MovieChat Forums > Politics > Judge dismisses DNC lawsuit against Trum...

Judge dismisses DNC lawsuit against Trump campaign over hacking, shooting down weak conspiracy theory.

posted 5 years ago by krl97a (5619)
23 replies | jump to latest

The Clinton appointed judge wrote that their charges of conspiracy with Russia are "entirely divorced from the facts".

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/dnc-lawsuit-trump-campaign-russia-wikileaks-hacking-dismissed

The DNC suit also targeted Wikileaks and others for publicizing the material exposing Democratic party corruption after others had already done the hacking. It's as if Democrats forgot the whole Pentagon Papers case that every intro to constitutional law student learns about ever happened.

reply

[–] dackbar (555) 5 years ago

Oh wow, Fox news. Heard it was in the Bible... proclaimed 2000 years before this even happened.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hjDnwNoE_GA

In comb over we trust.

reply

[–] dackbar (555) 5 years ago

Think on it a bit buddy, it's OK to take your time to comprehend.

reply

[–] krl97a (5619) 5 years ago

Maybe you should refrain from drunk posting next time.

reply

[–] dackbar (555) 5 years ago

Maybe you shouldn't be completely FOS when you post? Did you hear MM fell off his patio because his chin blocked his vision of everything downward facing?

Plus, you missed the conman reference? Truly a shame not to comprehend. Tis a sad day in Merica.

reply

[–] krl97a (5619) 5 years ago

I see you rejected my advice. At least it must be good stuff.

reply

[–] dackbar (555) 5 years ago

Ah, yes yes, trust the comb over.

https://youtu.be/hjDnwNoE_GA

reply

[–] krl97a (5619) 5 years ago

Am I supposed to be clicking on these videos or something? To get me to do that you'd have to say something more intelligent or interesting.

reply

[–] dackbar (555) 5 years ago

Nope, really could not give a shit. Please tell me you have more to say as well, otherwise you're just a party line standing C*nt, who has no insight of their own.

reply

[–] krl97a (5619) 5 years ago

Say about what? You stumbled into this thread seemingly confused and unaware that it's reporting a judicial opinion, not something just Trump or "Fox News" said. Have you even read the article?

reply

[–] dackbar (555) 5 years ago

Oh, so you are just a party repeating C*NT. Do you understand the letter that is left out of what I stated?

reply

[–] krl97a (5619) 5 years ago

I'll take that as a "no".

PS - Which "party" does the Clinton-appointed judge belong to?

reply

[–] dackbar (555) 5 years ago

I'll take that as a "no" as well. I'll give you a tell though, the videos are from the movie "The Hustler" starring Christian Bale.

A judge cites the rule of law in so far as the information they are supplied is legally obtained as well as accurate, then rules upon it. It does not necessarily exonerate anyone, simply the provided facts that were allowable in court did not indict anyone. There could be more facts undiscovered that may lead one way or the other.

OJ got off for some reason. Are you saying Trump is your OJ?

reply

[–] krl97a (5619) 5 years ago

LOL! The evidence against OJ was overwhelming. The evidence against Trump is nonexistent. You really should read the article if you're going to post so many times on this thread.

reply

[–] dackbar (555) 5 years ago

Yet... OJ got off...interesting? Huh?

reply

[–] krl97a (5619) 5 years ago

Because of years of anti-white race baiting by liberals. Mueller's angry Democrats had no interest in letting Trump off. They tried their best to nail him on anything they could. It was a witchhunt in search of a crime. But go ahead and list your OJ level evidence against Trump. The equivalent of the victims' blood being all over his vehicle, garments, etc..

reply

[–] dackbar (555) 5 years ago

Are you serious?

What state do you live in? Are there any non white ppl in your state? You are all semantics and horsesh*t.

reply

[–] krl97a (5619) 5 years ago

So you can't cite any evidence against Trump, let alone OJ level proof. Got it.

Texas is one of the most racially diverse states in the nation, lol. Your response wasn't even coherent. Talk about horsesh*t.

reply

[–] dackbar (555) 5 years ago

How was it not coherent? So how queer are you and how many steers do you f*ck? F'n Texas. I'll have to suspect you of being Mexican living that close to the border. Send some border patrol to investigate, make sure you aren't trying to distract us with the real problems in the US by pretending to be a citizen. You could be smuggling drugs and terrorists into our fine sovereign nation.

OJ level proof, yet OJ never went to prison for that crime..funny.

reply

[–] krl97a (5619) 5 years ago

Somebody broke dackbar, lol. He's in a complete, stammering meltdown.

reply

[–] dackbar (555) 5 years ago

How dem steer doin? you keepin them satisfied?

reply

[–] krl97a (5619) 5 years ago

Your fantasies don't interest me.

reply

[–] krl97a (5619) 5 years ago

One of the many noteworthy portions coming from the decision.

"But, even if the Russians had provided the hacked documents to the Trump team directly (they didn't), the judge wrote, it would not be criminal for the campaign to then publish those documents, as long as they did not contribute to the hacking itself. Similarly, the judge said, it is not criminal to merely solicit or "welcome" stolen documents."

reply

[–] Gd5150 (11317) 5 years ago

Another huge loss for the democrat media/party. Add to that the “debate” last night and it’s another disastrous week for the party of fail.

They better hurry up and find a new rat infested town to defend.

reply