MovieChat Forums > jmcg584054
jmcg584054 (5)
Posts
Replies
Respected historians live shielded from the working of power, political, corporate and criminal. But to their credit they reach conclusions based on the facts available to them, including the dubious Warren Commission report. Nixon did not contest JFK's victory even though he had evidence of the Chicago voter frauds. He chose not to contest "for the good of the Republic." That sentiment was current at that time and the Warren Commission would not necessarily have shied away from the same "for the Republic" sentiment in shielding the public from the scary facts.
As for historians, only recently have new and plentiful official documents come to light. As historian scrutinize them tghey will have some interesting things to say. here's a link to a brief article about these new documents: https://www.history.co.uk/article/did-the-mob-kill-jfk-new-evidence-suggests-they-did
Dorothy Kilgallen, whom Heminway called the greatest woman journalist, investigated and claimed she had the facts on JFK's assassination. Then she was mysteriously killed and her files disappeared.. She was a client/friend of my aunt's. So was Jacquie Kennedy. Jacquie had he own theory of who was behind the assassination, she had good reason to believe what she did.
Joe Kernnedy was a financer of movies, a great way to money launder back then.
Joe was morally twisted for sure. He liked to sexually seduce off-the-boat Irish servants. Then torment them by repeatedly telling them they were going to hell for their sin.
View all replies >