy as hell


This is the first film I've ever seen him in, and good god, the man was hot. His face was remarkably beautiful, and those eyes were hypnotic. Also, I only just realized that he was Zeus in Clash of the Titans! Mind BLOWN.

reply

[deleted]

His bio on here says he had French ancestry.

reply

[deleted]

You're welcome. I'll have to look into that. I'd really like to see him in "As You Like It."

reply

[deleted]

Will do!

reply

''Olivier is French for Oliver. I know Laurence was British, but did he get his dark and handsome looks from some French ancestry?''

Oliver/Olivier is from ''Olaf'', a Norse name. He is descended from Normans, who were mostly Danish but spoke French. Obviously they intermarried with the locals too.

---------------------
Haply I may remember,
And haply may forget.

reply

[deleted]

"The Latin races (e.g. Italian, French) are much older than the Scandinavian races."

Eh? They aren't races and it is hard to define "ancestries" as more ancient than others. French are actually Gallic. Their language (a Gallo-Romance language) was formed by the adoption, by Gauls, (in France, Northern Spain and Northern Italy) of the Latin tongue while still retaining substratal features from Gaulish languages; coupled with a heavy influence from Old Frankish (which was actually he ancestor of Old Low Franconian and thus modern Dutch, though not Frisian which though spoken in what is now the Netherlands is an Anglo-Frisian language and thus closely related to English).

Whether or not a "race" (a phrase I laugh at in this regard) or langauges are older is besides the point as words (loanwords as we call them) are borrowsed at different points in time. Incidentally the Franch language is roughly contempory to many of the Germanic and Celtic languages (as in they develped from their mother languages at roughly similar times). Proto-Germanic is contamory with Latin also incidentally and broke from Indo-European at around the same time as most of the Indo-European language groups.) The name Olivieri also dates from around the 1300-1400s and is from the French Olivier (many Italian names are actually Frankish, Lombardic or High German in origin such as Tancredi (brought to Sicily by Normans), Anselmi and Anselmo ("god-helm"), Gandolfi (battle-wolf) and Gandolfini ("of the Gandolfings", Castel Gandolfo being a town in Italy named for the Gandolfi clan), Adolpho (noble-wofl), Bruno (brown), Folco (folk) anyway. There are even English derived ones like Alfredo (elf-council) and Eduino (wealth-friend).

Oliver and Olivier were in fact brought to Britain by the Normans, and yes Olivier is descended from the Normans who were in fact originally Danes and Swedes mostly, and rarely contrary to popular belif Norwegians.

The name's origin isn't actually settled but has been suggested to be from either the West Germanic Alfihar ("elf-host") or the Norse Olafr (suggest as the name was usually borne by Normans. It literally means "ancestor-heir" (An "ancestor" and leifr "left beind, relic") and was sometimes by this point Olver or Oelver). Or it could be indeed from the French 'Olive', though this is unlikely and not the most popular etymology. The original form was, ironically, 'Oliver' (as seen in 'La Chanson de Roland' or 'The Song of Roland') hence the suggestion that it was from Alfihar (which would be from Frankish, much like most of the names of Charlemagne's knights such as Roland which was Hroudland in Frankish) the suggestion being that the much latter form "Olivier" was influenced by "olivier" which means "olive-tree". The commoness of the name amongst Normans was probably due to its similarity to Olafr.

"The game's afoot!"

reply

Yeah, it seems more likely that there are different surnames that have just ended up spelt the same. Olivier for Normans probably did come from Olafr, but, like many Norman names, was Franko-Latinized to make them appear more like the Latinized Frankish names. The Norman name Anchetil is a case in point. The name is from the Norse for ''God-Cauldron'' ''Ásketíll''. The Áss became Ans, which was the Frankish form of the same word.

Laurence Olivier is, seemingly, descended from Normans so his surname is most probably from Olafr, though Normans often did acquire Frankish derived surnames as well, as they became speakers of a Gallo-Romance language littered with Frankish derived words and names.

And anyway, the connection of olive trees is considered by most scholars to be folk etymology, as the first mention of the name is doubtless from the Frankish personal name and not from the Latin ''olivarius''', later ''Olivers'' or ''Oliviers'' are doubtless often from ''Olafr''.

---------------------
Haply I may remember,
And haply may forget.

