I loved him as an actor but portraying a child rapist who caused misery in Kinsey as a 'lightearted' man who could do no wrong turned my stomach. He should have researched the role ..or if he did and still chose to play him as a scientist . Child rape in babies isn't something to be admired or perhaps he enjoys the research kinsey did ? You're a sick man.As a dad didn't he think ?
What do you mean by child rapist? I don't recall him raping any children in that movie.
shareKinsey wasn't a paedophile, he interviewed a paedophile for his research. That's all.
shareYou're stupid.Now shut up.
shareLMAO talking about doing your research, maybe you should have. You got a bit confused there. Or maybe you just saw it on wikipedia and/or tumblr. Yeah people like you believe everything they read from other idiots.
And the idiocracy spreads.
For every lie I unlearn I learn something new - Ani Difranco
I think his stardom is running out of gas!
belated
Hating an actor for playing a character you don't like is stupid to begin with.
It's acting.
Hating an actor for doing something in a role he didn't even do is even dumber.
You are ignorant
shareRight, as if people really hate Edward Norton because he really believes the *beep* he said in American History X. People need to get a grip.
ü
Lance Henriksen is KING!
RIP MASK!