MovieChat Forums > artguylarry > Replies
artguylarry's Replies
I think the precise moment (or moments) that bothered me was when there was any mention of "gay" and they everyone looked at each other in such horror, as if it was something to be so horrified OF. Maybe I read the movie wrong, and I hope so. It was otherwise moderately entertaining.
Can't argue with a fucktard
Ok, you know what duster? I don't think you have any need to figure me out. True, I am not a big fan of kids, but I don't dislike kids in movies, and I don't dislike movies in general when kids are in them. My opinion is not "stupid", it is valid. My opinion on horror movies is that sometimes when kids are somewhere in the central plot, the horror tends to tread a little too lightly. That's all I am saying, and just for the record, I entirely agree with foebane. The Omen films (at least the first two) are a great example of what works well. I love those movies, and hadn't even thought about them. I'm not a troll. I make observations, and form opinions on them. That is what these boards are for, are they not? Back off.
The mic was already dropped.
And no, they haven't.
In no order...
To Wong Foo
Dirty Dancing
11:14
I loved [i]The Outsiders[/i] equally, but I don't necessarily consider it a Patrick Swayze movie. His part was better than minimal, but still kind of small.
Salt it up good!
Wouldn't that be just tragic?
......Box seats at the Met, Rose. (...?)
Nope.
Yeah the "oops" grated on me too. What are the chances that everything this annoying kid did was an "accident", but accidentally made him the "hero"? That's not the Force. That's just stupid, lousy (and lazy) writing.
I agree completely. Kids in horror never works.
The deaths were decent. That's worth a star or two.
It's raining men. Hallelujah, it's raining men. Amen.
Dawn - I can see where Dawn was necessary to the Glory arc, but then Glory was the most excruciating of the big-bads. Axe them both.
Glory - See the above point.
Anya - Cringe worthy every time she opened her mouth.
Andrew - why the hell did they fight to protect him???
Fantasy Jonathan - just no. Real Jonathan? Not much better.
Spike - I never really understood the appeal. But is THAT why Buffy never killed him? Because the show wanted a hot bad guy? He wasn't that hot. He was just an annoyance.
I can't list Buffy as a least favorite, but I was a little miffed that after season 5, she had NOTHING to do with defeating the "big bads." Season 6 was defeated by Xander and the final season was saved by Spike. Maybe that's why they kept him alive.
OK. I'll bow out. "Sport". Oh and the people who kicked their chairs away, those were the ones who hanged themselves.
Tell that to all the people who have kicked their chairs away.
This may be off topic of the show itself, but game on.
For some it IS a struggle. And for some it's not. Everyone's story is different. Everyone's family is different. Everyone's job is different. The stakes are higher for some than they are for others. And no, not everyone knows this of themselves right away. Self discovery is a real thing, genius. Don't be a dick because it wasn't as easy for everyone as it obviously was for you. I always knew and maybe you did too, but few people are that lucky.
You're kidding me! I would have sworn this was all hidden cameras capturing the reality of life. Thank god you were here.
Then you didn't read my original post, did you? I said grow them up. As I said: "There's nothing wrong with the "circle of friends" formula even in middle age. It would be a whole different dynamic. No purple apartment, no Foosball table, no Central Perk. Just the friends we love, living as middle aged people do, who have aged/grown just as we have, with teens and adult children."
Though "adult children" may be a bit far, kids/teen kids would be believable.
Wow....clever....