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

"Pharaoh Impotent, you are wrong. DEAD WRONG! There certainly are Latin races. You shouldn't be laughing at the usage of the word "race" when it's used in a sense that you're unfamiliar with. Race is a word that has many senses, eg:

a) Human race

b) Negroid, Mongoloid, Australoid, Caucasian races

c) Nordic, Alpine, Mediterranean sub-races

d) German race, Latin races

e) canine races (no kidding!) "


The only definitions there with scientific basis are the human race (as a singular) and the "canine races" though it is more usual to talk of the latter as species.

The idea of Nordic, Alpine, Meidterranean, Turanic, Mongoloid, Negroid and [insert any other "race" here] is abhorrant and discredited. They are hang-overs from the era of the "fin de siecle" and the idea of various human races. No valid scientist would agree with those concepts now.

Likewise "German race", "Latin race" etc is equally invalid outside of the era in which "race" could mean anything from family to clan to nation.

As I said earlier, the name "Olivier" is French for "Oliver". How could you possibly not comprehend that "Olivier", as in Laurence's surname, and the French first name "Olivier" are the same name? "Olivier" does not even sound like "Olaf" or "Olafr" (sic!)


The name "Olivier" is the same name as "Oliver"; where have I said it is not? Oliver is actually also the older French form (as found in the poems that make up the 'Chansons De Geste' or "Songs of Brave Deeds"). The latter part is just showing your ignorence of etymology as "Olafr" isn't a "sic" it is the correct Norse form of Olaf or Olav as the Norse usually had a terminal "r" at the end of their names, this derives from the proto-germanic "-az" which became the West Germanic "-as" before being dropped in those languages (Old English, Old High German etc). And it doesn't matter whether or not Olafr (pronounced in Old Norse as "oh-lav-er" incidentally) sounds like Oliver; Roland doesn't sound much like Hroudland either but that is the univerally accepted origin. Does the name Audrey sound like Æðelðryð or Etheldreda? For that is whence that name is derived.

All have phonetic problems but he most accepted etymology of Olivier/Oliver is Alfihar and this fits with the naming system for Charlemagne's knights which are all Frankish.

I don't care what nonsense you have googled, the Italian name Oliviero post-dates the first recording of the French Oliver/Olivier by over a hundred years (as stated previously... actually reading proper literature on the subject shows this). The first recordings of the name Oliver are from the 1000s. The oldest references are from the 1000s where it is Oliver and the Latinised "Oliverus". Later we the form Olivier in Southern French versions of the 'Chanson De Roland' as the "-ier" form originated in that region before becoming common throughout france (but not England where the older form remained). The form "Olivier" thus being a folk-etymology based around a connection to the olive tree (which had a religious significance at the time) and nothing more. Other forms included Olifer and Oliuier.

And the name Oliver/Olivier isn't a surname so it meaning "seller of olives" or "one who dwells by the olive-trees" is highly unlikely on that gound as forenames are not generally formed in such a way, unlike surnames. If it were a surname there would be more of a case to be made but alas there isn't.

The French language is a Romance language derived from the Latin language of the Roman civilization. After Italian words, French words are closer to Latin words than Spanish and Portuguese words are.


The internal divisions of the Romance language groups are contorversial however the Gallo-Romance languages (including the Gallo-Italian languages etc) are closer to the Iberian languages than they are to the Italo-Romance languages though the Iberian languages are closer to the Italo-Romance languages than the Italo-Romance languages are to the Gallo-Romance languages.

I'm not sure where you get the idea that French is closer to Latin than any other Romance language besides Italian from, but, ANY knowledge of the Romance languages will show this to be false. If you want to claim any Romance language is closest to Latin in morphology and lexicon then you will find the language that has the best argument in its favour is Romanian (which preserves more features of Vulgar Latin than Italian does) which is incidentally the most archaic, most remote and least closesly related to the other languages in the family out of all Romance languages. And Spanish and Portugese words are generally morphologically closer to the Latin origins also (hence those languages have more intelligabilty with the Italo-Romance languages).

Laurence Olivier was probably ignorant to his complete ancestral background. But his dark, handsome Romantic looks and surname should prove that he wasn't completely Norman.


Nonsense. Firstly I wouldn't say Olivier looks specifically "Romance" (not that there is anything wrong with looking or not looking "latin". I am part Italian myself but eh... who cares?). Thirdly the French are diverse in the south they looks like Northern Spaniards/Catalonians and in the North like most Englishmen. Secondly the name proves abosolutely nothing as the Normans usually had Latinate or Frankish names (many of which are deriveed from French placenames, especially of places in Calvados which are usually derived from Latin or Gaulish but occasionally Frankish and on a rare occassion Anglo-Frisian). So that claim is nonsense.

