Unreal that there are no comments.....

The marketing of this film would be interesting to know. It sort of has a beatnik-hipster feel to it and I would imagine that was done to try and tap into a current theme of the day back then.

It would not surprise me if this film was also geared toward early shows at drive ins and that is too bad because this really is a hidden gem if viewed in relative terms of 1965.

There is one scene that I am surprised is not more well known and talked about that surely had to be pretty shocking to portray back in '65 and is along the same lines as when Richard Widmark pushed an elerly woman in a wheel chair down a set of stairs.

When I say the title is bad it is with the thought of it really doesn't paint a good picture of what the film is about and I think, just like the movie The Sadist, that it probably created an impression of this movie that didn't resonate with potential viewers.

For 1965, this is really a good picture with good acting and one that really has fallen under the radar and deserves more attention.

To me, a bad title to a movie is one that completely misses the concept of the film and portrays something else, and to me, "Rat Fink" is a bad title for this film and misrepresents its contents in a way that hurts the film.