MovieChat Forums > Poozer91 > Replies
Poozer91's Replies
I watched it and loved it. I have no problem with slow moving films. My niece on the other hand, wouldn’t be able to get through it.
This movie was quite bad. It is easily Scorsese’s worst film.
He can easily go to Apple TV. They just through $200,000,000 on three movies that did not make a profit. They seem to be fine with losing hundreds of millions.
It’s just okay, nothing special.
No. He was very monotone and stiff.
Well, Nicolas Cage did all those terrible films due his owing millions to the IRS. Willis was just doing as many quick movies as possible due his debilitating dementia. Morgan Freeman even said in one interview when asked if he still has a burning desire to work he responded by saying it was more like smoldering embers. Sadly, the sounds like he does not care and will star in anything if it pays okay regardless of quality.
Well if the movie portrayed him better than his actual self, then I feel sorry for the sons that had to live under him.
I would not point out a spelling mistake on Twitter either, but to be fair it’s not hard to check when you have 140 characters or less.
Who cares about John Cusack? Guy hasn’t made a good movie in nearly a decade. Also, if you disagree with him on any issue or point out a spelling error on his Twitter, he will immediately block you. A real mature, well-adjusted, non insecure individual.
Don’t you mean Phil Collins
In my opinion she is a good actress.
As for the Don’t Worry Darling controversy, I think Olivia Wilde came out looking a lot worse.
1.) The movie failed with critics and audiences in terms of reviews, despite the movie making a slight profit.
2.) She lied to the press saying she stuck up for her actors by saying she fired Shia Labeouf, but later Labeouf provided emails and texts proving he quit and she actually tried to keep him on the film.
3.) She attempts to promote the movie as social relevant by making remarks criticizing Jordan Peterson (I do not have a feeling about him one way or the other), claiming he pandered to Incels and was a faux intellectual. Which seems a little strange coming from someone who dropped out of high school (Wilde), criticizing someone who has a PhD in Clinical Psychology.
Never have. I thought he played a charming but sadistic wealthy business mogul in “Would you rather.”
I think he is a character actor who is typecast as weirdos, but does an excellent job as them.
Not really. You compare that role with his Goodfellas role it is totally different.
His age had nothing to due with the volume of his voice he was using, it was the character he was playing. I don’t think he is a very versatile actor, but role was an approach to a character he never used before.
He is playing a completely against type role as a soft spoken and quiet Mafia boss in The Irishman.
Never liked it. John Carpenter says it is a far superior film to its predecessor. I know it’s campy, but the tone is completely different from EFNY.
I think the Deer Hunter is an emotionally powerful and essential anti-war Vietnam film. His other movies never reached the heights of his master pieces after Heaven’s Gate. I think once you nearly bankrupt a studio and with a bad public response, people tend to go with other filmmakers.
Yeah, I watched the three hour and thirty nine minutes version. There is even a 90-odd minutes version on the Blue-Ray release of the movie that I believe Steven Soderbergh edited.
Okay, thank you. I did hear there were several different versions of the movie out there, but it seems that critics were exaggerating the negative audience reception of the movie.
Just curious. Did you see it in when it was released in theaters and how did audiences react to it?