Incidentally we know a lot of Olivier's family history, his Olivier line, his descent from the Lord of Arundel via the Hamiltons etc... it isn't hard to find. Whether he has any actual French ancestry is debatable, especially as how would one define French ancestry? Are the Franks French? The Gauls? The Romans? The Flemish? Bretons? Anglo-Frisians? Are the Norsemen/Normans? I don't think ti really matters though the only ancestry we can be sure of (ruling out a non-paternity event) is the latter.

"The game's afoot!"

reply

I came to reply also, though you have said all that really needs to be said about most things, Pharaoh, so I just find myself agreeing with you in my post! You put the good doctor and her amateurish etymological/''racial'' research in their respective places.

Though I'd like to say that anyone who thinks that there is more than one race of humans - whether you go by the VERY discredited Alpine, Nordic, Negroid, Mongoloid etc. of the fin de siecle or chose to go with other racial categorizations - is not really worth the time of day. Such backward thinking ultimately led to the great tragedy of the holocaust and just isn't scientifically sound. Minor differences in ethnic groups do not constitute a race; it is foolish to think so.

And for the record, I knew Scandinavians who look like Olivier, some fairer (true to stereotype!) and some darker (northern Scandinavians can be, and usually are, naturally tanned...more so than Olivier is). The fact remains, as pointed out, we only know that Olivier is Norman (and, if memory serves, ''English'') as we cannot find much evidence that he is, indeed, ''Romance'' at all. ''Olivieri'' is not the acceptable origin for the Norman Olivier family, as Oliver, the knight of legend whose culture the name is more likely from (though Olafr is the second most likely origin of the Norman name...at least due to the equating of similar sounding names with Frankish ones), undoubtedly has a Frankish derived name as all of Charlemagne's knights do. The Italian surname postdates the French name, as Pharaoh has pointed out, so there is no reason to believe that the name has a Latin or later Italian origin; especially as evidence points against it.

And most Normans do not have Norse derived names, so it being from any Latin name - which it isn't! - wouldn't mean they have ancestors that are Romance speakers. The Normans, being a vastly smaller group than the Franks, Bretons and Gallics (though not as small as many seem to think), adopted the French language (which gained a lot of Norse influence due to the original language of the Normans), much of their culture and customs. They usually intermarried with local groups, but that doesn't mean they were all part Gallic (which are the nearest thing to the ''Latins'' you mentioned) as Frankish make up a bigger percentage of the French upper-class and the Bretons were also a nearby group with a Bretonic upper-class - in fact, Normans often married Bretons. William's mother was a Breton and the Breton royal family would become part Norman before the Normans ever set foot in Great Britain. Bretons are, of course, not that closely related to Latins as they are a Brythonic group closely related to the Welsh and Cornish, and closer related to even the Anglo-Saxons due to the fact that both probably have ''Belgic'' influences in genetics and language. Brythons and Saxons, of course, developed in a closer area than the Latins.

Very few French people were actually descended from any Latins as ''Gauls'' made up the majority of the population of France since the Roman era. Some would descend from Roman legionaries and settlers, but most would not. The fact that French is a Gallo-Romance language (note the ''Gallo'' part, indicating the ''Celtic'' Gallic influence) doesn't mean they belong to the same ethnicity as the Italians, and thus the use of the term ''Latin/Romance race'' is even more absurd than it already would be.



---------------------
Haply I may remember,
And haply may forget.

reply

[deleted]

''I'm telling you both that I do not read verbose messages on IMDb.''

In other words, you know you are wrong and thus are leaving with a tail between your legs.

''I find your wordy messages a real turn off and I refuse to bother myself by reading them.''

Don't you find that more an example of your ignorance than anything else?

''You both should learn to say what you want to say in a fewer words''

Perhaps you should probably learn to be more attentive? Not being able to read a post that is a little longer than usual is a sign of immaturity. The post I made was long to be sure, but not long enough to not be able to read within a few minutes. Neither of our posts were ''long reads''.

And if you are not willing to read long replies, don't post asinine comments in the first place.

''When I'm in the mood for a long read, I will settle down with something entertaining like Mitchell's "Gone With the Wind".''

'Gone With The Wind', though amusing in some regards, is moderately racist nonsense. I'd suggest reading something better.

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

''QueenElizabethAngantyr''

I see you are still showing your usual maturity...

''it's often said that British Royals seem like they need more fiber in their diets''

Being as far from a monarchist as you can probably get, I am not at all interested in them at all.

