MovieChat Forums > ChoovieMatt
ChoovieMatt (148)
Posts
Replies
I think it's left deliberately ambiguous, but given at the end Helen has become a similar supernatural entity, I'd err to accepting Candyman was/is real and committed the murders. Not too dissimilar to Freddy Krueger killing from another realm and the parents/police in that film thinking it was standard murder or suicide.
Exactly this.
Someone told me being vegetarian was 'woke' the other day.
"Kindness is a social capital, and it's not unlimited."
Coward's answer.
You're absolutely deluded if you think you're helping the situation with the things you post.
Starting threads about how 'disgusting' it is that there's a gay character in a film is not the action of a good person. You don't react to homophobic comments made by other posters preaching your 'good intentions' either, you just pour fuel on the fire.
You can continue to lie to yourself and others, but you know exactly what you're doing.
I forgot to include this observation previously:
"There is no impossibility, it's a scientific fact that majority of people who associate with the LGBTQIA+ community have been sexually abused as kids:"
So, according to your theory, most gay people were victims of abuse who will later go on to form substance abuse issues, live in shame, etc.
Please answer for me then, by you coming on here and calling them disgusting, saying they don't contribute etc., generally adding further abuse and shame to their psyche than that they have, according to *you*, already been victims of...
How are you any better than another abuser?
Yeah yeah everyone else is wrong but right-wing points of view etc... Heard it all before.
You're just regurgitating other people's work as fact, you cant verify it yourself because it's clear you've not mixed with anybody gay, so you have no credibility.
You say gay people 'contribute nothing', but maybe take a good long look in the mirror and ask what the hell it is you're doing.
It is pure confirmation bias - even the most cursory of internet searches brings up various counter studies.
"No one asks them that. They have to TELL them that. There is no such thing as someone being able to SEE your sexual orientation. People have to be INFORMED about it."
Again, you're further underlining the fact you've not been around any gay people.
"Catholic priests. Child groomers. Child predators. Childhood abuse. Relatives who are molesters, etc., etc., etc. Take your pick."
OK, so how many of the above must there be running around to 'indoctrinate' all gay people across the globe? Additionally, how about the children abused who DON'T turn out to be gay? Given that most abusers are men preying on girls you're suggesting ridiculous numbers of people are doing this. It doesn't add up.
"Not if the people lie about their childhood."
Yeah no. Gay folks are HUGELY vocal about their growing up experience because it's the first thing they're ever asked by strangers: "When did you realize?" Key word that - REALIZE.
All of this just compounds the fact that you've never even *spoken* with one of the people of whom you claim to be such an expert in the lives of, and no number of confirmation-bias studies you found online is going to compensate for that oversight.
Try again.
You talk overwhelming amounts of shit.
I doubt you've ever even met a gay person, let alone asked them about this.
There's not a single one I've ever encountered who has said they were 'influenced' into being gay, a theory which is further undone by the fact that most gay adults' childhoods will pre-date seeing ANY gay content on TV, so how were any of them indoctrinated?
Feel free to try your 'they were molested'/'recruited' comeback with all of its mathematical impossibilities. No recruitment drives (how would that even work?), no creepy older people seducing them. Stories of self-discovery are uniformal and consistent throughout the world.
Exactly.
Kukuxu said once before that 'woke' has a specific structured meaning and when asked - repeatedly - to provide a source to this mythical definition, he deflected. Every. Single. Time.
View all replies >