MovieChat Forums > ElseVerwoerd
ElseVerwoerd (2)
Posts
Replies
A theory about Mia actually believing that Allen abused Dylan is undermined by a few of her & her nannies' actions.
1. On July 12th, Dylan's birthday, Mia hung a note on the bathroom door, visible to the guests, saying "Child molester at Birthday Party! Molded then abused one sister. Now focused on youngest sister. Family disgusted". In other words, Mia announced to the world that Woody was now out to molest Dylan. Yet on Aug 4th, she invited the Terrible Child Molester to Dylan's house, left the two alone, and 'went shopping with a friend'. What mother does THAT? Leave her vulnerable 7 yo girl in the hands of a 'disgusting' child molester?
2. On Aug 5 or 6, Mia was to sign a hard-fought custody agreement with Woody; one they had been working on for several months with a team of attorneys. Yet on the evening of Aug 4th Mia had called her attorney Paul Martin Weltz, and asked him to *stop* sending over the papers to be signed, because of "disturbing news". Yet it was not until the following day, Aug 5, that Mia "suddenly discovered" that Dylan had been "abused". Was Mia clairvoyant on the evening of Aug 4? She went out that evening with Woody and had dinner. Nothing was said about any 'disturbing news', and Mia acted as if she would sign that agreement. How does this fact alone *not* smell like a turd?
3. Mia claims she had warned the three nannies in the house (Kristi, Sophie, Alison) to watch Woody like a hawk. But when the Terrible Child Molester arrived at Dylan's house, ALL THREE NANNIES suddenly suffered from memory loss and 'went to drink tea in the kitchen'. When (they later claimed that) they 'could not find Dylan', they did not search for her in the house and did not call out her name. When Mia returned from 'shopping', only 20 minutes after Woody had arrived, the nannies did not tell Mia and Mia found nothing unusual about Dylan. How is this in any way *credible*? How could Mia 'believe' her own nannies' story, and *not* be angry with their negligence?
Woody Allen's parents (born around 1900) were both born and raised in Manhattan. His grandparents (born around 1870) came from Austria and Lithuania.
It is absurd to call Woody Allen a 'Russian' Jew. No origin of his family in Russia is known, and it is rather doubtful how much of a 'Jew' he is in any meaningful way other than birth, given his well-known agnosticism.
Considering your habit to call other people 'Russian Jews' who aren't Russian in any way, this makes curious as to your motives to do that.
View all replies >