''Incidentally, I still don't read your messages. Whenever I see your user name, I skip the message.''

That is because you are too childish and stupid to read anything that is more than one paragraph...

My advice to you is leaving the internet, try growing up a little more and learn to have some patience for substantial amounts of text.




---------------------
Haply I may remember,
And haply may forget.

reply

"Pharaoh Impotent and KingAngantyr, I'm telling you both that I do not read verbose messages on IMDb. I find your wordy messages a real turn off and I refuse to bother myself by reading them."


Aha, I thought you were that annoying and ignorant member who couldn't read any posts more than a few lines and who deleted their messages and account after making a fool of themselves (something you are now repeating) and now I am certain of it.

"You both should learn to say what you want to say in a fewer words; a short amount of text would be fine. When I'm in the mood for a long read, I will settle down with something entertaining like Mitchell's "Gone With the Wind"."


Come on you couldn't read something like 'Gone With The Wind'; a long read to you is 'The Hungry Caterpillar'.

"The game's afoot!"

reply

[deleted]

''QueenElizabethAngantyr and Pharaoh Unimportant''

Hoho, a keen wit!!!

''don't you both have anything better to do in Britainstan than love on an American TV series?''

Don't you have anything better to do than wallow in ignorance? Perhaps learning to read properly would be more beneficial to your life.

''And get your Elizabeth and her son and grandchildren to eat some too.''

Hahaha, this stupid American actually thinks we care about Queen Elizabeth, Pharaoh, despite the both of us being anti-monarchist socialists. I guess your intention is to try to insult us by mocking our country (which we are not at all fond of), despite the fact that it doesn't work well when we remember that the USA is the most despised country in the entire world, more so than Iran and North Korea. As hated as Britain is, we'll be OK because there is always the USA to make us look more loveable!



---------------------
Haply I may remember,
And haply may forget.

reply

[deleted]

I have three words for you too; imbecilic, juvenile and unfunny.

---------------------
Haply I may remember,
And haply may forget.

reply

[deleted]

Yeah, yeah. You didn't ignore my comment, you child. You should probably delete your account again just as you did after Pharaoh showed you to be a bit of an ass before. You are really embarrassing yourself; I hope you realize this.

I do not really have to post anything to show up someone as juvenile as you and to show how idiotic it is to attempt to insult me based on a country that I am not enamored with and a monarchy I neither like or support.

And I note that your use of ''Britainistan'' plays off of xenophobia and Islamophobia. Nice try, racist imbecile. Not everyone thinks like you.

---------------------
Haply I may remember,
And haply may forget.

reply

[deleted]

''Doctor'' Julia Hoffman, you have actually confirmed that you do not skip my message, by actually replying to a comment I have actually made. That is too funny! What a complete failure at posting, trolling and life in general.

I was going to ignore you but I have realize that watching you make an (unintentionally hilarious) ass of yourself is amusing and just shows how moronic and childish you actually are. Keep those mentally deficient comeback posts coming, Jules!



---------------------
Haply I may remember,
And haply may forget.

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

Keep them coming! I want more examples of your immaturity and stupidity. It adds colour to this board.

---------------------
Haply I may remember,
And haply may forget.

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

Maybe his dark coloring was due to a partial Romany or Gypsy heritage.

reply

Laurence Olivier was sexy as hell


I saw this movie 20 to 30 years ago and I don't remember Olivier as being so beautiful. But he was.

reply


I had a college professor who said that Laurence Olivier and Merle Oberon, in this film, were the two most beautiful people ever seen together on film...
They are both at literal peaks of their looks. I would say Olivier with Vivien Leigh in Fire over England gives this film a run for its money but its close.

It is not our abilities that show who we truly are...it is our choices

reply

Olivier's stable boy was as hot as the aristocrat. What an artist!

Why ain't you at the garden party you heathen?

reply

i totally agree that Laurence Olivier and either Merle Oberon or Vivian Leigh were top notch in the looks department.

For my money, nothing beats Montgomery Clift and Elizabeth Taylor in A Place in the Sun. The scene where she says "Tell momma all" is amazing...
___________________________________
Never say never...

reply

Isn’t it strange how it’s all inverted. I mean, the majority of men in Hollywood have soft features: softer jawlines, pursued lips. The women have an angular jawlines, large brow ridges, thicker necks, etc. It’s very obvious. However, models are thrown in her purview so much that we’ve been programmed not notice. However, anatomy doesn’t lie. Men aren’t supposed to look like Olivier (soft features) predicted programming tells our brains it’s normal.

reply