It's too early for Fassbender to be promoting AC, it's release is 2 months away.
Are you for real?? I'm already seeing promotion for movies that are scheduled for summer release NEXT YEAR (2017). Two months is "too early"? Then why did AC's production companies bother with releasing movie stills, video clips and the trailer over the past few months? You think that was unnecessary? You clearly have no understanding of marketing. If Fassbender was being guided by such a brainless opinion as yours, I'd expect AC to fail miserably. But hey, this is Fassy's career, not mine. He will get out of it exactly what he puts into it. Lazy effort leads to poor results. That said, I do have greater hope that AC will do MUCH BETTER at the box office than TLBO--a 20 million-dollar film that has only earned a total of $15 million worldwide since its debut two months ago. Pathetic!!
Not everything posted on this board is Vikander-related, OK? This may be hard for you to believe since you live your life stuck inside that fandom bubble, 24/7. FACT: TLBO is a financial FLOP. It makes no sense to keep flogging that dead horse when it has clearly expired. The potential audience numbers are far greater for Assassin's Creed than it is for The Light Between Oceans. The budget is considerably larger too. So, from a profit perspective, more attention should be on AC. Fassy has repeatedly said in interviews that he likes to keep moving forward, that the past is done and he chooses not to dwell on it. Nice concept...too bad he's not practicing it in relation to a film project HE CHOSE to invest in. Whether Vikander is with him or not is irrelevant to this discussion (I actually expect the leech to be hanging around because she can't help herself and Fassy is being an idiot).
I'm reminded of the time when Katie Holmes (the former Stepford Wife of Tom Cruise) abruptly exited The Dark Knight. There was speculation over why she left the successful film franchise after Batman Begins. This was--and still is--her biggest, major league role to date and she effectively walked away from a guaranteed blockbuster. Officially, the reason given was "scheduling conflicts", implying that the choice to leave was hers. However, there was good reason to believe that her performance was the weakest link within the ensemble cast and the studio decided to end her contract (i.e. she was fired). You may be wondering which film garnered her utmost devotion to the point where she (allegedly) turned down Dark Knight. It was Mad Money. A forgettable movie that earned a total of $26 million dollars worldwide. The Dark Knight went on to earn $1 billion globally. What's my point in relating this story? It's about PRIORITIES. If you're an actor striving to go to "the next level" career-wise and an opportunity comes along which would significantly increase your income and enhance your profile, you don't waste such luck. If Holmes (or Fassy for that matter) wasn't interested in achieving those things, then I could understand their behaviour. It's possible that family or other creative pursuits have replaced Hollywood as the top priority. Nothing wrong with that. But I strongly suspect that is NOT the outcome that either actor was vying for. This is why people were shocked with Holmes's decision and are now wondering why Fassbender is a "no show" for hyping his own co-production. As I've already said...it's his life, not mine. We shall see what will happen when December rolls around.
reply
share