MovieChat Forums > thbryn > Replies
thbryn's Replies
I couldn't ID the weapon Frank wanted to use. But it appeared to me a Military issue BAR (with a scope) semi-auto. It was nothing like the piece of junk LHO used and this was almost ten years before Dallas.
For the record I don't believe LHO hit the President. He may have shot but I do think he was a Patsy.
Maybe it will be shown somewhere as a light showcase of the SS talents post her passing away?
I get the feeling they are writing script to send Victor off for a while. Like maybe to cover for some treatment and rehab?
They probably shot that months ago so it may be done. And of course we hope Eric is both feeling ok and doing better.
I hope Eric is doing "ok:" he's ill and getting the best treatment if things are going to plan. Obviously it's tough. I don't know how his schedule is being affected?
He appears to be gutting through this -and the anniversary year- and showing his stick-to-it- drive that makes the character formidable. Wishing for the best and some luck for EB too.
I thought the recent hope and Sheila writing has been strong and more than a little wild.
There is no amount of praise for hope's "talent" that she does not readily accept. She is an egomaniac. A 'design superstar.'
Shelia turns up almost anywhere/anytime and just has answers for all around her, that have concerns. She's very amusing if not flat out funny.
Anytime Stanwyk and Gilbert Roland were together was good. They were doomed but you could feel Roland's warmth.
Well I didn't like it. The two Senior stars (Gambon,Landsbury)) were barely in it. I wasn't happy with the audio or video. The W. Ryder film was very close to winning best picture and was not even comparable: much much better.
Didn't like it at all. And from a technical aspect the audio seemed muffled and I had a hard time hearing it. Annoying.
Attention needing nerd. I've never seen him or heard him just noticed those talking about him. Good ethnic backgronud for occupation.
If you know content, then you probably can see where things make sense. if you don't then I can appreciate where things are complicated.
For example the Jack Lemmon, Ed Asner characters -early- are known by mostly no viewers, that haven't done extensive reading. But they are quite well known in the overall scheme even though they are not major players.
For the film to make the kind of money it did without being a mass-market blockbuster that virtually nobody under-18 would be interested in, was a major accomplishment. It didn't happen because it was second-rate production. The film changed things in ways that the media <i>never </i> did.
He wanted everyone to pay attention for two reasons. He's been out of the public's attention. Some entity knows his medical record and is going to release it first.
He could have been less dramatic and just said I've had a tough time but I'm recovered and am getting stronger. Instead he's invited speculation. It sounds like something Dan Patrick sports talk host had but tried to fight through and keep his job.
<i>Dan Patrick Details Struggles with Memory Loss, Intense Joint Pain. Patrick, whose show is simulcast by Bleacher Report, said he was first diagnosed with polymyalgia rheumatica </i>
<i>everybody on the show had some pretty bad moments. Some were downright horrible. </i>
I pretty much disliked the personnel in total. I doubt that was the idea of the writers/production staff. Not liking everyone probably isn't a winning formula, but it worked. What worked for me was 1-2 moments of comedy in the 24min show that was unique and you wouldn't see any where else. Just much more subtle than the competition.
<i><b>“I don’t know Rosie. We’re not friends.” </i></b>
So how does she say something like that to Larry King? Something more than the obvious lie here. Quite sinister.
Even if she was -and she's not- she's one fabulous babe.
Yes well I would imagine the standards then, for animal treatment, were very different. That's not to say they purposefully mistreated the animals but it looked as if they were.
The stunts looked real...but they could not have been. Much too dangerous.
Whoever they had stunting for J.Wayne was incredible. If it was real I would think everybody came away hurt.
This is not a typical Wayne performance. he did a little comedy, had some sexual interest, didn't hit people who were set up and appeared to work hard. After this and the picture with Otto preminger he appeared to check out and do routine stuff.
Is this --out 2 years- on disc yet?
He's back in the news <i>vis-a-vis </i> the defamation lawsuit against trump. I think his voice has been played in the courtroom.
I read Bel's 'witnesses deaths' book. First I'd just say how well done it is, it reads almost like a textbook with heavily outlined paragraphs. I have to believe his <b>co-author </b> did most if not all of the reporting, organizing and writing this text. Not that RB wasn't capable but he was a professional working actor, not a writer.
If you gegt a chance and are interested in this type of material I rec. it. You can go through it quickly and be a lot more knowledgeable in the process.
While I don't think his language had anything --at all-- to do with his dismissal why does he have to be so vulgar? He and his family present themselves like crude punks.
I assume O'Toole won the BFTAS? British were not likely to pass on the great performance. Somewhat the way Academy weren't not taking Peck. I think I would have voted for the newcomer's extremely flashy role on merit but there are other things involved and you can't deny that.